Prediction of Timo Stodder vs Matic Spec Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Stodder vs M. Spec

Timo Stodder
GER
w
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
29
Age
30
-
Height
-
881
C. Rank
Ret.
257
Best Rank
710
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Matic Spec
SLO
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
29
Age
30
-
Height
-
881
C. Rank
Ret.
257
Best Rank
710
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Stodder 1 - 0 Spec
They have played 2 sets in total, with Timo Stodder winning 2 and Matic Spec winning 0. The last match between Timo Stodder and Matic Spec was at the M15 Bad Waltersdorf, 05-09-2021, Round: F, Surface: Clay, with Timo Stodder getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Stodder | 1 |
| Spec | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(F) M15 Bad Waltersdorf(09-05-21)
Timo Stodder
6
6
Matic Spec
3
4
T. Stodder vs M. Spec H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 64.84% (201-109) | Career Total W/L | 63.74% (167-95) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 7 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Stodder vs M. Spec Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Timo Stodder has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Matic Spec has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Timo Stodder, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Matic Spec has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Timo Stodder has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Matic Spec has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Timo Stodder has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Matic Spec winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Timo Stodder has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 21/10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 14/11). Matic Spec has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 68% (W/L 14/5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 94/59).
- Player level: In the last year, Timo Stodder has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Matic Spec has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Timo Stodder winning 1 times and Matic Spec being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Timo Stodder winning 2 and Matic Spec winning 0.
- The last match between Timo Stodder and Matic Spec was at the M15 Bad Waltersdorf, 05-09-2021, Round: F, Surface: Clay, with Timo Stodder getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:48:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Timo Stodder has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Matic Spec has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Timo Stodder has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Matic Spec has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Timo Stodder has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Matic Spec has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Timo Stodder vs Matic Spec Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Stodder vs M. Spec H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:48:0 | Average Match Time | 1:48:0 |
| 51% (38/75) | 1st Serve % | 56% (33/59) |
| 55% (21/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (21/33) |
| 57% (21/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (9/26) |
| 42% (5/12) | Break Pts Won % | 27% (3/11) |
| 49% (29/59) | Return Points Win % | 44% (33/75) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Stodder 0%, Spec 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Stodder 0%, Spec 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Stodder 0%, Spec 0%.
T. Stodder Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 0-6 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | ||
M. Spec Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 1-6 7-5 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 4-6 6-2 7-6(0) | ||
R2 | L | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 5-7 6-3 | ||

T. Stodder vs M. Spec Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64.84% (201/109) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.74% (167/95) |
| 62.43% (427/257) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.12% (364/222) |
| 55.15% (3452/2807) | Games Win/Loss | 55.49% (3011/2415) |
| 67.74% (21/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.44% (94/59) |
| 65.60% (164/86) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.56% (59/31) |
| 55.17% (16/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 73.68% (14/5) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 447 | Aces Total | 440 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 638 | Total Double Faults | 485 |
| 1:19:18 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 441.15 | Average Opponent Rank | 418.83 |
| 59% (9954/16901) | 1st Serve % | 58% (5307/9198) |
| 65% (6490/9954) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (3634/5307) |
| 51% (3519/6946) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (1944/3893) |
| 46% (930/2002) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (440/1041) |
| 44% (7471/16933) | Return Points Win % | 42% (3922/9317) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 47.06% (32/36) | Challenger W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 70.12% (169/72) | Futures W/L | 64.09% (166/93) |
| 64% (195/303) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (163/258) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 58% (40/69) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (31/55) |
| 57% (37/65) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (30/64) |
| 93% (188/175) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (162/147) |
| 7% (188/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (162/15) |
| 21% (122/26) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (100/19) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Fri, 21 Nov, 08:00 PM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 04:10 AM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 11:45 AM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 01:05 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 05:00 PM
PredictionSat, 22 Nov, 01:30 AM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Sydney Challenger Preview And Prediction: James McCabe vs Rinky Hijikata Betting Tips & Picks November 21, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Bennemann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Bergamo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Mark Lajal vs Justin Engel Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Jaume Antoni Munar Clar vs Jiri Lehecka Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ESP – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →LP Open by IND – Colina Preview And Prediction: Laura Pigossi vs Leolia Jeanjean Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025
Top Predictions Today
04:10
H2H 1-1
14:00
H2H 1-0
20:00
H2H 0-1
12:05
H2H 0-0
15:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal