Prediction of Tracey Morton Rodgers vs Ruth Seeman Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
T. Morton Rodgers vs R. Seeman

Tracey Morton Rodgers

AUS

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

201

Best Rank

212

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Ruth Seeman

NZL

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

201

Best Rank

212

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Rodgers 1 - 0 Seeman

They have played 2 sets in total, with Tracey Morton Rodgers winning 2 and Ruth Seeman winning 0. The last match between Tracey Morton Rodgers and Ruth Seeman was at the Tasmania CH, 25-02-1985, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Tracey Morton Rodgers getting the victory 6-4 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Rodgers	1
Seeman	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Tasmania CH(02-25-85)

Stats

Tracey Morton Rodgers

Ruth Seeman

T. M. Rodgers vs R. Seeman H2H Profile

T. M. Rodgers	Stats	R. Seeman
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
45.40% (153-184)	Career Total W/L	49.65% (70-71)
1	Hard	0
1	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

T. M. Rodgers vs R. Seeman Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tracey Morton Rodgers has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ruth Seeman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tracey Morton Rodgers, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ruth Seeman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Tracey Morton Rodgers has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ruth Seeman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Tracey Morton Rodgers has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Ruth Seeman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Tracey Morton Rodgers has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 57% (W/L 36/27), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 34% (W/L 10/19). Ruth Seeman has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 57% (W/L 11/9), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 38% (W/L 5/8).
Player level: In the last year, Tracey Morton Rodgers has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Ruth Seeman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tracey Morton Rodgers winning 1 times and Ruth Seeman being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tracey Morton Rodgers winning 2 and Ruth Seeman winning 0.
The last match between Tracey Morton Rodgers and Ruth Seeman was at the Tasmania CH, 25-02-1985, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Tracey Morton Rodgers getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tracey Morton Rodgers has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Ruth Seeman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tracey Morton Rodgers has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ruth Seeman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Tracey Morton Rodgers has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ruth Seeman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Tracey Morton Rodgers vs Ruth Seeman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

T. M. Rodgers vs R. Seeman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

T. M. Rodgers	Stats	R. Seeman
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	5
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

T. M. Rodgers Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Fayetteville 25K - 22-07-1996
R3 Meghann ShaughnessyM. Shaughnessy	L	6-4 6-7 6-1	Stats
Hilton Head 10K - 10-06-1996
R3 Stephanie TibbitsS. Tibbits	L	2-6 6-0 6-2	Stats
Mission 25K - 22-01-1996
R3 Rachel ViolletR. Viollet	L	7-6 6-4	Stats
Woodlands 10K - 17-01-1996
R3 Sara PritchardS. Pritchard	L	6-3 6-1	Stats
ITF La Havre - 20-11-1995
R4 Ariadne KatsouliA. Katsouli	W	0-6 7-5 6-0	Stats

View All

R. Seeman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Wellington - 04-02-1991
Q3 Miriam OremansM. Oremans	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
Q2 Stacey SchefflinS. Schefflin	W	6-2 0-1 RET	Stats
Q1 Ann DevriesA. Devries	W	6-3 6-1	Stats
Auckland - 28-01-1991
Q1 Petra SchwarzP. Schwarz	L	6-3 3-6 6-3	Stats
ITF Milan - 23-07-1990
R3 Magdalena SimkovaM. Simkova	L	6-3 7-6	Stats

View All

T. M. Rodgers vs R. Seeman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

T. M. Rodgers	Stats	R. Seeman
45.40% (153/184)	YTD Win/Loss	49.65% (70/71)
46.57% (360/413)	Sets Win/Loss	48.92% (158/165)
49.65% (3522/3571)	Games Win/Loss	50.08% (1474/1469)
38.35% (51/82)	Hard Win/Loss	49.25% (33/34)
51.11% (46/44)	Clay Win/Loss	52.78% (19/17)
45.45% (10/12)	Indoor Hard W/L	40.00% (2/3)
57.14% (36/27)	Grass Win/Loss	55.00% (11/9)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
434.43	Average Opponent Rank	415.16
42.86% (3/4)	Slam W/L	66.67% (2/1)
52.02% (90/83)	Challenger W/L	54.55% (42/35)
34.48% (10/19)	Futures W/L	16.67% (1/5)
46% (153/335)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	49% (66/135)
54% (19/35)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	22% (2/9)
48% (49/103)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (25/50)
79% (162/128)	1st Set Won, Won Match	78% (65/51)
21% (162/34)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	20% (65/13)
14% (173/25)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	21% (73/15)