Prediction of Tennys Sandgren vs Eric Quigley Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Sandgren vs E. Quigley

Tennys Sandgren
USA
w
l
w
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
4
Win
4
Played
0
Win
34
Age
36
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
6'1" (185 cm)
740
C. Rank
Ret.
41
Best Rank
297
1
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$2.3M
Career Money
$9.4K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Eric Quigley
USA
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
4
Win
4
Played
0
Win
34
Age
36
6'2" (188 cm)
Height
6'1" (185 cm)
740
C. Rank
Ret.
41
Best Rank
297
1
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$2.3M
Career Money
$9.4K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Sandgren 4 - 0 Quigley
They have played 8 sets in total, with Tennys Sandgren winning 8 and Eric Quigley winning 0. The last match between Tennys Sandgren and Eric Quigley was at the Columbus Challenger, 24-11-2016, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Tennys Sandgren getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sandgren | 4 |
| Quigley | 0 |
Last 4 H2H Matches:
(R2) Columbus Challenger(11-24-16)
Tennys Sandgren
6
6
Eric Quigley
2
4
(QF) USA F17(06-10-16)
Tennys Sandgren
6
6
Eric Quigley
4
2
(R1) Canada F1(03-02-15)
Tennys Sandgren
7
6
Eric Quigley
6
2
T. Sandgren vs E. Quigley H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $2,256,263 | Career Prize Money | $9,365 |
| 56.43% (421-325) | Career Total W/L | 53.53% (197-171) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 3 | Indoor | 0 |
| 16 | Titles | 1 |
| 4 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Sandgren vs E. Quigley Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tennys Sandgren has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Eric Quigley has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tennys Sandgren, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Eric Quigley has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tennys Sandgren has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Eric Quigley has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tennys Sandgren has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Eric Quigley winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tennys Sandgren has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 241/175), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 11/10). Eric Quigley has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 120/96), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/4).
- Player level: In the last year, Tennys Sandgren has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Eric Quigley has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Tennys Sandgren winning 4 times and Eric Quigley being victorious 0 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Tennys Sandgren winning 8 and Eric Quigley winning 0.
- The last match between Tennys Sandgren and Eric Quigley was at the Columbus Challenger, 24-11-2016, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Tennys Sandgren getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:36:22.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tennys Sandgren has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Eric Quigley has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tennys Sandgren has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Eric Quigley has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tennys Sandgren has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Eric Quigley has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Tennys Sandgren vs Eric Quigley Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Sandgren vs E. Quigley H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 4 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 8 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 49 | Games Won | 28 |
| 15 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 0:36:22 | Average Match Time | 0:36:22 |
| 73% (65/89) | 1st Serve % | 55% (69/126) |
| 83% (54/65) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (40/69) |
| 83% (20/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (28/57) |
| 32% (6/19) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/3) |
| 46% (58/126) | Return Points Win % | 17% (15/89) |
| 100% (4/4) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/4) |
| 100% (4/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/4) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Sandgren 0%, Quigley 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Sandgren 0%, Quigley 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Sandgren 0%, Quigley 0%.
T. Sandgren Recent Matches Played
E. Quigley Recent Matches Played

T. Sandgren vs E. Quigley Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.43% (421/325) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.53% (197/171) |
| 55.82% (993/786) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.51% (457/397) |
| 52.11% (8948/8222) | Games Win/Loss | 51.37% (4199/3975) |
| 57.93% (241/175) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.56% (120/96) |
| 52.84% (93/83) | Clay Win/Loss | 49.02% (25/26) |
| 57.14% (76/57) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.13% (51/45) |
| 52.38% (11/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 0.48 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 |
| 4008 | Aces Total | 1080 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1355 | Total Double Faults | 673 |
| 1:18:11 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 532.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 658.65 |
| 61% (25668/42295) | 1st Serve % | 56% (7708/13786) |
| 73% (18700/25668) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (5646/7708) |
| 50% (8246/16625) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3010/6082) |
| 38% (1428/3756) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (529/1305) |
| 37% (15591/42108) | Return Points Win % | 39% (5232/13494) |
| 43.86% (25/32) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 36.36% (12/21) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 40.86% (38/55) | Main Tour W/L | 40.00% (8/12) |
| 55.87% (195/154) | Challenger W/L | 49.24% (65/67) |
| 70.89% (151/62) | Futures W/L | 57.67% (124/91) |
| 57% (402/706) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (194/364) |
| 46% (17/37) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 52% (161/309) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (58/113) |
| 47% (110/236) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (55/120) |
| 83% (434/360) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (208/168) |
| 17% (434/74) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (208/40) |
| 20% (312/62) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (160/29) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
01:00 AM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.87
W2
1.81
12:00 AM 12/11/25
PredictionW1
1.44
W2
2.55
07:15 PM 11/11/25
PredictionW1
2.05
W2
1.67
07:40 PM 11/11/25
PredictionW1
4.6
W2
1.149
10:30 PM 11/11/25
PredictionW1
2.12
W2
1.76
09:15 PM 11/11/25
PredictionW1
1.4
W2
2.68
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
11 Nov 2025
Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Lorenzo Musetti vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 11, 2025
11 Nov 2025
Daniel Dutra Da Silva vs Emilio Nava Prediction – ATP Montevideo Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Viktor Durasovic vs Shintaro Mochizuki Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Taylor Fritz Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
11 Nov 2025
Jan-Lennard Struff vs Beibit Zhukayev Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 11th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
H2H 5-5
22:30
H2H 5-4
H2H 7-1
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal