Prediction of Tucker Vorster vs Nerman Fatic Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Vorster vs N. Fatic

Tucker Vorster
RSA
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
37
Age
31
6'5" (196 cm)
Height
6'3" (191 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
214
278
Best Rank
191
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$74.0K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Nerman Fatic
BIH
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
37
Age
31
6'5" (196 cm)
Height
6'3" (191 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
214
278
Best Rank
191
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$74.0K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Vorster 1 - 0 Fatic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tucker Vorster winning 2 and Nerman Fatic winning 0. The last match between Tucker Vorster and Nerman Fatic was at the Egypt F12, 30-03-2015, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Tucker Vorster getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Vorster | 1 |
| Fatic | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Egypt F12(03-30-15)
Tucker Vorster
6
6
Nerman Fatic
1
2
T. Vorster vs N. Fatic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $73,995 |
| 65.00% (169-91) | Career Total W/L | 58.47% (404-287) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 12 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
T. Vorster vs N. Fatic Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tucker Vorster has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nerman Fatic has won 44.18%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tucker Vorster, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nerman Fatic has won 45.34%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.45% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tucker Vorster has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nerman Fatic has saved 54.12% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tucker Vorster has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Nerman Fatic winning 73.91% (W/L 51/18) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tucker Vorster has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 153/72), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
- Player level: In the last year, Tucker Vorster has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.10% of matches (W/L 25/14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tucker Vorster winning 1 times and Nerman Fatic being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tucker Vorster winning 2 and Nerman Fatic winning 0.
- The last match between Tucker Vorster and Nerman Fatic was at the Egypt F12, 30-03-2015, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Tucker Vorster getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tucker Vorster has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Nerman Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 338.61.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tucker Vorster has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nerman Fatic has won 84% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tucker Vorster has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nerman Fatic has converted 33.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Tucker Vorster vs Nerman Fatic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Vorster vs N. Fatic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Vorster 0%, Fatic 51%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Vorster 0%, Fatic 53%.
Break Points Saved %: Vorster 0%, Fatic 61%.
T. Vorster Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-4 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 2-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 7-5 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-0 7-5 | ||
N. Fatic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 4-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-6 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(2) ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||

T. Vorster vs N. Fatic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.00% (169/91) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.47% (404/287) |
| 62.69% (363/216) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.49% (890/658) |
| 55.08% (3003/2449) | Games Win/Loss | 53.03% (7602/6734) |
| 68.00% (153/72) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.19% (43/41) |
| 44.44% (4/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.00% (341/218) |
| 48.00% (12/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43.48% (20/26) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 425 | Aces Total | 1598 |
| 0.06 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 156 | Total Double Faults | 1517 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:20:1 |
| 554.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 509.29 |
| 65% (3145/4868) | 1st Serve % | 66% (23791/35820) |
| 72% (2279/3145) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (15579/23791) |
| 52% (895/1723) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (5772/12029) |
| 40% (149/371) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (1969/4222) |
| 35% (1616/4615) | Return Points Win % | 43% (15618/36165) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 71.43% (5/2) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 25.00% (3/9) |
| 41.86% (18/25) | Challenger W/L | 52.89% (119/106) |
| 69.52% (146/64) | Futures W/L | 63.24% (277/161) |
| 66% (162/247) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (394/662) |
| 50% (3/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 59% (58/98) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (79/156) |
| 57% (33/58) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (102/189) |
| 93% (158/147) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (394/348) |
| 7% (158/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (394/42) |
| 22% (102/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (297/57) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Fri, 21 Nov, 06:00 PM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 05:00 AM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 06:00 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 09:00 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 05:05 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 06:30 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Sydney Challenger Preview And Prediction: James McCabe vs Rinky Hijikata Betting Tips & Picks November 21, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Bennemann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Bergamo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Mark Lajal vs Justin Engel Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Jaume Antoni Munar Clar vs Jiri Lehecka Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ESP – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →LP Open by IND – Colina Preview And Prediction: Laura Pigossi vs Leolia Jeanjean Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025
Top Predictions Today
04:10
H2H 1-1
20:00
H2H 0-1
17:00
H2H 0-0
18:30
H2H 0-0
18:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal