S. Mochizuki
To Win
T. M. Monteiro
To Win
Thiago Moura Monteiro vs Emilio Nava Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W W W L L W L
Form
W W W W W W W W L LHead-2-Head: Monteiro 1 - 1 Nava
They have played 4 sets in total, with Monteiro winning 2 and Nava winning 2. The last match between Monteiro and Nava was at the Asuncion Challenger, 24-03-2025, Final, Clay with Emilio Nava getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Thiago Moura Monteiro | 1 |
| Emilio Nava | 1 |
Asuncion Challenger(24-03-2025)
7
5
6
3
| Monteiro | Stats | Nava |
|---|---|---|
| 59% (16-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 74% (31-11) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 94 | Ranking | 132 |
| 61 | Highest Rank | 124 |
| 30 | Age | 23 |
| L | Plays | R |
| 14 | Titles | 6 |
| 57% (523-388) | Career Total W/L | 60% (219-148) |
| $1,758,150 | Career Prize Money | $442,385 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
28 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Stearns PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Keys VS Vekic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-3 |
Stats 
Emilio Nava
Player
Thiago Moura Monteiro
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
11
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Emilio Nava
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 20 | Games Won | 16 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 14 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:16:30 | Average Match Time | 1:16:30 |
| 62% (62/100) | 1st Serve % | 66% (67/102) |
| 76% (47/62) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (49/67) |
| 50% (19/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (15/35) |
| 50% (6/12) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 33% (3/9) |
| 37% (38/102) | Return Points Win % | 34% (34/100) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Thiago Moura Monteiro Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Thiago Moura Monteiro
49%
(
57 of
116)
1st Serve %
65%
(
71 of
109)
12
Aces
6
10
Double Faults
2
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
55 of
71)
58%
(
34 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
34%
(
40 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
35 of
109)
111
Total Points Won
114
|
2-6 7-6(5) 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Mitchell Krueger
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Thiago Moura Monteiro
60%
(
64 of
107)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
42 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
100
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 6-7(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Thiago Moura Monteiro
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
11
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Alvaro Guillen Meza
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
30 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Mariano Kestelboim
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
6
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
38%
(
36 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
103
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Remy Bertola
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
44 of
76)
3
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
6
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
67
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Thiago Moura Monteiro
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
14
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Ignacio Buse
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
27 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Joel Schwaerzler
Player
Emilio Nava
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Chris Rodesch
Player
Emilio Nava
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
96)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
95
Total Points Won
89
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Mathys Erhard
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Murphy Cassone
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Christian Sigsgaard
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
79)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Liam Draxl
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
75%
(
56 of
75)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Eliot Spizzirri
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
32 of
46)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
25 of
74)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Tomas Barrios Vera
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
67%
(
62 of
92)
6
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
90
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Gabi Adrian Boitan
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (523/388) | Win/Loss | 60% (219/148) |
| 55% (1225/998) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (486/377) |
| 52% (11311/10514) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (4365/4060) |
| 49% (80/84) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (89/73) |
| 60% (426/279) | Clay Win/Loss | 68% (100/47) |
| 39% (9/14) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55% (28/23) |
| 42% (8/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.52 |
| 3353 | Aces Total | 2139 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 1644 | Total Double Faults | 1037 |
| 1:31:54 | Average Match Time | 1:36:39 |
| 474.3 | Average Opponent Rank | 370.54 |
| 65% (36578/56667) | 1st Serve % | 63% (15829/25307) |
| 71% (26044/36578) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (11224/15829) |
| 52% (10513/20088) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4880/9478) |
| 41% (1976/4863) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (941/2254) |
| 37% (21116/57084) | Return Points Win % | 38% (9600/25372) |
| 39% (22/34) | Slam W/L | 55% (12/10) |
| 46% (22/26) | Masters W/L | 40% (8/12) |
| 50% (13/13) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (111/115) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (9/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 64% (260/147) | Challenger W/L | 62% (142/88) |
| 65% (95/51) | Futures W/L | 65% (48/26) |
| 58% (503/861) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (214/358) |
| 29% (12/41) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 43% (3/7) |
| 54% (222/409) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (76/157) |
| 54% (188/351) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (74/121) |
| 81% (511/413) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (204/176) |
| 19% (511/98) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (204/28) |
| 27% (399/108) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (163/42) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
