Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tung-Lin Wu vs Mark Lajal Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wu vs Lajal analysis and find out who is favored!
Tung-Lin Wu vs Mark Lajal Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wu has won 53.77% of points on his second serve, while Lajal has won 48.92%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wu, in recent form, has won 50.4% of his opponent's second serve points, while Lajal has won 52.13%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.13% and 30.51% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wu has saved 57.78% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Lajal has saved 64.48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wu has won 50% of matches played (W/L 28/ 28), with Lajal winning 53.85% (W/L 35/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 168/ 125), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Lajal has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 69/ 37), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 7/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Wu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.76% of matches (W/L 23/ 19), where as Lajal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.7% of matches (W/L 29/ 25). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Wu winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Wu winning 2 and Lajal winning 3. The last match between Wu and Lajal was at the Nonthaburi 3 Challenger, 15-01-2024, First, Hard with Tung-Lin Wu getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:13:59.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wu and Lajal have played a deciding set 1 times, with Wu winning 1 times and Lajal 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wu winning 0, and Lajal 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wu has played against opponents with an average rank of 298.46 while Lajal has played against players with an average rank of 347.58.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wu has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Lajal has won 36% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wu has converted 39.35% of breakpoint opportunities, and Lajal has converted 38.24% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wu 1 - 1 Lajal
257
Rank
158
High
25
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
208
Rank
191
High
20
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
55% (225-187)
Career Total W/L
60% (103-69)
50% (9-9)
YTD W/L
40% (6-9)
$106,780
Career Prize Money
$11,825
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tung-Lin Wu | Mark Lajal |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 26 | 28 |
| Aces (Total) | 10 | 13 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:13:59 | 2:13:59 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (104/148) | 61% (115/187) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (68/104) | 70% (81/115) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (23/44) | 40% (29/72) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 35% (8/23) | 50% (8/16) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (77/187) | 39% (57/148) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Mark Lajal
71%
(
63 of
89)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
111)
6
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
7
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
111)
107
Total Points Won
93
|
||||
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
4
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tung-Lin Wu | Mark Lajal |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (9/9) | 40% (6/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 48% (20/22) | 46% (16/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (212/208) | 49% (163/171) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 53% (9/8) | 44% (4/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 40% (2/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.37 |
| Aces Total | 59 | 61 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.41 |
| DFs Total | 42 | 67 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:30 | 1:53:47 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 259.06 | 314.33 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (877/1336) | 58% (636/1093) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (584/877) | 69% (440/636) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (243/459) | 48% (221/457) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (52/130) | 35% (36/102) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (485/1296) | 38% (405/1071) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (6/6) | 43% (6/8) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 53% (9/17) | 36% (5/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 100% (4/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (7/7) | 71% (7/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (7/0) | 29% (7/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 13% (8/1) |
Tung-Lin Wu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
69 of
120)
4
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
30 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
47 of
120)
113
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Dane Sweeny
76%
(
74 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 6-7(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Cash Hanzlik
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Ezekiel Clark
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Jacob Brumm
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Mark Lajal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Mark Lajal
55%
(
55 of
100)
1st Serve %
48%
(
45 of
93)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
8
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
93)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
6-2 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Philip Sekulic
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
5
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
4
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Duckhee Lee
44%
(
15 of
34)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
13 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
53
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Mark Lajal
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Yunseong Chung
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Mark Lajal
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
47%
(
34 of
72)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
7
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Radu Albot
Player
Mark Lajal
69%
(
73 of
106)
1st Serve %
64%
(
62 of
97)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
44 of
62)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
38 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
109
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
James Kent Trotter
Player
Mark Lajal
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Mark Lajal
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mark Lajal
Player
Lucas Poullain
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Wu Vs Lajal Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tung-Lin Wu
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
