Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Toby Samuel vs Learner Tien Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Samuel vs Tien analysis and find out who is favored!
Toby Samuel vs Learner Tien Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Samuel has won 35.09% of points on his second serve, while Tien has won 52.54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Samuel, in recent form, has won 56% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tien has won 54.98%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33% and 39.12% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Samuel has saved 59.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tien has saved 72.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Samuel has won 63.89% of matches played (W/L 23/ 13), with Tien winning 77.5% (W/L 31/ 9) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Samuel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 75% (W/L 18/ 6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 13/ 8). Tien has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 79% (W/L 11/ 3), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Samuel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 18/ 6), where as Tien has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 85.19% of matches (W/L 23/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Samuel winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Samuel winning 2 and Tien winning 0. The last match between Samuel and Tien was at the M15 Fayetteville, 06-11-2022, Final, Hard with Toby Samuel getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:10:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Samuel and Tien have played a deciding set 0 times, with Samuel winning 0 times and Tien 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Samuel winning 0, and Tien 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Samuel has played against opponents with an average rank of 273.5 while Tien has played against players with an average rank of 111.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Samuel has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tien has won 70% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Samuel has converted 63.64% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tien has converted 56.96% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Samuel 1 - 0 Tien
470
Rank
404
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
430
Rank
421
High
18
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
69% (45-20)
Career Total W/L
67% (46-23)
0% (0-1)
YTD W/L
57% (4-3)
$36,000
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Toby Samuel | Learner Tien |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:10:0 | 1:10:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (28/53) | 64% (36/56) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (21/28) | 56% (20/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (11/25) | 35% (7/20) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 52% (29/56) | 40% (21/53) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats 
Toby Samuel
Player
Learner Tien
53%
(
28 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Toby Samuel | Learner Tien |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 57% (4/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 56% (9/7) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (13/14) | 57% (87/66) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0.24 |
| Aces Total | 1 | 18 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 2 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:40:19 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 104.43 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (70/101) | 61% (301/493) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (44/70) | 66% (200/301) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 32% (10/31) | 54% (104/192) |
| BPs Won% Total | 56% (5/9) | 57% (28/49) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (38/82) | 44% (207/471) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 57% (4/7) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (4/4) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Toby Samuel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Fausto Tabacco
Player
Toby Samuel
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
101)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
44 of
70)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
38 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
101)
91
Total Points Won
92
|
7-5 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Joao Sousa
Player
Toby Samuel
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
59
|
3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andres Martin
Player
Toby Samuel
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
67
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Toby Samuel
Player
Ryan Seggerman
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
5
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
3
87%
(
52 of
60)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
44 of
56)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
25 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
21 of
81)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(6) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Blockx
Player
Toby Samuel
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Samuel
Player
Finn Bass
57%
(
55 of
96)
1st Serve %
69%
(
67 of
97)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
44 of
67)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
38%
(
36 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Toby Samuel
Player
Oscar Weightman
67%
(
66 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
90)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
36 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
32 of
90)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kyle Edmund
Player
Toby Samuel
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Toby Samuel
Player
Paul Jubb
69%
(
77 of
111)
1st Serve %
71%
(
75 of
105)
12
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
58 of
77)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
55 of
75)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
35 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
36 of
105)
112
Total Points Won
104
|
7-5 6-7(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Toby Samuel
Player
Tiran Sanghera
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
9
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
9 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Learner Tien Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Learner Tien
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Learner Tien
56%
(
59 of
106)
1st Serve %
68%
(
78 of
115)
11
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
85%
(
50 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
52 of
78)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
31%
(
33 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
115)
116
Total Points Won
105
|
7-6(4) 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Marco Trungelliti
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Giovanni Oradini
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
74%
(
17 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Learner Tien
69%
(
49 of
71)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
6
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Giovanni Oradini
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Maxwell Mckennon
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
55 of
79)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
84
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Jacob Fearnley
80%
(
4 of
5)
1st Serve %
50%
(
5 of
10)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
0%
(
0 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
11
Total Points Won
4
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Robert Cash
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
12 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Adam Neff
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Samuel Vs Tien Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
