Tereza Martincova vs Aliona Falei Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Aliona Falei has a slightly weaker second serve performance, winning 34.66% of points, compared to Tereza Martincova's 37.20%. Could this give Martincova an edge in the match?
• Return game stats indicate a stronger performance for Aliona Falei, who wins 53.94% of opponents' second serve points, outperforming Tereza Martincova's 48.35%.
• Both players display similar capabilities in first serve returns, with Falei at 35.67% and Martincova at 33.27%.
• Under pressure, Aliona Falei has a slight advantage, saving 49.11% of breakpoints compared to Tereza Martincova's 47.90%.
• Tereza Martincova has a better overall match win rate over the past year at 61.76% compared to Aliona Falei's 58.00%.
• Both players excel on indoor hard courts with a 67% win rate but struggle equally on grass with a 50% win rate.
• Considering tournament levels, Martincova has a marginally higher win percentage at the Challengers/ITF > $10K level, indicating a slight edge in match experience.
• Martincova has faced tougher opponents over the last year, with an average ranking of 333.41, compared to Falei’s opponents at an average rank of 380.94.
• Deciding set victories demonstrate both players are evenly matched, with Falei winning 41% and Martincova 43% of deciding sets.
• Aliona Falei outshines Martincova in breakpoint conversion with a slightly higher success rate of 43.10% versus 40.50%.

Editorial Prediction (November 25, 2025, UTC):

In evaluating the upcoming match, several key statistics provide insight into the potential outcome. Tereza Martincova's superior second serve performance and experience against higher-ranked opponents suggest an advantage. Her slightly better overall match win percentage further supports this.

However, Aliona Falei's stronger return game and breakpoint conversion offer her a competitive edge, suggesting that she could excel in specific pressure situations. Both players exhibit comparable strengths on their preferred surface, indoor hard courts.

While both competitors bring strengths to the table, Tereza Martincova emerges as the likely winner based on her experience with tougher opponents and consistent performance metrics. She has a slight advantage in several critical areas that may make the difference in the match.