Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tung-Lin Wu vs Taro Daniel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wu vs Daniel analysis and find out who is favored!
Tung-Lin Wu vs Taro Daniel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wu has won 53.37% of points on his second serve, while Daniel has won 52.08%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wu, in recent form, has won 50.54% of his opponent's second serve points, while Daniel has won 50.71%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.93% and 30.94% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wu has saved 55.71% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Daniel has saved 60.62% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wu has won 47.17% of matches played (W/L 25/ 28), with Daniel winning 55.07% (W/L 38/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 168/ 126), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Daniel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 300/ 193), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Wu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.28% of matches (W/L 20/ 19), where as Daniel has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 48.15% of matches (W/L 13/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Wu winning 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Wu winning 0 and Daniel winning 4. The last match between Wu and Daniel was at the Nur-Sultan 2 Challenger, 05-03-2021, Quarterfinals, I.hard with Taro Daniel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:18:1.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wu and Daniel have played a deciding set 0 times, with Wu winning 0 times and Daniel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wu winning 0, and Daniel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wu has played against opponents with an average rank of 301.72 while Daniel has played against players with an average rank of 255.87.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wu has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Daniel has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wu has converted 38.32% of breakpoint opportunities, and Daniel has converted 46.12% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wu 0 - 2 Daniel
289
Rank
158
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
85
Rank
58
High
31
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
54% (225-188)
Career Total W/L
58% (546-388)
47% (9-10)
YTD W/L
45% (9-11)
$106,780
Career Prize Money
$2,142,314
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tung-Lin Wu | Taro Daniel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 4 |
| Games Won | 11 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:18:1 | 1:18:1 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (58/94) | 54% (64/119) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (37/58) | 72% (46/64) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 25% (9/36) | 51% (28/55) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 59% (10/17) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (45/119) | 51% (48/94) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats 
Taro Daniel
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
72%
(
28 of
39)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tung-Lin Wu | Taro Daniel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (9/10) | 45% (9/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (20/24) | 43% (20/26) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (220/220) | 47% (204/229) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (9/9) | 47% (7/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.39 |
| Aces Total | 60 | 81 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.18 |
| DFs Total | 43 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:54 | 1:41:16 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 247.05 | 175.85 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (919/1395) | 60% (821/1365) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (609/919) | 69% (567/821) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (250/476) | 50% (273/544) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (55/142) | 44% (40/90) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (507/1355) | 35% (459/1319) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 53% (8/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 46% (6/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (9/18) | 44% (8/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 50% (2/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 50% (2/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (7/7) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (7/0) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 10% (10/1) |
Tung-Lin Wu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Lloyd Harris
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
53%
(
31 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
69 of
120)
4
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
30 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
47 of
120)
113
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Dane Sweeny
76%
(
74 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 6-7(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Cash Hanzlik
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Ezekiel Clark
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Jacob Brumm
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Taro Daniel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Taro Daniel
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
80%
(
35 of
44)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Christopher O'Connell
85%
(
45 of
53)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Taro Daniel
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
102)
9
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
46 of
57)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
28 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Taro Daniel
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
97%
(
28 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Taro Daniel
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Taro Daniel
37%
(
18 of
49)
1st Serve %
40%
(
19 of
48)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Taro Daniel
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Taro Daniel
45%
(
43 of
95)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
7
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
56%
(
29 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Taro Daniel
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Wu Vs Daniel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tung-Lin Wu
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Taro Daniel
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
