Tatiana Prozorova vs Saki Imamura Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 06 Aug at 04:05 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Prozorova vs S. Imamura

RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Prozorova 1 - 0 Imamura
They have played 3 sets in total, with Tatiana Prozorova winning 2 and Saki Imamura winning 1. The last match between Tatiana Prozorova and Saki Imamura was at the W100 Landisville, 06-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Tatiana Prozorova getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Prozorova | 1 |
| Imamura | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W100 Landisville(08-06-25)
T. Prozorova vs S. Imamura H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $167,295 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 63.67% (156-89) | Career Total W/L | 59.11% (172-119) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 7 | Titles | 4 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Prozorova vs S. Imamura Match Preview:
- How do Prozorova and Imamura compare in their second serve performance recently? Prozorova edges slightly with 38.88% of points won on their second serve, compared to Imamura's 38.14%.
- Prozorova shows a small advantage in returning game stats, winning 50% of opponent's second serve points, while Imamura has a close 49.79%.
- On first serve returns, Prozorova again leads with 34.4%, over Imamura's 31.68%.
- Who performs better under pressure? Imamura saves 51.68% of breakpoints, outperforming Prozorova who saves 47.69%.
- Looking at overall performance, Prozorova has a higher win rate in the last year at 70.49%, compared to Imamura's 58.06%.
- Which surfaces favor each player? Prozorova's best surface is Hard with a 71% win rate, whereas Imamura excels on Grass winning 60%.
- Prozorova competes primarily in Challengers/ITF events with a 74% win rate, compared to Imamura's 54.39% in similar events.
- In terms of opponent quality, Prozorova has faced stronger competition, playing against those with an average rank of 265.28, while Imamura’s opponents average a 423.87 ranking.
- If this match reaches a deciding set, Imamura holds an advantage, winning 58% of these scenarios compared to Prozorova's 42%.
- Prozorova has superior breakpoint conversion, capitalizing on 38.29% of opportunities, whereas Imamura converts 33.33% of the time.
Editorial Prediction (August 6, 2025, UTC):
Both players exhibit strengths and weaknesses, but Prozorova has a slight edge in recent form, particularly in second serve points and first serve return statistics. These factors are significant indicators in predicting match outcomes.
While Imamura demonstrates greater ability in saving breakpoints and deciding set performance, Prozorova's consistency across various surfaces and stronger match win rate over the past year give them an advantage.
Given the overall comparative analysis of serve efficiency, return capability, and recent form, Prozorova is the most likely winner for this upcoming tennis match.
Tatiana Prozorova vs Saki Imamura Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Prozorova vs S. Imamura H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 11 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:51:23 | Average Match Time | 1:51:23 |
| 59% (54/91) | 1st Serve % | 62% (38/61) |
| 69% (37/54) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (23/38) |
| 46% (17/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (9/23) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (3/15) |
| 48% (29/61) | Return Points Win % | 41% (37/91) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Prozorova Recent Matches Played
S. Imamura Recent Matches Played

T. Prozorova vs S. Imamura Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.67% (156/89) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.11% (172/119) |
| 62.32% (344/208) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.15% (378/272) |
| 54.83% (2761/2275) | Games Win/Loss | 54.10% (3190/2706) |
| 67.97% (87/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.09% (140/93) |
| 59.26% (48/33) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.00% (12/8) |
| 58.33% (21/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 51.52% (17/16) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 325 | Aces Total | 304 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 878 | Total Double Faults | 776 |
| 1:41:1 | Average Match Time | 1:26:19 |
| 382.33 | Average Opponent Rank | 436.46 |
| 60% (9583/15851) | 1st Serve % | 66% (10153/15360) |
| 62% (5915/9583) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (6300/10153) |
| 46% (2909/6268) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2396/5207) |
| 49% (1043/2133) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (965/1994) |
| 48% (7469/15560) | Return Points Win % | 46% (7186/15488) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.00% (14/11) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 64.57% (113/62) | Challenger W/L | 53.26% (98/86) |
| 69.44% (25/11) | Futures W/L | 69.81% (74/32) |
| 63% (154/243) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (170/288) |
| 49% (23/47) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (22/53) |
| 47% (30/64) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (35/71) |
| 86% (162/139) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (171/151) |
| 14% (162/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (171/19) |
| 20% (83/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (120/20) |