Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Max Purcell Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Etcheverry vs Purcell analysis and find out who is favored!
Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Max Purcell Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Etcheverry has won 49.83% of points on his second serve, while Purcell has won 51.93%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Etcheverry, in recent form, has won 48.99% of his opponent's second serve points, while Purcell has won 43.75%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.65% and 25.74% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Etcheverry has saved 64.54% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Purcell has saved 62.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Etcheverry has won 52.46% of matches played (W/L 32/ 29), with Purcell winning 42.11% (W/L 24/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Etcheverry has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 283/ 143), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 29% (W/L 2/ 5). Purcell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 203/ 141), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 20/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Etcheverry has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 51.72% of matches (W/L 15/ 14), where as Purcell has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 9/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Etcheverry winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Etcheverry winning 2 and Purcell winning 0. The last match between Etcheverry and Purcell was at the US Men's Clay Court Championship - Houston, 08-04-2023, Second, Clay with Tomas Martin Etcheverry getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:49:10.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Etcheverry and Purcell have played a deciding set 0 times, with Etcheverry winning 0 times and Purcell 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Etcheverry winning 1, and Purcell 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Etcheverry has played against opponents with an average rank of 137.7 while Purcell has played against players with an average rank of 183.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Etcheverry has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Purcell has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Etcheverry has converted 36.77% of breakpoint opportunities, and Purcell has converted 28.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Etcheverry 1 - 0 Purcell
28
Rank
27
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
84
Rank
40
High
26
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
Form
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
64% (325-186)
Career Total W/L
57% (273-204)
50% (12-12)
YTD W/L
35% (7-13)
$1,807,385
Career Prize Money
$936,175
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Etcheverry VS Purcell H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | Max Purcell |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:10 | 1:49:10 |
| 1st Serve % | 76% (50/66) | 56% (45/80) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (32/50) | 56% (25/45) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (7/16) | 43% (15/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (5/15) | 29% (2/7) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (40/80) | 41% (27/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Etcheverry VS Purcell H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-1 |
Stats 
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Max Purcell
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
45 of
80)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | Max Purcell |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (12/12) | 35% (7/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (29/26) | 37% (19/33) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (286/278) | 45% (225/279) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 29% (4/10) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 56% (10/8) | 50% (2/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.57 |
| Aces Total | 118 | 141 |
| DFs per game | 0.1 | 0.22 |
| DFs Total | 28 | 55 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:8:30 | 1:48:34 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 133.67 | 194.25 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (1229/1803) | 56% (886/1585) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (858/1229) | 71% (632/886) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (286/574) | 52% (363/699) |
| BPs Won% Total | 37% (57/155) | 28% (31/109) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (644/1795) | 32% (482/1503) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Masters W/L | 25% (1/3) | 25% (1/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 57% (8/6) | 36% (4/7) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (9/19) | 33% (6/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 63% (5/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 71% (14/10) | 67% (6/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 14% (14/2) | 33% (6/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 21% (14/3) |
Tomas Martin Etcheverry Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
72%
(
59 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
53 of
93)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
28 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaume Antoni Munar Clar
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
50%
(
25 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
84%
(
21 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
16%
(
8 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
8
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
3
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Casper Ruud
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
22 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Cameron Norrie
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
31 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(4) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Brandon Nakashima
67%
(
62 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
77 of
125)
6
Aces
14
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
53 of
77)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
31 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
46 of
125)
108
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Nick Hardt
79%
(
54 of
68)
1st Serve %
82%
(
49 of
60)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
0
52%
(
14 of
27)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Nicolas Jarry
77%
(
62 of
81)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Ben Shelton
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
69%
(
57 of
83)
1st Serve %
67%
(
65 of
97)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
0
84%
(
48 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
19 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
34 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
82
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Max Purcell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Egor Gerasimov
Player
Max Purcell
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Fajing Sun
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
52%
(
43 of
83)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
71
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Max Purcell
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
48%
(
30 of
62)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Max Purcell
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
62%
(
41 of
66)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
6 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Marcos Giron
52%
(
52 of
100)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
97)
6
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
56%
(
27 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
33 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
97)
99
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michael Mmoh
Player
Max Purcell
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
65)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Alex Michelsen
42%
(
44 of
105)
1st Serve %
69%
(
82 of
119)
8
Aces
13
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
54 of
82)
61%
(
37 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
34 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
45 of
119)
116
Total Points Won
108
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Max Purcell
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Max Purcell
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
43 of
84)
4
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Etcheverry Vs Purcell Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
