Terence Atmane vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
T. Atmane vs B. Van De Zandschulp

Terence Atmane

FRA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

C. Rank

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

$765.3K

Career Money

$3.7M

Plays

Right-Handed

Botic Van De Zandschulp

NED

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

6'2" (188 cm)

C. Rank

Best Rank

Total Titles

Ytd Titles

$765.3K

Career Money

$3.7M

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-To-Head: Atmane 1 - 0 Zandschulp

They have played 2 sets in total, with Terence Atmane winning 2 and Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 0. The last match between Terence Atmane and Botic Van De Zandschulp was at the China Open - Beijing, 24-09-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(5) 7-6(7).

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Atmane	1
Zandschulp	0

Last H2H Matches:

(Q3) China Open - Beijing(09-24-25)

Stats

Terence Atmane

Botic Van De Zandschulp

T. Atmane vs B. V. D. Zandschulp H2H Profile

T. Atmane	Stats	B. V. D. Zandschulp
$765,265	Career Prize Money	$3,676,420
61.18% (238-151)	Career Total W/L	61.17% (378-240)
1	Hard	0
9	Titles	7
1	Total H2H Matches	0
50.00% (7-7)	YTD Win/Loss	45.16% (14-17)

T. Atmane vs B. V. D. Zandschulp Match Preview

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Terence Atmane has won 46.31% of points on their second serve, while Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 42.02%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Terence Atmane, in recent form, has won 45.17% of their opponent's second serve points, while Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 46.33%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.82% and 26.37% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Terence Atmane has saved 61.94% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Botic Van De Zandschulp has saved 54.17% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Terence Atmane has won 55.71% of matches played (W/L 39/ 31), with Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 50.00% (W/L 39/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Terence Atmane has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 187/ 99), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8). Botic Van De Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 93/ 55), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 44% (W/L 12/ 15).
Player level: In the last year, Terence Atmane has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.46% of matches (W/L 22/ 15), where as Botic Van De Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 52.78% of matches (W/L 19/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Terence Atmane winning 1 times and Botic Van De Zandschulp being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Terence Atmane winning 2 and Botic Van De Zandschulp winning 0. The last match between Terence Atmane and Botic Van De Zandschulp was at the China Open - Beijing, 24-09-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(5) 7-6(7).
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:14:28.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Terence Atmane has played against opponents with an average rank of 205.76 while Botic Van De Zandschulp has played against players with an average rank of 140.92.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Terence Atmane has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Botic Van De Zandschulp has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Terence Atmane has converted 32.29% of breakpoint opportunities, and Botic Van De Zandschulp has converted 34.59% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Terence Atmane vs Botic Van De Zandschulp Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

T. Atmane vs B. V. D. Zandschulp H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

T. Atmane	Stats	B. V. D. Zandschulp
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
14	Games Won	12
5	Aces (Total)	8
3	Total Double Faults	2
2:14:28	Avg. Match Time	2:14:28
64% (57/89)	1st Serve %	68% (64/94)
75% (43/57)	1st Serve Win %	72% (46/64)
50% (16/32)	2nd Serve Win %	47% (14/30)
14% (1/7)	Break Pts Won %	33% (1/3)
36% (34/94)	Return Pts Won %	34% (30/89)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won → Match Won	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won → Match Lost	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost → Match Won	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

T. Atmane Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
China Open - Beijing - 22-09-2025
R2 Jannik SinnerJ. Sinner	L	6-4 5-7 6-0	Stats
R1 Zhizhen ZhangZ. Zhang	W	6-4 6-2	Stats
Q3 Botic Van De ZandschulpB. Van	W	7-6(5) 7-6(7)	Stats
Q1 Fajing SunF. Sun	W	6-4 6-1	Stats
Chengdu Open - Chengdu - 15-09-2025
R1 Dino PrizmicD. Prizmic	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

B. V. D. Zandschulp Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
China Open - Beijing - 22-09-2025
Q3 Terence AtmaneT. Atmane	L	7-6(5) 7-6(7)	Stats
Q1 Christopher O'ConnellC. O'Connell	W	6-2 6-2	Stats
Chengdu Open - Chengdu - 15-09-2025
R1 Mackenzie McdonaldM. Mcdonald	L	6-4 3-6 6-3	Stats
Davis Cup, World Group, Q2, NED-ARG 1-3 - 08-09-2025
Rubber 2 Francisco CerundoloF. Cerundolo	L	7-6(4) 6-1	Stats
U.S. Open - New York - 25-08-2025
R1 Holger RuneH. Rune	L	6-3 7-6(4) 7-6(2)	Stats

View All

T. Atmane vs B. V. D. Zandschulp Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

T. Atmane	Stats	B. V. D. Zandschulp
61.18% (238/151)	YTD Win/Loss	61.17% (378/240)
58.95% (540/376)	Sets Win/Loss	58.06% (864/624)
52.74% (4728/4236)	Games Win/Loss	53.03% (7473/6618)
65.38% (187/99)	Hard Win/Loss	58.27% (74/53)
55.07% (38/31)	Clay Win/Loss	61.59% (178/111)
40.91% (9/13)	Indoor Hard W/L	65.14% (114/61)
33.33% (4/8)	Grass Win/Loss	44.44% (12/15)
0.52	Aces Per Game	0.44
2258	Aces Total	3039
0.3	Double Faults Per Game	0.33
1317	Total Double Faults	2260
1:40:44	Average Match Time	1:36:41
375.66	Average Opponent Rank	391.79
59% (16425/27615)	1st Serve %	62% (25341/41153)
72% (11846/16425)	1st Serve Win %	72% (18139/25341)
52% (5829/11190)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (7602/15815)
43% (1008/2371)	Break Points Won % (Total)	43% (1866/4337)
38% (10272/27093)	Return Points Win %	41% (17267/42509)
40.00% (6/9)	Slam W/L	58.93% (33/23)
61.29% (19/12)	Masters W/L	49.06% (26/27)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	60.00% (12/8)
45.45% (15/18)	Main Tour W/L	51.70% (76/71)
62.16% (92/56)	Challenger W/L	63.33% (76/44)
65.43% (106/56)	Futures W/L	69.82% (155/67)
62% (234/380)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	62% (350/562)
0% (0/3)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	49% (21/43)
59% (91/155)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	53% (105/197)
53% (74/139)	Deciding Set Win %	57% (116/203)
86% (243/209)	1st Set Won, Won Match	89% (355/316)
14% (243/34)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	11% (355/38)
20% (145/29)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	23% (261/61)