Tamara Zidansek vs Amandine Hesse Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing recent performance in second serve points, Hesse has secured a 41.25% success rate, marginally trailing Zidansek, who has achieved 41.51%. This particular statistic often correlates highly with the accuracy of match predictions.

Examining their return game performances, Hesse has won 50.49% of their opponent's second serve points, while Zidansek surpasses slightly with 52.33%. When faced with first serves, Hesse claims 31.07%, in contrast to Zidansek’s more impressive 35.95%, both of which can strongly indicate who holds an advantage in head-to-head matchups.

Under pressure, particularly in breakpoints, Hesse has saved 47.25% compared to Zidansek's 37.61%. This is an insightful metric for predicting potential outcomes in high-stakes game scenarios. Reviewing performance over the past year, Hesse boasts a 50.72% win rate from a 35:34 win/loss record, while Zidansek holds a slightly better 53.7% from a 29:25 record.

When considering surface preferences, Hesse's strongest career wins are on Hard courts, achieving 58%, while her least favorable surface is Grass at 27%. Conversely, Zidansek excels on Clay with a remarkable 72% win rate, though struggles more on Grass, winning only 40% of matches.

Focusing on competition levels, during the past year, Hesse participated mostly in Challengers/ITF tournaments with over $10K rewards, achieving a 52.31% win rate. Similarly, Zidansek also played primarily in these arenas, securing a 50% win rate. These relative performances offer insights into predictions, conditioned by the competitive levels involved.

In direct head-to-head confrontations, Zidansek has emerged victorious once in their single previous meeting, played over two sets, underscoring a decisive 6-2, 6-3 win at the W 40 Macon Quarterfinals held on Indoor hard courts. The players have been on the court together for an average of 1:17:0, providing an estimate for match duration expectations. Interestingly, neither player has engaged in deciding sets or tiebreaks against each other, possibly influencing predictions if the current match extends under such conditions.

Assessing opponent quality, Hesse faced competitors with an average ranking of 354.93, compared to Zidansek, who competed against higher-ranked opponents averaging a rank of 199.76. This further amplifies Zidansek's competitive edge. In deciding sets among all competitors, Hesse has won 42% of these matches over the last 12 months, whereas Zidansek holds a more formidable 59% success rate.

Regarding breakpoint conversion in the current form, Hesse capitalized on 37.24% of opportunities, slightly edged out by Zidansek who converted 39.59%. These can be crucial indicators for in-match betting when player momentum shifts at breakpoint moments. With the metrics placing Zidansek generally ahead in key statistics, particularly in competitive scope and pressure situations, the odds lean in favor of Zidansek securing victory in the upcoming match.