T. M. Etcheverry
To Win
H. Medjedovic
To Win
Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Denis Shapovalov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L L W L L L W L L
Form
W W W L W L W L L LHead-2-Head: Etcheverry 0 - 1 Shapovalov
They have played 2 sets in total, with Etcheverry winning 0 and Shapovalov winning 2. The last match between Etcheverry and Shapovalov was at the Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid, 26-04-2024, Second, Clay with Denis Shapovalov getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tomas Martin Etcheverry | 0 |
| Denis Shapovalov | 1 |
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid(26-04-2024)
| Etcheverry | Stats | Shapovalov |
|---|---|---|
| 41% (9-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 60% (12-8) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 51 | Ranking | 30 |
| 27 | Highest Rank | 10 |
| 25 | Age | 26 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 8 | Titles | 9 |
| 62% (354-217) | Career Total W/L | 60% (323-218) |
| $2,875,165 | Career Prize Money | $9,214,620 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
24 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Upcoming Match
TBD VS Shapovalov
- / Second
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Shnaider VS Volynets PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Michelsen VS Bublik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Etcheverry VS Shapovalov H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-3 |
Stats 
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
8
Aces
1
12
Double Faults
3
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
71)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
Etcheverry VS Shapovalov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 9 | Games Won | 13 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 12 |
| 2:3:42 | Average Match Time | 2:3:42 |
| 72% (51/71) | 1st Serve % | 58% (52/90) |
| 63% (32/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (40/52) |
| 50% (10/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (16/38) |
| 40% (2/5) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
| 38% (34/90) | Return Points Win % | 41% (29/71) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tomas Martin Etcheverry Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
14 of
50)
54
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Corentin Moutet
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
4-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
48%
(
31 of
65)
1st Serve %
54%
(
28 of
52)
3
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
0
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
24 of
28)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
19 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
17 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Diallo
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
48%
(
20 of
42)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
60%
(
65 of
109)
1st Serve %
67%
(
65 of
97)
6
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
47 of
65)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
33 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
97)
109
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 6-7(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Nicolas Mejia
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
9
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
30 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
59%
(
58 of
99)
1st Serve %
59%
(
71 of
121)
5
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
46 of
71)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
33 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
52 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Cristian Garin
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Denis Shapovalov Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Diego Dedura-Palomero
Player
Denis Shapovalov
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
22 of
27)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
40
|
7-6(2) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Denis Shapovalov
57%
(
54 of
95)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
79
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Taylor Fritz
Player
Denis Shapovalov
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
9
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
51%
(
55 of
108)
1st Serve %
67%
(
68 of
101)
6
Aces
8
11
Double Faults
1
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
49 of
68)
53%
(
28 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
39 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
101)
106
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 6-7(1) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Denis Shapovalov
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Adam Walton
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
30 of
47)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Denis Shapovalov
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
54%
(
51 of
94)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(3) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Marcos Giron
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
29 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Alex Michelsen
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Denis Shapovalov
Player
Nishesh Basavareddy
46%
(
26 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
6
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (354/217) | Win/Loss | 60% (323/218) |
| 59% (811/558) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (781/598) |
| 54% (7010/5986) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (7171/6459) |
| 48% (43/46) | Hard Win/Loss | 60% (140/95) |
| 66% (296/154) | Clay Win/Loss | 61% (77/49) |
| 57% (12/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62% (82/50) |
| 27% (3/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (24/24) |
| 0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.59 |
| 2266 | Aces Total | 3949 |
| 0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.41 |
| 839 | Total Double Faults | 2712 |
| 1:53:6 | Average Match Time | 1:41:31 |
| 359.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 301.04 |
| 67% (25664/38032) | 1st Serve % | 59% (23365/39811) |
| 69% (17776/25664) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (17709/23365) |
| 51% (6352/12368) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (8498/16445) |
| 42% (1687/4024) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (1291/3341) |
| 40% (15840/39255) | Return Points Win % | 36% (14666/40442) |
| 56% (20/16) | Slam W/L | 62% (47/29) |
| 37% (11/19) | Masters W/L | 56% (62/49) |
| 67% (4/2) | Cups W/L | 54% (19/16) |
| 50% (54/55) | Main Tour W/L | 54% (102/87) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67% (128/62) | Challenger W/L | 60% (33/22) |
| 69% (136/62) | Futures W/L | 80% (60/15) |
| 62% (333/533) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (269/453) |
| 53% (17/32) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 60% (49/82) |
| 50% (96/191) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (124/247) |
| 55% (102/187) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (101/176) |
| 83% (351/293) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (303/263) |
| 16% (351/56) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (303/40) |
| 26% (219/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (236/57) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
