Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Arthur Cazaux Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Recently, Cazaux has a slight advantage with 49.35% of points won on second serves compared to Etcheverry's 46.41%.
• Return Game Stats: When returning their opponents' second serve, Etcheverry slightly edges out by winning 45.99%, whereas Cazaux has a win rate of 44.6%. Who has the edge on first serve returns? They are quite close, with Cazaux at 24.84% and Etcheverry at 24.46%.
• Under Pressure: Cazaux saves breakpoints 62.76% of the time, narrowly outperforming Etcheverry's 61.29% in such situations.
• Performance Overview: Cazaux has a win rate of 53.85% over the past year, while Etcheverry stands at 44.44%. Does this indicate form advantage for Cazaux?
• Best Surface: Cazaux excels on hard courts with a 69% win rate, whereas Etcheverry is more comfortable on clay, winning 65% of his matches.
• Player Level: Cazaux has been successful in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a 64.71% win rate, while Etcheverry has a 43.33% success rate on the Main tour. Does this suggest Etcheverry faces tougher competition?
• Direct Head-to-Head: Etcheverry leads their matchups, having won both previous encounters and taking 5 out of 6 sets.
• Deciding Set Experience: Neither player has won a deciding set against each other, but overall, Cazaux has a slight edge with 53% wins compared to Etcheverry's 45% in all recent matches.
• Opponent Quality: Over the last year, Etcheverry has competed against higher-ranked players (average rank 84.52) compared to Cazaux (average rank 167.31).
• Break Point Conversion: Cazaux has converted 29% of breakpoints recently, slightly better than Etcheverry's 25.6%.

Editorial Prediction (July 16, 2025, UTC):

In upcoming matches, performance on second serves is crucial. Cazaux demonstrates strength here, winning just over 49% of points in recent form compared to Etcheverry’s 46%. This slight edge could be pivotal under pressure scenarios, where Cazaux also shows a slim superiority in saving breakpoints.

Return games are a close contest, although Etcheverry leads slightly in converting opponents' second serves. Historically, Etcheverry has outperformed Cazaux in direct meetings, winning both encounters and most sets. However, Cazaux often excels when matches extend into deciding sets.

While Etcheverry's head-to-head advantage should not be understated, Cazaux's recent upward trend, especially on hard courts where the match is likely to take place, could provide a competitive edge.

Taking into account both players’ strengths and recent performances, Cazaux appears to possess a marginal advantage and might be the likely winner of this upcoming match.