Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Tamira Paszek vs Lauren Albanese Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paszek vs Albanese analysis and find out who is favored!
Tamira Paszek vs Lauren Albanese Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paszek has won 43.81% of points on his second serve, while Albanese has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paszek, in recent form, has won 58.6% of his opponent's second serve points, while Albanese has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.02% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paszek has saved 55.29% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Albanese has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paszek has won 62.3% of matches played (W/L 38/ 23), with Albanese winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paszek has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 56/ 32), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 49/ 47). Albanese has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 158/ 132), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Paszek has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 30/ 20), where as Albanese has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paszek winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Paszek winning 2 and Albanese winning 0. The last match between Paszek and Albanese was at the Citi Open - Washington, 19-07-2016, First, Hard with Tamira Paszek getting the victory 1100038054.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:37:26.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paszek and Albanese have played a deciding set 0 times, with Paszek winning 0 times and Albanese 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Paszek winning 0, and Albanese 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paszek has played against opponents with an average rank of 318.16 while Albanese has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paszek has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Albanese has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paszek has converted 51.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Albanese has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Paszek 1 - 0 Albanese
336
Rank
26
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
158
High
34
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
57% (386-296)
Career Total W/L
52% (257-237)
67% (12-6)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,345,638
Career Prize Money
$55,600
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Tamira Paszek | Lauren Albanese |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:26 | 1:37:26 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (37/64) | 33% (19/57) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (23/37) | 63% (12/19) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (15/27) | 37% (14/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 50% (3/6) |
| Return Points W% | 54% (31/57) | 41% (26/64) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Tamira Paszek
Player
Lauren Albanese
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
33%
(
19 of
57)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Tamira Paszek | Lauren Albanese |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (12/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 68% (26/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (200/154) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.1 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 17 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.21 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 37 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:25:47 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 309.67 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (682/963) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (415/682) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (129/281) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (68/134) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (476/992) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (12/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (13/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (13/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tamira Paszek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Maria Mateas
Player
Tamira Paszek
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tayisiya Morderger
Player
Tamira Paszek
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Johanna Silva
Player
Tamira Paszek
73%
(
79 of
108)
1st Serve %
81%
(
81 of
100)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
44 of
81)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
48%
(
52 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
103
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Aminata Sall
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
89%
(
8 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
46%
(
22 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Radka Zelnickova
Player
Tamira Paszek
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
76%
(
53 of
70)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
44%
(
32 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
80
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Lara Schmidt
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve %
81%
(
39 of
48)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamira Paszek
Player
Marine Szostak
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Lauren Albanese Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ulrikke Eikeri
Player
Lauren Albanese
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
64
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yukina Saigo
Player
Lauren Albanese
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naiktha Bains
Player
Lauren Albanese
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
45 of
64)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
28%
(
7 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
51%
(
32 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Olivia Rogowska
Player
Lauren Albanese
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
4
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lauren Albanese
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
72%
(
56 of
78)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
78)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lauren Albanese
Player
Mai Minokoshi
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lauren Albanese
Player
Ramu Ueda
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fangzhou Liu
Player
Lauren Albanese
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
71%
(
32 of
45)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lauren Albanese
Player
Shilin Xu
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
73%
(
22 of
30)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
9 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
36
Total Points Won
26
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Haruka Kaji
Player
Lauren Albanese
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
75%
(
48 of
64)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Paszek Vs Albanese Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
