Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Timo Legout vs Dan Added Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Legout vs Added analysis and find out who is favored!
Timo Legout vs Dan Added Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Legout has won 47.44% of points on his second serve, while Added has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Legout, in recent form, has won 57.79% of his opponent's second serve points, while Added has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.34% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Legout has saved 58.54% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Added has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Legout has won 62.5% of matches played (W/L 15/ 9), with Added winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Legout has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 56/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 8/ 13). Added has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Legout has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.22% of matches (W/L 15/ 8), where as Added has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Legout winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Legout winning 2 and Added winning 1. The last match between Legout and Added was at the M15 Sibenik, 21-05-2021, Quarterfinals, Clay with Timo Legout getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:36:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Legout and Added have played a deciding set 1 times, with Legout winning 1 times and Added 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Legout winning 0, and Added 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Legout has played against opponents with an average rank of 179.92 while Added has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Legout has won 80% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Added has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Legout has converted 54.55% of breakpoint opportunities, and Added has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Legout 1 - 0 Added
688
Rank
406
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
408
Rank
240
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
58% (87-62)
Career Total W/L
58% (261-192)
80% (4-1)
YTD W/L
43% (10-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$34,000
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Timo Legout | Dan Added |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 18 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:36:0 | 2:36:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (60/97) | 57% (62/108) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (36/60) | 53% (33/62) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (21/37) | 57% (26/46) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 46% (6/13) | 71% (5/7) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (49/108) | 41% (40/97) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 5-7 6-4 |
Stats 
Timo Legout
Player
Dan Added
62%
(
60 of
97)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
108)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
49 of
108)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Timo Legout | Dan Added |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (8/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (72/57) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 11 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 15 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:36 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 219.2 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (253/409) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (171/253) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (74/156) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (24/44) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 44% (171/386) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 80% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Timo Legout Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Brandon Holt
Player
Timo Legout
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 6-7(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Karue Sell
53%
(
40 of
75)
1st Serve %
42%
(
28 of
67)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Trevor Svajda
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
87)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
42 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
46 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Ethan Quinn
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lorenzo Carboni
Player
Timo Legout
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
28 of
42)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Niccolo Baroni
50%
(
32 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Gabriele Pennaforti
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Timo Legout
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Jeremy Jahn
77%
(
75 of
98)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
104)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
22%
(
5 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
70%
(
7 of
10)
48%
(
47 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
104)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Dan Added Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
Player
Dan Added
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
6
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
2
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
31%
(
11 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
47%
(
47 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Dan Added
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
50%
(
55 of
109)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
21 of
54)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
38 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
109)
104
Total Points Won
96
|
7-5 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Neil Oberleitner
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rafael Izquierdo Luque
Player
Dan Added
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
72
|
6-1 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Imanol Lopez Morillo
Player
Dan Added
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
45%
(
38 of
85)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Siddharth Vishwakarma
Player
Dan Added
55%
(
66 of
120)
1st Serve %
49%
(
55 of
112)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
57%
(
31 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
44 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
39 of
112)
115
Total Points Won
117
|
7-6(4) 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
57%
(
17 of
30)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
12 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
40
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Dan Added
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
11
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Dan Added
77%
(
88 of
114)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
97)
1
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
4
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
41 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
97)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
view more
Legout Vs Added Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
