Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tena Lukas vs Katharina Hobgarski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lukas vs Hobgarski analysis and find out who is favored!
Tena Lukas vs Katharina Hobgarski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lukas has won 41.97% of points on his second serve, while Hobgarski has won 45.54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lukas, in recent form, has won 60.14% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hobgarski has won 60.49%. The same stats for first serve returns are 43.49% and 44.67% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lukas has saved 47.17% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hobgarski has saved 53.52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lukas has won 60% of matches played (W/L 45/ 30), with Hobgarski winning 60% (W/L 30/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lukas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 385/ 237), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Hobgarski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 249/ 124), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Lukas has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.81% of matches (W/L 45/ 29), where as Hobgarski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 63.41% of matches (W/L 26/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Lukas winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Lukas winning 3 and Hobgarski winning 2. The last match between Lukas and Hobgarski was at the W25 Antalya, 17-02-2022, Second, Clay with Katharina Hobgarski getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:52:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lukas and Hobgarski have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lukas winning 0 times and Hobgarski 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Lukas winning 0, and Hobgarski 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lukas has played against opponents with an average rank of 253.17 while Hobgarski has played against players with an average rank of 313.38.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lukas has won 61% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hobgarski has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lukas has converted 54.42% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hobgarski has converted 57.73% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lukas 1 - 1 Hobgarski
208
Rank
200
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
350
Rank
189
High
26
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
58% (423-307)
Career Total W/L
64% (308-176)
64% (16-9)
YTD W/L
67% (10-5)
$31,490
Career Prize Money
$39,739
1
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tena Lukas | Katharina Hobgarski |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 27 | 23 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 10 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:0 | 1:52:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (92/149) | 71% (114/161) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 59% (54/92) | 52% (59/114) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 49% (28/57) | 46% (21/46) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (12/19) | 56% (9/16) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (80/160) | 45% (67/149) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-2 7-6(8) |
Stats 
Katharina Hobgarski
Player
Tena Lukas
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
102)
2
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
7
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
6 of
6)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
101
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Katharina Hobgarski
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve %
79%
(
52 of
66)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
37 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tena Lukas | Katharina Hobgarski |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (16/9) | 67% (10/5) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 62% (37/23) | 67% (22/11) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (282/247) | 56% (167/130) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (16/8) | 69% (9/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0.04 |
| Aces Total | 44 | 6 |
| DFs per game | 0.62 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 160 | 42 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:37 | 1:44:8 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 231.8 | 256.53 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1018/1738) | 71% (659/927) |
| 1st Serve W% | 59% (602/1018) | 58% (384/659) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 42% (301/720) | 48% (128/268) |
| BPs Won% Total | 57% (138/244) | 61% (76/125) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (857/1698) | 51% (509/1007) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (16/8) | 75% (6/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (16/25) | 67% (10/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (16/13) | 100% (10/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (16/3) | 0% (10/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 0% (5/0) |
Tena Lukas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jana Fett
Player
Tena Lukas
75%
(
51 of
68)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
50%
(
34 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Conny Perrin
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
2
Aces
1
11
Double Faults
4
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Ivonne Cavalle-Reimers
40%
(
31 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
75)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
55%
(
17 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
46%
(
21 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
51%
(
39 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
42 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Tena Lukas
76%
(
61 of
80)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
2
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
12
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
36 of
51)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
7 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
32 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Anouk Koevermans
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
6
45%
(
14 of
31)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
52%
(
26 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Katherine Sebov
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
1
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Mia Ristic
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
48 of
74)
9
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rebecca Peterson
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(1) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Tara Wurth
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
46 of
78)
1
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
60%
(
9 of
15)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
46 of
78)
90
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Tena Lukas
68%
(
49 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-0 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Katharina Hobgarski Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Katharina Hobgarski
Player
Isabella Shinikova
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Katharina Hobgarski
Player
Sofia Rocchetti
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
57 of
78)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
78)
83
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Katharina Hobgarski
Player
Cristina Dinu
80%
(
41 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katharina Hobgarski
Player
Kaylah Mcphee
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
72%
(
55 of
76)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
46%
(
33 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Katharina Hobgarski
Player
Tiphanie Lemaitre
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
53%
(
26 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
24 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katharina Hobgarski
Player
Ekaterina Yashina
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
68%
(
39 of
57)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Polina Leykina
Player
Katharina Hobgarski
75%
(
89 of
119)
1st Serve %
76%
(
74 of
97)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
48%
(
57 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
52 of
97)
114
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Katharina Hobgarski
Player
Iulia Andreea Ionescu
73%
(
47 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sofia Milatova
Player
Katharina Hobgarski
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
73%
(
36 of
49)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lukas Vs Hobgarski Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
