Tyler Stice vs Thanapet Chanta Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Oct at 03:38 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Stice vs T. Chanta

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

THA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Stice 0 - 1 Chanta
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tyler Stice winning 0 and Thanapet Chanta winning 2. The last match between Thanapet Chanta and Tyler Stice was at the M15 Hua Hin, 21-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Thanapet Chanta getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stice | 0 |
| Chanta | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Hua Hin(10-21-25)
T. Stice vs T. Chanta H2H Profile
T. Stice vs T. Chanta Match Preview:
- In recent second serve performance, Thanapet Chanta edges slightly ahead with 42.72% of points won compared to Tyler Stice's 42.52%. Could this minor difference impact the match outcome?
- When it comes to returning games, Thanapet Chanta demonstrates stronger capabilities, winning 45.59% of opponents' second serve points, against Tyler Stice's 43.44%. This statistic could provide Chanta an advantage.
- The difference is more pronounced in first serve return points, where Chanta again surpasses Stice, winning 28.93% compared to 25.08%. Does this suggest that Chanta might handle Stice's serves more effectively?
- Under pressure, both players display similar abilities in saving breakpoints: Tyler Stice has a saving percentage of 55.19%, whereas Thanapet Chanta's is slightly lower at 54.40%.
- Regarding match victories over the past year, Thanapet Chanta has won 45.95% of their matches, with a slight edge over Tyler Stice's 41.67%. Will this trend reflect in their head-to-head matchup?
- Surface preference shows Tyler Stice performs best on Hard courts with a 61% win rate, while Chanta excels on Indoor Hard courts, also with 61%. How might surface affect their game?
- In terms of player levels, both frequently compete at the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K. Chanta has a winning percentage of 54.84%, higher than Stice's 41.67%. Could this show Chanta's stronger form this year?
- Analyzing opponent quality, Chanta has faced slightly tougher opponents, with an average rank of 369.97, compared to Stice's 442.72. Will this give Chanta an edge in handling higher competition?
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Tyler Stice might have a slight advantage, having won 55% of such sets over the last 12 months compared to Chanta's 54%.
Editorial Prediction (October 21, 2025, UTC):
Thanapet Chanta has demonstrated a slight edge in several key areas, especially in return games and overall match victories in the past year. His ability to handle more competitive opponents and his recent second serve performance suggests he might have the upper hand.
While Tyler Stice performs well under pressure and in deciding sets, the overall trends favor Chanta. If the match extends to a deciding set, Stice's slight edge may not be enough to overcome Chanta's consistent performance throughout the match.
Considering these facets, Thanapet Chanta appears to be the more likely winner in this upcoming tennis match.
Tyler Stice vs Thanapet Chanta Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Stice vs T. Chanta H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 6 | Games Won | 13 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:40:55 | Average Match Time | 1:40:55 |
| 59% (35/59) | 1st Serve % | 53% (27/51) |
| 51% (18/35) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (19/27) |
| 33% (8/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 63% (15/24) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Pts Won % | 86% (6/7) |
| 33% (17/51) | Return Points Win % | 56% (33/59) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Stice Recent Matches Played
T. Chanta Recent Matches Played

T. Stice vs T. Chanta Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.14% (60/45) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.02% (116/107) |
| 54.36% (131/110) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.22% (251/239) |
| 51.30% (1184/1124) | Games Win/Loss | 50.74% (2326/2258) |
| 60.00% (45/30) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.92% (108/100) |
| 48.00% (12/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.33% (8/7) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.16 |
| 64 | Aces Total | 357 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 206 | Total Double Faults | 480 |
| 1:24:52 | Average Match Time | 1:18:46 |
| 342.52 | Average Opponent Rank | 401.53 |
| 64% (3228/5081) | 1st Serve % | 61% (7154/11716) |
| 64% (2052/3228) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (4768/7154) |
| 48% (886/1852) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (2389/4563) |
| 43% (240/552) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (487/1168) |
| 41% (2115/5136) | Return Points Win % | 40% (4700/11791) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 15.79% (3/16) |
| 57.69% (60/44) | Futures W/L | 55.39% (113/91) |
| 58% (60/104) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (108/211) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 56% (14/25) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (37/63) |
| 67% (20/30) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (26/51) |
| 88% (49/43) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (115/99) |
| 12% (49/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (115/15) |
| 30% (56/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (108/14) |