Tristan Boyer vs Camilo Ugo Carabelli Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L L W L W L
Form
L W W L W L W W L LH2H: Boyer 2 - 1 Carabelli
They have played 7 sets in total, with Boyer winning 5 and Carabelli winning 2. The last match between Boyer and Carabelli was at the Montevideo Challenger, 16-11-2024, Semifinals, Clay with Tristan Boyer getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tristan Boyer | 2 |
| Camilo Ugo Carabelli | 1 |
Montevideo Challenger(16-11-2024)
6
1
6
3
| Boyer | Stats | Carabelli |
|---|---|---|
| 45% (10-12) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (20-11) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 120 | Ranking | 59 |
| 109 | Highest Rank | 59 |
| 24 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 3 | Titles | 12 |
| 56% (141-111) | Career Total W/L | 63% (367-211) |
| $258,740 | Career Prize Money | $399,935 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 2 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Dzumhur VS Bellucci PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Boulter VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-3 |
Stats 
Tristan Boyer
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
47%
(
35 of
74)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| 6-3 5-4 ret. |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve %
43%
(
23 of
54)
3
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 3-6 6-1 7-5 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Tristan Boyer
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 35 | Games Won | 27 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 11 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:47:32 | Average Match Time | 1:47:32 |
| 61% (111/182) | 1st Serve % | 53% (113/213) |
| 75% (83/111) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (70/113) |
| 51% (36/71) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (53/100) |
| 38% (9/24) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (5/10) |
| 42% (90/213) | Return Points Win % | 35% (63/182) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 67% (3/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (3/1) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tristan Boyer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Harold Mayot
Player
Tristan Boyer
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Jesper De Jong
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
7
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
82%
(
49 of
60)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
47 of
62)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
30%
(
28 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
26 of
92)
92
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Tristan Boyer
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Denis Yevseyev
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Tristan Boyer
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Tristan Boyer
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Tristan Boyer
57%
(
54 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
4
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
3
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
42 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
89
|
1-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jacob Fearnley
Player
Tristan Boyer
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
41 of
62)
4
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
0
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tristan Boyer
Player
Yasutaka Uchiyama
80%
(
67 of
84)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
23 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
98
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Tristan Boyer
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
71 of
102)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
94
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexandre Muller
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Hamad Medjedovic
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
2
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Hugo Gaston
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
70%
(
30 of
43)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Radu Albot
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Novak Djokovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
10
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Alex Michelsen
67%
(
75 of
112)
1st Serve %
76%
(
73 of
96)
3
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
51 of
73)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
38 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
96)
106
Total Points Won
102
|
6-7(3) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Brandon Holt
65%
(
65 of
100)
1st Serve %
73%
(
72 of
98)
8
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
2
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
40%
(
14 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
101
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
64%
(
54 of
85)
12
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
27 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(2) 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (141/111) | Win/Loss | 63% (367/211) |
| 55% (322/264) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (808/530) |
| 52% (2945/2720) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (6676/5686) |
| 56% (68/54) | Hard Win/Loss | 54% (35/30) |
| 57% (70/53) | Clay Win/Loss | 65% (331/178) |
| 50% (3/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 611 | Aces Total | 1044 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 517 | Total Double Faults | 1273 |
| 1:28:36 | Average Match Time | 1:41:9 |
| 325.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 365.42 |
| 64% (9165/14424) | 1st Serve % | 62% (23177/37389) |
| 67% (6117/9165) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (15392/23177) |
| 51% (2681/5259) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7035/14211) |
| 41% (570/1389) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1994/4400) |
| 40% (5675/14187) | Return Points Win % | 43% (16340/37963) |
| 44% (4/5) | Slam W/L | 42% (8/11) |
| 43% (3/4) | Masters W/L | 40% (6/9) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 29% (2/5) | Main Tour W/L | 50% (20/20) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (73/47) | Challenger W/L | 65% (187/99) |
| 54% (59/50) | Futures W/L | 67% (146/72) |
| 56% (139/247) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (356/556) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 54% (7/13) |
| 55% (47/85) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (80/145) |
| 51% (42/82) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (104/177) |
| 84% (147/124) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (339/301) |
| 16% (147/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (339/35) |
| 16% (105/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (239/65) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
