Tallon Griekspoor vs Jesper De Jong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 18 Jul at 10:32 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Griekspoor vs J. De Jong

NED
0
Win
Played
2
Win

NED
0
Win
Played
2
Win
Head-to-head: Griekspoor 0 - 2 Jong
They have played 5 sets in total, with Tallon Griekspoor winning 1 and Jesper De Jong winning 4. The last match between Jesper De Jong and Tallon Griekspoor was at the Nordea Open - Bastad, 18-07-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 4-6 7-6(3) 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Griekspoor | 0 |
Jong | 2 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(QF) Nordea Open - Bastad(07-18-25)
(QF) Open Occitanie - Montpellier(01-31-25)
T. Griekspoor vs J. D. Jong H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$4,249,855 | Career Prize Money | $1,067,380 |
61.95% (425-261) | Career Total W/L | 61.99% (287-176) |
0 | Clay | 1 |
0 | Indoor | 1 |
21 | Titles | 7 |
0 | Total H2H Matches | 2 |
56.00% (28-22) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.84% (17-14) |
1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
T. Griekspoor vs J. D. Jong Match Preview:
- In recent months, Griekspoor's second serve performance has been slightly stronger than Jong's, with a win rate of 50.04% compared to 46.55% for Jong. How important is this in predicting the winner? Very significant, as it often correlates with match outcomes.
- When it comes to returning opponents' second serves, Griekspoor again holds a slight edge with 43.63%, slightly above Jong's 42.77%. However, Jong outperforms Griekspoor on first serve returns with a 24.14% win rate, while Griekspoor is at 22.61%.
- Griekspoor seems more resilient under pressure, saving 59.57% of breakpoints compared to Jong's 56.71%.
- Over the past year, Griekspoor has a higher match win percentage of 59.7% compared to 57.97% for Jong, suggesting a slight advantage in overall performance.
- Surface preference shows Griekspoor excels on grass with a 67% win rate, while Jong's best results are on hard courts at 67%. Jong's weakness on grass (33% win rate) could be pivotal depending on the match surface.
- Griekspoor has predominantly competed higher up on the Main tour recently, winning 70% of matches, while Jong competed largely in Challengers/ITF tournaments with a 62.86% win rate. This may indicate Griekspoor's experience at higher competition levels.
- When looking at direct encounters, Jong has the upper hand, having won their only previous match decisively, along with excelling in a tiebreak against Griekspoor.
- Griekspoor's opponents have been generally more highly ranked, averaging around 77.1, while Jong's have been around 179.81, which might reflect stronger competition faced by Griekspoor.
- Griekspoor outperforms Jong in deciding sets overall, with a win rate of 58% compared to Jong's 50%, a critical factor if the match extends to a deciding set.
- Jong shows better breakpoint conversion with 29.1% compared to Griekspoor's 25.13%, a notable advantage in crucial break opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (July 18, 2025, UTC):
As Griekspoor and Jong prepare to meet again, several factors could determine the outcome of their upcoming match. Griekspoor shows slight superiority in second serve statistics, a crucial aspect when assessing potential match outcomes. Additionally, Griekspoor's performance under pressure, evidenced by his higher breakpoint save rate, could be advantageous during critical moments.
However, Jong’s historical success in their head-to-head matchup offers him a psychological edge. His better first serve return statistics might grant him more opportunities to break Griekspoor’s serve.
Griekspoor’s experience against more competitive opponents and his ability to perform well in deciding sets could tilt the scales in tight situations. Nonetheless, Jong’s superior breakpoint conversion rate suggests he could capitalize on these opportunities more efficiently.
Taking all these factors into account, Griekspoor appears to have a slight overall advantage given his recent form, higher competition level, and resilience under pressure. However, with Jong's ability to disrupt Griekspoor's serve and his past victory in their match, this will likely be a close contest.
Given the analysis, Griekspoor is most likely to secure the win in this upcoming tennis match.
Tallon Griekspoor vs Jesper De Jong Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Griekspoor vs J. D. Jong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
0 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
1 | Sets Won | 4 |
25 | Games Won | 30 |
21 | Aces (Total) | 21 |
4 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
2:13:32 | Average Match Time | 2:13:32 |
62% (110/177) | 1st Serve % | 60% (107/178) |
73% (80/110) | 1st Serve Win % | 79% (84/107) |
52% (35/67) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (38/71) |
19% (3/16) | Break Pts Won % | 45% (5/11) |
31% (56/178) | Return Points Win % | 35% (62/177) |
0% (0/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (2/2) |
0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Griekspoor Recent Matches Played
J. D. Jong Recent Matches Played

T. Griekspoor vs J. D. Jong Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
61.95% (425/261) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.99% (287/176) |
58.55% (976/691) | Sets Win/Loss | 59.66% (639/432) |
52.54% (8550/7722) | Games Win/Loss | 54.21% (5534/4674) |
63.68% (149/85) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.67% (94/47) |
63.51% (181/104) | Clay Win/Loss | 64.45% (165/91) |
53.91% (69/59) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.83% (22/26) |
66.67% (26/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (6/12) |
0.46 | Aces Per Game | 0.4 |
3657 | Aces Total | 1994 |
0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
1760 | Total Double Faults | 1215 |
1:30:53 | Average Match Time | 1:41:3 |
404.93 | Average Opponent Rank | 379.1 |
64% (28775/45308) | 1st Serve % | 60% (18958/31605) |
72% (20839/28775) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (13350/18958) |
51% (8495/16548) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (6445/12647) |
40% (1620/4037) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1416/3357) |
37% (16841/45209) | Return Points Win % | 41% (13122/31965) |
50.00% (28/28) | Slam W/L | 60.98% (25/16) |
44.00% (22/28) | Masters W/L | 54.55% (6/5) |
50.00% (11/11) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
57.82% (85/62) | Main Tour W/L | 48.94% (23/24) |
67.05% (118/58) | Challenger W/L | 60.48% (127/83) |
68.67% (160/73) | Futures W/L | 69.08% (105/47) |
63% (397/633) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (273/439) |
49% (19/39) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (6/12) |
56% (169/300) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (85/165) |
56% (143/254) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (73/138) |
84% (415/348) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (281/247) |
16% (415/66) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (281/34) |
28% (271/77) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (182/38) |