Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Taro Daniel vs Yuta Shimizu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Daniel vs Shimizu analysis and find out who is favored!
Taro Daniel vs Yuta Shimizu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Daniel has won 52.08% of points on his second serve, while Shimizu has won 50.64%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Daniel, in recent form, has won 50.71% of his opponent's second serve points, while Shimizu has won 50.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.94% and 31.34% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Daniel has saved 60.62% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Shimizu has saved 64.32% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Daniel has won 55.07% of matches played (W/L 38/ 31), with Shimizu winning 50% (W/L 23/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Daniel has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 300/ 193), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12). Shimizu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 72% (W/L 26/ 10), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 19/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Daniel has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 48.15% of matches (W/L 13/ 14), where as Shimizu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.38% of matches (W/L 22/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Daniel winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Daniel winning 4 and Shimizu winning 0. The last match between Daniel and Shimizu was at the Playford Challenger, 27-10-2023, Quarterfinals, Hard with Taro Daniel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:30:26.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Daniel and Shimizu have played a deciding set 0 times, with Daniel winning 0 times and Shimizu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Daniel winning 2, and Shimizu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Daniel has played against opponents with an average rank of 255.87 while Shimizu has played against players with an average rank of 279.35.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Daniel has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Shimizu has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Daniel has converted 46.12% of breakpoint opportunities, and Shimizu has converted 43.75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Daniel 2 - 0 Shimizu
85
Rank
58
High
31
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
274
Rank
203
High
24
Age
L
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
58% (546-388)
Career Total W/L
65% (226-122)
45% (9-11)
YTD W/L
57% (8-6)
$2,142,314
Career Prize Money
$60,235
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Taro Daniel | Yuta Shimizu |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 26 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:26 | 1:30:26 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (84/129) | 63% (85/136) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (62/84) | 60% (51/85) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (25/45) | 43% (22/51) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (8/16) | 40% (4/10) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (63/136) | 33% (42/129) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Taro Daniel
Player
Yuta Shimizu
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
32
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 7-6(5) |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Yuta Shimizu
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Taro Daniel | Yuta Shimizu |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 45% (9/11) | 57% (8/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (20/26) | 60% (18/12) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (204/229) | 52% (162/147) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) | 57% (4/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 57% (4/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.39 | 0.3 |
| Aces Total | 81 | 46 |
| DFs per game | 0.18 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 38 | 39 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:16 | 1:31:27 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 175.85 | 333.64 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (821/1365) | 60% (601/1000) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (567/821) | 70% (422/601) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (273/544) | 54% (215/399) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (40/90) | 43% (36/84) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (459/1319) | 38% (371/967) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 53% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 62% (8/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (8/18) | 57% (8/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 29% (2/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 89% (9/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 11% (9/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 10% (10/1) | 0% (5/0) |
Taro Daniel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Taro Daniel
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
80%
(
35 of
44)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Christopher O'Connell
85%
(
45 of
53)
1st Serve %
74%
(
46 of
62)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
88%
(
7 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giulio Zeppieri
Player
Taro Daniel
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
56%
(
57 of
102)
9
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
46 of
57)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
28 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
102)
98
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(1) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jack Draper
Player
Taro Daniel
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
97%
(
28 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Taro Daniel
54%
(
22 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex De Minaur
Player
Taro Daniel
37%
(
18 of
49)
1st Serve %
40%
(
19 of
48)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
78%
(
14 of
18)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marcos Giron
Player
Taro Daniel
49%
(
30 of
61)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Taro Daniel
45%
(
43 of
95)
1st Serve %
58%
(
51 of
88)
7
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
56%
(
29 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
35 of
88)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
1-6 6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Taro Daniel
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Yuta Shimizu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Yuta Shimizu
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Mattia Bellucci
78%
(
73 of
93)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Ergi Kirkin
56%
(
40 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
9 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Yuta Shimizu
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
11
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Yuta Shimizu
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
48 of
96)
10
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
6
86%
(
43 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
20 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
33 of
96)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Mikalai Haliak
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
29 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Yuta Shimizu
57%
(
50 of
87)
1st Serve %
53%
(
47 of
89)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
70%
(
26 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Enrico Dalla Valle
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
2
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
1
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
43 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
2
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Daniel Vs Shimizu Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
