Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tim Smyczek vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Smyczek vs Gimeno-Traver analysis and find out who is favored!
Tim Smyczek vs Daniel Gimeno-Traver Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Smyczek has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Gimeno-Traver has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Smyczek, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Gimeno-Traver has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Smyczek has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gimeno-Traver has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Smyczek has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Gimeno-Traver winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Smyczek has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 92/ 60), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 42/ 49). Gimeno-Traver has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 578/ 369), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 6/ 22).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Smyczek winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Smyczek winning 3 and Gimeno-Traver winning 1. The last match between Smyczek and Gimeno-Traver was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 19-01-2016, First, Hard with Tim Smyczek getting the victory 1100036706.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:54:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Smyczek and Gimeno-Traver have played a deciding set 0 times, with Smyczek winning 0 times and Gimeno-Traver 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Smyczek winning 0, and Gimeno-Traver 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Smyczek has played against opponents with an average rank of while Gimeno-Traver has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Smyczek has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gimeno-Traver has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Smyczek has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gimeno-Traver has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Smyczek 1 - 0 Gimeno-Traver
Ret.
Rank
68
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
48
High
38
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
56% (485-383)
Career Total W/L
57% (625-479)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,179,844
Career Prize Money
$1,102,200
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Smyczek VS Gimeno-Traver H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Tim Smyczek | Daniel Gimeno-Traver |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 1 |
| Games Won | 21 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:0 | 1:54:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (57/92) | 67% (60/89) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (45/57) | 68% (41/60) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 71% (25/35) | 48% (14/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 20% (1/5) |
| Return Points W% | 38% (34/89) | 24% (22/92) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Smyczek VS Gimeno-Traver H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 3-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Tim Smyczek
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
62%
(
57 of
92)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
71%
(
25 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
24%
(
22 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
104
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tim Smyczek | Daniel Gimeno-Traver |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tim Smyczek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Milos Raonic
Player
Tim Smyczek
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
16
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Smyczek
Player
Matthew Ebden
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tim Smyczek
Player
Norbert Gombos
62%
(
72 of
117)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
103)
15
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
6
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
45 of
63)
44%
(
20 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
41 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
103)
111
Total Points Won
109
|
7-6(5) 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tim Smyczek
Player
Ramkumar Ramanathan
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
9 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mischa Zverev
Player
Tim Smyczek
72%
(
53 of
74)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
19 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
21 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tim Smyczek
Player
John-Patrick Smith
59%
(
55 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
8
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
111)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tim Smyczek
Player
Mitchell Krueger
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jared Hiltzik
Player
Tim Smyczek
60%
(
43 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
8
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Tim Smyczek
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tim Smyczek
Player
Mitchell Krueger
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
62%
(
38 of
61)
5
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
28 of
38)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Gimeno-Traver Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
37%
(
18 of
49)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mario Vilella Martinez
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Galovic
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
17%
(
6 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Pol Toledo Bague
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
5
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabien Reboul
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
12
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Smyczek Vs Gimeno-Traver Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
