Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tommy Paul vs Karen Khachanov Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paul vs Khachanov analysis and find out who is favored!
Tommy Paul vs Karen Khachanov Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paul has won 53.71% of points on his second serve, while Khachanov has won 53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paul, in recent form, has won 52.58% of his opponent's second serve points, while Khachanov has won 50.25%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.92% and 28.64% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paul has saved 65.63% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Khachanov has saved 61.74% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paul has won 61.11% of matches played (W/L 44/ 28), with Khachanov winning 65.31% (W/L 32/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paul has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 116/ 66), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 61% (W/L 22/ 14). Khachanov has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 25/ 14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 99/ 68).
- Player level: In the last year, Paul has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 20/ 12), where as Khachanov has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 14/ 7). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paul winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Paul winning 2 and Khachanov winning 1. The last match between Paul and Khachanov was at the Miami Open - Miami, 26-03-2022, Second, Hard with Tommy Paul getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:24:26.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paul and Khachanov have played a deciding set 1 times, with Paul winning 1 times and Khachanov 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Paul winning 1, and Khachanov 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paul has played against opponents with an average rank of 144.31 while Khachanov has played against players with an average rank of 129.06.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paul has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Khachanov has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paul has converted 40.72% of breakpoint opportunities, and Khachanov has converted 40.91% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Paul 1 - 0 Khachanov
16
Rank
12
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
17
Rank
8
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
63% (399-230)
Career Total W/L
61% (397-258)
68% (15-7)
YTD W/L
68% (17-8)
$5,480,210
Career Prize Money
$11,355,678
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tommy Paul | Karen Khachanov |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:24:26 | 2:24:26 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (55/87) | 67% (74/110) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (41/55) | 64% (47/74) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (16/32) | 58% (21/36) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 19% (3/16) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (42/110) | 34% (30/87) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 7-6(3) |
Stats 
Tommy Paul
Player
Karen Khachanov
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
67%
(
74 of
110)
6
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
74)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
19%
(
3 of
16)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
110)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tommy Paul | Karen Khachanov |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 68% (15/7) | 68% (17/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 66% (37/19) | 63% (40/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (286/232) | 53% (341/302) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (10/6) | 67% (10/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 71% (5/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (4/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.47 | 0.64 |
| Aces Total | 119 | 201 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.09 |
| DFs Total | 38 | 27 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:6 | 2:1:38 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 162.32 | 117.04 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (990/1651) | 64% (1253/1947) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (717/990) | 74% (928/1253) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (355/661) | 53% (365/694) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (68/167) | 41% (69/167) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (691/1705) | 37% (755/2050) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 75% (3/1) |
| Masters W/L | 63% (5/3) | 64% (7/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 73% (8/3) | 70% (7/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 72% (13/18) | 65% (13/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 75% (3/4) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 77% (10/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 43% (3/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (16/13) | 82% (17/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (16/2) | 18% (17/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (6/2) | 38% (8/3) |
Tommy Paul Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Tommy Paul
66%
(
68 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
95)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Lukas Klein
56%
(
58 of
104)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
78%
(
45 of
58)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
59%
(
27 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
31%
(
32 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
105
Total Points Won
87
|
6-7(5) 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Martin Damm
Player
Tommy Paul
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
0%
(
0 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
14 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
43
Total Points Won
43
|
4-6 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Daniil Medvedev
Player
Tommy Paul
62%
(
64 of
103)
1st Serve %
53%
(
53 of
100)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
48%
(
49 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
104
|
1-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Casper Ruud
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
67 of
94)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
40 of
67)
38%
(
15 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Luca Nardi
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Ugo Humbert
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Alex Michelsen
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Tommy Paul
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Tommy Paul
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
32%
(
24 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Karen Khachanov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R4 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Karen Khachanov
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
5
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
0
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
24 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Flavio Cobolli
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
89%
(
34 of
38)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
13 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Roberto Bautista Agut
65%
(
55 of
85)
1st Serve %
71%
(
64 of
90)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
25 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
90)
90
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Karen Khachanov
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Daniil Medvedev
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
8
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
3
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
39 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Cameron Norrie
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
46%
(
42 of
92)
13
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
36 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
92)
96
Total Points Won
84
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Karen Khachanov
73%
(
33 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
9
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Francisco Cerundolo
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
107)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
42 of
71)
55%
(
21 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
32 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
107)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
6-1 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karen Khachanov
Player
Laslo Djere
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
6
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Paul Vs Khachanov Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
