Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Thiemo De Bakker vs Adrian Menendez-Maceiras Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bakker vs Menendez-Maceiras analysis and find out who is favored!
Thiemo De Bakker vs Adrian Menendez-Maceiras Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bakker has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Menendez-Maceiras has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bakker, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Menendez-Maceiras has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bakker has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Menendez-Maceiras has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bakker has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Menendez-Maceiras winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bakker has played against opponents with an average rank of while Menendez-Maceiras has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bakker has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Menendez-Maceiras has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bakker has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Menendez-Maceiras has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bakker 0 - 0 Menendez-Maceiras
N/A
Rank
High
35
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
38
Age
R
Plays
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Bakker VS Menendez-Maceiras H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Thiemo De Bakker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Etienne Donnet
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
8
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Florian Broska
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
47%
(
40 of
86)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Niklas Waldner
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
32 of
38)
87%
(
20 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
8
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
39%
(
23 of
59)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Toby Martin
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
20)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
108)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
16 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
103
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
51%
(
62 of
121)
1st Serve %
56%
(
65 of
116)
9
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
0
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
44 of
65)
59%
(
35 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
41 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
42 of
116)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
6-7(4) 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Abedallah Shelbayh
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
31 of
51)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Daniil Glinka
67%
(
62 of
92)
1st Serve %
61%
(
55 of
90)
3
Aces
16
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
30 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
90)
93
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Skander Mansouri
71%
(
67 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
0
Aces
16
1
Double Faults
6
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
105)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Ben Jones
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
9
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Mensik
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
43%
(
20 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
Player
Matthew William Donald
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicola Kuhn
Player
Adrian Menendez-Maceiras
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Bakker Vs Menendez-Maceiras Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
