Toby Samuel vs Jerry Roddick Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Samuel vs J. Roddick

Toby Samuel
GBR
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
23
Age
23
-
Height
-
266
C. Rank
0
266
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$36.0K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Jerry Roddick
USA
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
23
Age
23
-
Height
-
266
C. Rank
0
266
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$36.0K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Samuel 1 - 0 Roddick
They have played 2 sets in total, with Toby Samuel winning 2 and Jerry Roddick winning 0. The last match between Toby Samuel and Jerry Roddick was at the M25 Harlingen, 19-10-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Toby Samuel getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Samuel | 1 |
| Roddick | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Harlingen(10-19-22)
Toby Samuel
7
6
Jerry Roddick
5
3
T. Samuel vs J. Roddick H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $36,000 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 74.10% (103-36) | Career Total W/L | 50.00% (8-8) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 9 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Samuel vs J. Roddick Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Toby Samuel has won 43.02% of points on their second serve, while Jerry Roddick has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Toby Samuel, in recent form, has won 43.65% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jerry Roddick has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.19% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Toby Samuel has saved 48.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jerry Roddick has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Toby Samuel has won 78.08% of matches played (W/L 57/16), with Jerry Roddick winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Toby Samuel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 80% (W/L 68/17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 18/12). Jerry Roddick has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 80% (W/L 7/6), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/2).
- Player level: In the last year, Toby Samuel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 80.00% of matches (W/L 40/10), where as Jerry Roddick has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Toby Samuel winning 1 times and Jerry Roddick being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Toby Samuel winning 2 and Jerry Roddick winning 0.
- The last match between Toby Samuel and Jerry Roddick was at the M25 Harlingen, 19-10-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Toby Samuel getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Toby Samuel has played against opponents with an average rank of 392.6 while Jerry Roddick has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Toby Samuel has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jerry Roddick has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Toby Samuel has converted 29.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jerry Roddick has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Toby Samuel vs Jerry Roddick Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Samuel vs J. Roddick H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:32:0 | Average Match Time | 1:32:0 |
| 64% (37/58) | 1st Serve % | 68% (49/72) |
| 68% (25/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 47% (23/49) |
| 71% (15/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 65% (15/23) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (2/5) |
| 47% (34/72) | Return Points Win % | 31% (18/58) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Samuel 53%, Roddick 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Samuel 55%, Roddick 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Samuel 67%, Roddick 0%.
T. Samuel Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
F | W | 6-0 6-2 | ||
SF | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
QF | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-0 | ||
J. Roddick Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-5 6-1 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 6-0 | ||
Q1 | W | 1-6 6-3 10-3 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(2) 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 2-6 7-5 10-6 | ||

T. Samuel vs J. Roddick Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 74.10% (103/36) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (8/8) |
| 72.17% (223/86) | Sets Win/Loss | 47.22% (17/19) |
| 58.79% (1712/1200) | Games Win/Loss | 51.27% (182/173) |
| 80.00% (68/17) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.85% (7/6) |
| 75.00% (3/1) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 60.00% (18/12) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 70.00% (14/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.38 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 547 | Aces Total | 20 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 261 | Total Double Faults | 34 |
| 1:30:38 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 435.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 230.88 |
| 66% (5816/8864) | 1st Serve % | 61% (323/526) |
| 71% (4110/5816) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (197/323) |
| 52% (1594/3048) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (93/203) |
| 47% (451/957) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (24/57) |
| 43% (3792/8883) | Return Points Win % | 40% (208/523) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61.76% (21/13) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 78.64% (81/22) | Futures W/L | 50.00% (8/8) |
| 76% (103/136) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (8/16) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 58% (21/36) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 50% (15/30) | Deciding Set Win % | 75% (3/4) |
| 92% (106/97) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (7/6) |
| 8% (106/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (7/1) |
| 18% (33/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (9/2) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Thu, 18 Dec, 12:00 AM
PredictionWed, 17 Dec, 09:05 PM
PredictionThu, 18 Dec, 01:00 AM
PredictionWed, 17 Dec, 07:00 PM
PredictionWed, 17 Dec, 09:00 PM
PredictionWed, 17 Dec, 09:05 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

17 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Learner Tien vs Rafael Jodar Prediction – ATP Next Gen ATP Finals – 17th December 2025 Best Bets

17 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Landaluce Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

17 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Tien Vs Jodar H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

17 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Blockx Vs Engel H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

17 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Prizmic Vs Basavareddy H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

14 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Anhelina Kalinina vs Elsa Jacquemot Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 14th December 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
Martin Landaluce
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer
Dino Prizmic
Justin Engel
Alexander Blockx
Dino Prizmic
Learner Tien
Rafael Jodar
Learner Tien
Martin LandaluceSee All Today’s Tennis Predictions
21:00
H2H 0-0
H2H 0-0
H2H 0-0
19:00
H2H 0-0
H2H 0-0