Tom Schonenberg vs Ivan Gakhov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Schonenberg vs I. Gakhov

Tom Schonenberg
GER
l
l
l
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
34
Age
29
6'1" (185 cm)
Height
6'3" (191 cm)
848
C. Rank
263
673
Best Rank
142
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$730
Career Money
$66.3K
Right-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed

Ivan Gakhov
RUS
w
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
34
Age
29
6'1" (185 cm)
Height
6'3" (191 cm)
848
C. Rank
263
673
Best Rank
142
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$730
Career Money
$66.3K
Right-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed
Head-to-head: Schonenberg 1 - 0 Gakhov
They have played 3 sets in total, with Tom Schonenberg winning 2 and Ivan Gakhov winning 1. The last match between Tom Schonenberg and Ivan Gakhov was at the Turkey F10, 09-03-2015, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Tom Schonenberg getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Schonenberg | 1 |
| Gakhov | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Turkey F10(03-09-15)
Tom Schonenberg
4
6
6
Ivan Gakhov
6
3
4
T. Schonenberg vs I. Gakhov H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $730 | Career Prize Money | $66,320 |
| 50.14% (179-178) | Career Total W/L | 60.75% (548-354) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 18 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
T. Schonenberg vs I. Gakhov Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tom Schonenberg has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ivan Gakhov has won 43.63%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tom Schonenberg, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ivan Gakhov has won 48.15%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 26.79% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tom Schonenberg has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ivan Gakhov has saved 55.31% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tom Schonenberg has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Ivan Gakhov winning 59.55% (W/L 53/36) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tom Schonenberg has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 78/76), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Ivan Gakhov has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 478/282), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
- Player level: In the last year, Tom Schonenberg has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Ivan Gakhov has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.00% of matches (W/L 24/26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tom Schonenberg winning 1 times and Ivan Gakhov being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Tom Schonenberg winning 2 and Ivan Gakhov winning 1.
- The last match between Tom Schonenberg and Ivan Gakhov was at the Turkey F10, 09-03-2015, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Tom Schonenberg getting the victory 4-6 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tom Schonenberg has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Ivan Gakhov has played against players with an average rank of 358.52.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tom Schonenberg has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ivan Gakhov has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tom Schonenberg has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ivan Gakhov has converted 31.99% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Tom Schonenberg vs Ivan Gakhov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Schonenberg vs I. Gakhov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Schonenberg 0%, Gakhov 48%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Schonenberg 0%, Gakhov 51%.
Break Points Saved %: Schonenberg 0%, Gakhov 63%.
T. Schonenberg Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 6-2 ret. | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q2 | W | 7-5 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 3-6 7-6(5) 11-9 | ||
I. Gakhov Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||

T. Schonenberg vs I. Gakhov Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.14% (179/178) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.75% (548/354) |
| 51.00% (407/391) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.97% (1226/889) |
| 51.73% (3951/3687) | Games Win/Loss | 52.85% (10601/9459) |
| 47.06% (32/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.26% (51/43) |
| 50.65% (78/76) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.89% (478/282) |
| 51.49% (69/65) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.43% (19/28) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 |
| 475 | Aces Total | 2683 |
| 0.07 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 249 | Total Double Faults | 2067 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:23:15 |
| 489.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 505.38 |
| 58% (3867/6615) | 1st Serve % | 61% (30753/50660) |
| 69% (2672/3867) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (21110/30753) |
| 49% (1351/2748) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (9897/19907) |
| 40% (240/604) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (2279/5435) |
| 38% (2473/6516) | Return Points Win % | 41% (21138/51667) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 75.00% (3/1) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Main Tour W/L | 32.00% (8/17) |
| 38.10% (8/13) | Challenger W/L | 50.50% (153/150) |
| 51.05% (170/163) | Futures W/L | 67.84% (384/182) |
| 50% (175/349) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (542/893) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 39% (37/95) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (156/287) |
| 42% (39/92) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (181/315) |
| 84% (183/154) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (518/451) |
| 16% (183/29) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (518/66) |
| 14% (174/25) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (384/95) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
04:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction02:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction05:00 AM 18/11/25
Prediction05:00 AM 18/11/25
Prediction06:30 AM 18/11/25
Prediction03:00 PM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
05:00
H2H 0-0
05:00
H2H 0-0
05:45
H2H 0-0
06:30
H2H 0-0
07:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal