Thasaporn Naklo vs Caroline Werner Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Oct at 12:42 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Naklo vs C. Werner

 THA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

 GER
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Naklo 0 - 1 Werner
They have played 2 sets in total, with Thasaporn Naklo winning 0 and Caroline Werner winning 2. The last match between Caroline Werner and Thasaporn Naklo was at the Chennai Open - Chennai, 26-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Caroline Werner getting the victory 6-3 7-6(4).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Naklo | 0 | 
| Werner | 1 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) Chennai Open - Chennai(10-26-25)
T. Naklo vs C. Werner H2H Profile
T. Naklo vs C. Werner Match Preview:
- Thasaporn Naklo and Caroline Werner have similar second serve performance in recent form, with Naklo at 40.74% and Werner slightly better at 40.79%.
- In return games, Naklo is stronger in returning second serves, winning 50.72% of these points compared to Werner's 46.36%.
- When comparing first serve returns, Werner edges out Naklo at 35.22% against Naklo's 33.71%.
- Under pressure, Werner has a better breakpoint save rate at 49.32%, whereas Naklo saves 41.67% of breakpoints.
- Overall match performance in the last year shows Werner with a 58.18% win rate, outperforming Naklo, who has a 40.00% win rate.
- Surface specialization reveals Naklo performs best on indoor hard courts (67%), while Werner excels on clay (67%).
- At the $10K Challenger/ITF level, Werner exhibits higher performance with a 57.45% win rate against Naklo’s 37.93%.
- When considering opponent quality, Werner's opponents had an average rank of 320.25, indicating tougher competition compared to Naklo's average opponent rank of 489.1.
- Deciding set statistics indicate Werner wins 45% of deciding sets, slightly outpacing Naklo's 42% success rate.
Editorial Prediction (October 26, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent performance data between the two players, Caroline Werner demonstrates a slight edge in critical areas such as breakpoint saves and first-serve return effectiveness. This suggests she is more composed under pressure and can capitalize more often on return opportunities.
Thasaporn Naklo, while strong in returning second serves, lacks Werner's overall consistency and has competed against opponents with a lower average rank. Thus, Werner's experience against tougher competitors gives her a potential advantage.
Both players have surfaces they excel on, with Naklo better on indoor hard courts while Werner thrives on clay. However, Werner's recent overall win rate and match experience provide her with a stronger outlook for this match.
Taking these factors into account, especially Werner's better performance against higher-ranked players and her stronger pressure play, Caroline Werner is likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming encounter.
Thasaporn Naklo vs Caroline Werner Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Naklo vs C. Werner H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 | 
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 | 
| 9 | Games Won | 13 | 
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 | 
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 0 | 
| 1:29:13 | Average Match Time | 1:29:13 | 
| 69% (45/65) | 1st Serve % | 73% (48/66) | 
| 49% (22/45) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (33/48) | 
| 45% (9/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (7/18) | 
| 67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 56% (5/9) | 
| 39% (26/66) | Return Points Win % | 52% (34/65) | 
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
Recent Performance Stats
T. Naklo Recent Matches Played
C. Werner Recent Matches Played

T. Naklo vs C. Werner Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.56% (85/68) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.17% (287/215) | 
| 55.82% (187/148) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.77% (650/495) | 
| 53.25% (1566/1375) | Games Win/Loss | 53.39% (5493/4795) | 
| 53.96% (75/64) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.59% (75/53) | 
| 0.00% (0/1) | Clay Win/Loss | 58.58% (181/128) | 
| 76.92% (10/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47.69% (31/34) | 
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 | 
| 318 | Aces Total | 501 | 
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 | 
| 466 | Total Double Faults | 880 | 
| 1:20:48 | Average Match Time | 1st Match | 
| 420.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 523.73 | 
| 56% (4774/8525) | 1st Serve % | 64% (12633/19780) | 
| 62% (2978/4774) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (7641/12633) | 
| 46% (1707/3751) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3244/7147) | 
| 49% (544/1110) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1273/2598) | 
| 46% (3974/8565) | Return Points Win % | 48% (9210/19305) | 
| 28.57% (2/5) | Main Tour W/L | 62.50% (5/3) | 
| 50.54% (47/46) | Challenger W/L | 56.38% (159/123) | 
| 67.92% (36/17) | Futures W/L | 58.02% (123/89) | 
| 55% (83/150) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (285/494) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) | 
| 33% (7/21) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 61% (49/80) | 
| 40% (12/30) | Deciding Set Win % | 48% (69/145) | 
| 87% (85/74) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (293/251) | 
| 13% (85/11) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (293/41) | 
| 16% (68/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (209/36) | 












