Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tianmi Mi vs Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mi vs Hennemann analysis and find out who is favored!
Tianmi Mi vs Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mi has won 42.27% of points on his second serve, while Hennemann has won 44.4%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mi, in recent form, has won 56.93% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hennemann has won 56.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 44.12% and 47.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mi has saved 58.93% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hennemann has saved 48.58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mi has won 54% of matches played (W/L 27/ 23), with Hennemann winning 65.15% (W/L 43/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mi has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 70% (W/L 26/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 32/ 23). Hennemann has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 14/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 26/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Mi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 18/ 18), where as Hennemann has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.29% of matches (W/L 19/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mi winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Mi winning 2 and Hennemann winning 0. The last match between Mi and Hennemann was at the W15 Manacor, 02-03-2023, Second, Hard with Tianmi Mi getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mi and Hennemann have played a deciding set 0 times, with Mi winning 0 times and Hennemann 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Mi winning 0, and Hennemann 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mi has played against opponents with an average rank of 276.38 while Hennemann has played against players with an average rank of 264.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mi has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hennemann has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mi has converted 54% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hennemann has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mi 1 - 0 Hennemann
660
Rank
639
High
19
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
447
Rank
283
High
23
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
62% (58-35)
Career Total W/L
62% (157-96)
58% (11-8)
YTD W/L
77% (23-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tianmi Mi | Caijsa Wilda Hennemann |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:0 | 1:28:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (32/55) | 60% (36/60) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (21/32) | 64% (23/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (10/23) | 21% (5/24) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (32/60) | 44% (24/55) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Tianmi Mi
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tianmi Mi | Caijsa Wilda Hennemann |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 58% (11/8) | 77% (23/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (26/17) | 75% (49/16) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (200/160) | 58% (355/253) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 89% (8/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 79% (11/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0.11 |
| Aces Total | 18 | 33 |
| DFs per game | 0.47 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 83 | 55 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:22 | 1:40:28 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 165.74 | 269.3 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (785/1251) | 69% (1193/1729) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (470/785) | 63% (746/1193) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (197/466) | 45% (239/536) |
| BPs Won% Total | 54% (81/150) | 51% (144/285) |
| Return Pts W% | 49% (549/1125) | 52% (885/1714) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (8/4) | 60% (6/4) |
| Futures W/L | 43% (3/4) | 88% (15/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (11/17) | 77% (23/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 92% (25/23) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 8% (25/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (5/0) |
Tianmi Mi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Wushuang Zheng
Player
Tianmi Mi
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
85)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
21 of
59)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
50 of
85)
91
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tianmi Mi
Player
Yi Tsen Cho
74%
(
99 of
134)
1st Serve %
53%
(
56 of
106)
2
Aces
6
12
Double Faults
8
68%
(
67 of
99)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
41%
(
55 of
134)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
124
Total Points Won
116
|
6-3 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tianmi Mi
Player
Unknown Player
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Meng Yi Chen
Player
Tianmi Mi
84%
(
71 of
85)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
56 of
103)
100
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Neilson Gatenby
Player
Tianmi Mi
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
92)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
10
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marie Weckerle
Player
Tianmi Mi
55%
(
12 of
22)
1st Serve %
70%
(
23 of
33)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
6 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
34
Total Points Won
21
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tianmi Mi
Player
Vlada Zvereva
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
78%
(
73 of
93)
2
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
38 of
73)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
47 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
46 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
94
|
6-3 6-7(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tianmi Mi
Player
Diana Yakovleva
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
42%
(
26 of
62)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ylena In-Albon
Player
Tianmi Mi
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve %
67%
(
4 of
6)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
9
Total Points Won
5
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tianmi Mi
Player
Daniela Vismane
74%
(
48 of
65)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Sina Herrmann
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Marcelina Podlinska
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
85%
(
61 of
72)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
47%
(
27 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
41 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Tessa Johanna Brockmann
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Despina Papamichail
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
70%
(
56 of
80)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
34%
(
10 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
44 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
91
Total Points Won
85
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Louisa Chirico
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
20%
(
4 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
Player
Mina Hodzic
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
29 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Caijsa Wilda Hennemann
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Mi Vs Hennemann Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
