Prediction of Tom Okker vs Quentin Pretorius Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
T. Okker vs Q. Pretorius

Tom Okker

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Quentin Pretorius

RSA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Okker 1 - 0 Pretorius

They have played 3 sets in total, with Tom Okker winning 3 and Quentin Pretorius winning 0. The last match between Tom Okker and Quentin Pretorius was at the Johannesburg, 24-03-1970, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Tom Okker getting the victory 6-1 6-2 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Okker	1
Pretorius	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) Johannesburg(03-24-70)

Stats

Tom Okker

Quentin Pretorius

T. Okker vs Q. Pretorius H2H Profile

T. Okker	Stats	Q. Pretorius
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
70.61% (668-278)	Career Total W/L	21.43% (3-11)
1	Hard	0
36	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

T. Okker vs Q. Pretorius Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tom Okker has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Quentin Pretorius has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tom Okker, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Quentin Pretorius has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Tom Okker has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Quentin Pretorius has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Tom Okker has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Quentin Pretorius winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Tom Okker has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 75% (W/L 109/36), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 174/77). Quentin Pretorius has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 75% (W/L 3/8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/2).
Player level: In the last year, Tom Okker has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Quentin Pretorius has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tom Okker winning 1 times and Quentin Pretorius being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Tom Okker winning 3 and Quentin Pretorius winning 0.
The last match between Tom Okker and Quentin Pretorius was at the Johannesburg, 24-03-1970, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Tom Okker getting the victory 6-1 6-2 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tom Okker has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Quentin Pretorius has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tom Okker has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Quentin Pretorius has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Tom Okker has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Quentin Pretorius has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Tom Okker vs Quentin Pretorius Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

T. Okker vs Q. Pretorius H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

T. Okker	Stats	Q. Pretorius
1	H2H Matches Won	0
3	Sets Won	0
18	Games Won	4
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑5 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

T. Okker Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Stockholm - 02-11-1981
R2 Tom GulliksonT. Gullikson	L	6-3 6-2	Stats
Basel - 12-10-1981
R3 Sean SorensenS. Sorensen	W	7-5 6-2	Stats
R4 Andres GomezA. Gomez	L	6-4 7-6	Stats
Tel Aviv - 05-10-1981
R3 Ilie NastaseI. Nastase	L	4-6 6-4 7-6	Stats
Gstaad - 06-07-1981
R3 Carlos KirmayrC. Kirmayr	L	6-2 6-0	Stats

View All

Q. Pretorius Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Dublin - 10-07-1972
R3 Ronan FearonR. Fearon	L	6-2 3-6 6-2	Stats
Johannesburg - 08-04-1972
R1 Michael PhillipsM. Phillips	L	6-2 2-6 6-3 6-1	Stats
Durban - 06-04-1970
R3 Harald ElschenbroichH. Elschenbroich	L	6-1 6-1	Stats
Johannesburg - 24-03-1970
R2 Tom OkkerT. Okker	L	6-1 6-2 6-1	Stats
Durban - 14-04-1969
R3 Bob CarmichaelB. Carmichael	L	6-1 6-2 6-0	Stats

View All

T. Okker vs Q. Pretorius Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

T. Okker	Stats	Q. Pretorius
70.61% (668/278)	YTD Win/Loss	21.43% (3/11)
65.60% (1606/842)	Sets Win/Loss	30.95% (13/29)
55.43% (13196/10609)	Games Win/Loss	38.29% (134/216)
69.32% (174/77)	Hard Win/Loss	27.27% (3/8)
72.79% (198/74)	Clay Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
66.67% (164/82)	Indoor Hard W/L	0% (0/0)
75.17% (109/36)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/1)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
487.55	Average Opponent Rank	232
70.87% (73/30)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
80.00% (40/10)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
45.45% (5/6)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
70.14% (545/232)	Main Tour W/L	21.43% (3/11)
100.00% (5/0)	Challenger W/L	0% (0/0)
71% (496/696)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	17% (1/6)
71% (163/231)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	25% (2/8)
67% (16/24)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
64% (156/243)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/2)
91% (620/563)	1st Set Won, Won Match	60% (5/3)
9% (620/57)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	40% (5/2)
30% (312/95)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (9/0)