Prediction of Tamaka Takagi vs Nathalie Herreman Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
T. Takagi vs N. Herreman

Tamaka Takagi

JPN

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

113

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Nathalie Herreman

FRA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

113

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Takagi 1 - 0 Herreman

They have played 3 sets in total, with Tamaka Takagi winning 2 and Nathalie Herreman winning 1. The last match between Tamaka Takagi and Nathalie Herreman was at the Brisbane, 31-12-1990, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Tamaka Takagi getting the victory 4-6 7-5 6-4.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Takagi	1
Herreman	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) Brisbane(12-31-90)

Stats

Tamaka Takagi

Nathalie Herreman

T. Takagi vs N. Herreman H2H Profile

T. Takagi	Stats	N. Herreman
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
53.93% (103-88)	Career Total W/L	51.41% (256-242)
1	Hard	0
1	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

T. Takagi vs N. Herreman Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tamaka Takagi has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nathalie Herreman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tamaka Takagi, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nathalie Herreman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Tamaka Takagi has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nathalie Herreman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Tamaka Takagi has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Nathalie Herreman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Tamaka Takagi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 65/49), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 41% (W/L 12/17). Nathalie Herreman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 82/73), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 13/15).
Player level: In the last year, Tamaka Takagi has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Nathalie Herreman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tamaka Takagi winning 1 times and Nathalie Herreman being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Tamaka Takagi winning 2 and Nathalie Herreman winning 1.
The last match between Tamaka Takagi and Nathalie Herreman was at the Brisbane, 31-12-1990, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Tamaka Takagi getting the victory 4-6 7-5 6-4.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tamaka Takagi has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Nathalie Herreman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tamaka Takagi has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nathalie Herreman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Tamaka Takagi has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nathalie Herreman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Tamaka Takagi vs Nathalie Herreman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

T. Takagi vs N. Herreman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

T. Takagi	Stats	N. Herreman
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
17	Games Won	15
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

T. Takagi Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Osaka - 09-02-1993
Q1 Anori FukudaA. Fukuda	W	6-0 6-0	Stats
Q3 Fang LiF. Li	W	6-3 6-4	Stats
Q2 Svetlana KomlevaS. Komleva	W	6-2 6-4	Stats
R3 Naoko SawamatsuN. Sawamatsu	L	6-1 7-5	Stats
Tokyo Pan Pacific - 02-02-1993
Q1 Akiko KijimutaA. Kijimuta	W	7-5 6-3	Stats

View All

N. Herreman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
ITF Cergy Pontois - 04-12-1995
Q1 Ines HeiseI. Heise	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
ITF Sao Paulo 1 - 06-11-1995
R3 Unknown PlayerU. Player	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
ITF Lakeland - 23-10-1995
Q1 Stephanie HalsellS. Halsell	L	7-6(5) 3-6 6-4	Stats
ITF Fort Lauderdale - 16-10-1995
R4 Daphne Van De ZandeD. Van	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
R3 Lihini WeerasuriyaL. Weerasuriya	W	4-6 6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

T. Takagi vs N. Herreman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

T. Takagi	Stats	N. Herreman
53.93% (103/88)	YTD Win/Loss	51.41% (256/242)
53.15% (236/208)	Sets Win/Loss	51.67% (587/549)
52.09% (2094/1926)	Games Win/Loss	50.22% (5194/5149)
57.02% (65/49)	Hard Win/Loss	52.90% (82/73)
41.38% (12/17)	Clay Win/Loss	50.00% (70/70)
60.87% (14/9)	Indoor Hard W/L	56.67% (51/39)
50.00% (4/4)	Grass Win/Loss	46.43% (13/15)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
478.64	Average Opponent Rank	346.88
0.00% (0/4)	Slam W/L	38.89% (7/11)
57.89% (55/40)	Challenger W/L	56.25% (27/21)
47.06% (8/9)	Futures W/L	46.99% (39/44)
55% (102/187)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	52% (256/495)
52% (12/23)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	53% (16/30)
54% (37/68)	Deciding Set Win %	48% (68/143)
84% (102/86)	1st Set Won, Won Match	84% (266/223)
15% (102/15)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	15% (266/41)
20% (87/17)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	14% (232/33)