Tobias Kamke vs Izak Van Der Merwe Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kamke vs Merwe analysis and find out who is favored!
Tobias Kamke vs Izak Van Der Merwe Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kamke has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Merwe has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kamke, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Merwe has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kamke has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Merwe has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kamke has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Merwe winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kamke has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 165/ 127), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 50% (W/L 123/ 123). Merwe has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kamke has played against opponents with an average rank of while Merwe has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kamke has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Merwe has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kamke has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Merwe has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kamke 0 - 0 Merwe
11
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
37
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
40
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Tobias Kamke | Izak Van Der Merwe |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0 | N/A |
Aces Total | 0 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0 | N/A |
DFs Total | 0 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tobias Kamke Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Marko Topo
Player
Tobias Kamke
48%
(
27 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
5
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Tobias Kamke
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
67%
(
16 of
24)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
34
Total Points Won
20
|
6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tobias Kamke
Player
Tiago Cacao
72%
(
91 of
126)
1st Serve %
65%
(
65 of
100)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
61 of
91)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
43 of
65)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
2 of
18)
37%
(
47 of
126)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
100)
119
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(7) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | w/o | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Tobias Kamke
Player
Marek Gengel
49%
(
44 of
89)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
47%
(
42 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Evgenii Tiurnev
Player
Tobias Kamke
54%
(
46 of
85)
1st Serve %
75%
(
80 of
107)
8
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
52 of
80)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
107)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tobias Kamke
Player
Marek Gengel
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ricardas Berankis
Player
Tobias Kamke
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
24 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tobias Kamke
Player
Henri Squire
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
8
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Tobias Kamke
53%
(
23 of
43)
1st Serve %
51%
(
30 of
59)
9
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
4
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Izak Van Der Merwe Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Louk Sorensen
Player
Izak van der Merwe
51%
(
27 of
53)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Cox
Player
Izak van der Merwe
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
58%
(
30 of
52)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 | 7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Ze Zhang
Player
Izak van der Merwe
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Liang-Chi Huang
Player
Izak van der Merwe
65%
(
59 of
91)
1st Serve %
64%
(
61 of
95)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
6
78%
(
46 of
59)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
46 of
61)
69%
(
22 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
23 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Izak van der Merwe
Player
N. Vijay Sundar Prashanth
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe
Player
Izak van der Merwe
82%
(
14 of
17)
1st Serve %
67%
(
18 of
27)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
13 of
18)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
4 of
17)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
24
Total Points Won
20
|
4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Gonzalo Lama
Player
Izak van der Merwe
58%
(
52 of
90)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
0%
(
0 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
33%
(
30 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
21 of
74)
81
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(3) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Izak van der Merwe
Player
Ivan Endara
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
6
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
0
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
26 of
62)
77
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H |
view more