Tilwith Di Girolami vs Fiona Crawley Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Performance statistics offer useful insights into the upcoming tennis match between Crawley and Girolami. Assessing their second serve performance over the last six months, Crawley secured 37.81% of his second serve points, while Girolami achieved a slightly higher success rate at 39.08%. This statistic can significantly influence match predictions.

Return game statistics reveal further differences in their play. Crawley has won 52.73% of his opponent's second serve points recently, which is a bit above Girolami's 51.25%. In first serve return points, Girolami leads slightly with 35.72% compared to Crawley's 32.97%. These figures are often reliable indicators for determining the favored player in head-to-head matchups.

Analyzing their performance under pressure, particularly breakpoint saves, provides additional context. Crawley has saved 47.24% of breakpoints faced recently, whereas Girolami has been more successful, saving 51.61%. This data is valuable for making in-game betting predictions when players face breakpoints.

Taking a broader view of their performances, over the last year, Crawley has claimed victory in 57.69% of his matches (15 wins and 11 losses), whereas Girolami has won exactly half of his matches, with a win-loss record of 25-25. This head-to-head overview forms the basis for overall match predictions.

The players' career performances on different surfaces are also key considerations. Crawley excels on hard courts with a win percentage of 71% (40 wins, 16 losses), while he has struggled on clay, with no wins out of three matches. Girolami also fares best on hard courts, winning 56% (32 wins, 25 losses), but has a lower success rate of 40% on indoor hard courts (6 wins, 9 losses).

Examining player levels provides context to these stats. Crawley has primarily competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, securing victory in 44.44% of matches (8 wins, 10 losses), whereas Girolami has mostly participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at $10K, winning 51.61% (16 wins, 15 losses). Event level plays a role in evaluating player statistics.

Opponent quality, too, is a factor; Crawley has faced opponents with an average rank of 519.35 over the past year, whereas Girolami's adversaries have had an average rank of 358.68. If the match extends to a deciding set, Crawley has been more favorable, winning 45% of them, compared to Girolami's 36% in such scenarios.

Both players have closely matched breakpoint conversion rates, with Crawley converting 38% of his chances and Girolami doing slightly better at 38.52%. This stat becomes particularly important in live betting when a player has opportunities to break serve.

Based on these comprehensive statistics, the slightly better recent performance and surface adaptability position Girolami as the probable winner of this match.