search

Takanyi Garanganga vs Colin Van Beem Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Garanganga vs Beem analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Takanyi Garanganga vs Colin Van Beem Important H2H Prediction Stats:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Garanganga has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Beem has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Garanganga, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Beem has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Garanganga has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Beem has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Garanganga has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Beem winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Garanganga has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 260/ 171), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 34/ 49). Beem has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 49/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Garanganga winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Garanganga winning 2 and Beem winning 0. The last match between Garanganga and Beem was at the Turkey F51, 25-12-2016, Quarterfinals, Hard with Takanyi Garanganga getting the victory .
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Garanganga and Beem have played a deciding set 0 times, with Garanganga winning 0 times and Beem 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Garanganga winning 0, and Beem 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Garanganga has played against opponents with an average rank of while Beem has played against players with an average rank of .
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Garanganga has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Beem has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Garanganga has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Beem has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365

Head-to-head: Garanganga 1 - 0 Beem

Takanyi Garanganga

9

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

9

Minor

Ret.

Rank

288

High

33

Age

R

Plays

1

Total

0

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

Ret.

Rank

537

High

31

Age

Plays

Colin Van Beem

0

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

0

Minor

1

Total

0

1

Hard

0

0

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

W W L W W L L L L L

Form

W W L W W W W L W L

54% (353-295)

Career Total W/L

56% (191-153)

0% (0-0)

YTD W/L

0% (0-0)

$13,305

Career Prize Money

$0

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Garanganga VS Beem H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Takanyi Garanganga Colin Van Beem
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 0
Games Won 12 7
Aces (Total) 3 5
DFs (Total) 8 3
Avg Match Time 1:28:0 1:28:0
1st Serve % 61% (35/57) 58% (36/62)
1st Serve Win% 83% (29/35) 64% (23/36)
2nd Serve Win% 41% (9/22) 42% (11/26)
BPs Won% (Total) 40% (4/10) 33% (1/3)
Return Points W% 45% (28/62) 33% (19/57)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Garanganga VS Beem H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-4 6-3
cross
Takanyi Garanganga
Player
Colin Van Beem
61% ( 35 of 57)
1st Serve %
58% ( 36 of 62)
3
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
3
83% ( 29 of 35)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 23 of 36)
41% ( 9 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 11 of 26)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
33% ( 19 of 57)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 28 of 62)
66
Total Points Won
53

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Takanyi Garanganga Colin Van Beem
YTD W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Sets Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Games Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Hard Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0 0
Aces Total 0 0
DFs per game 0 0
DFs Total 0 0
Avg Match Time 1st Match 1st Match
Avg Opp Rank 0 0
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st Serve W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
2nd Serve W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
BPs Won% Total 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Return Pts W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)

Takanyi Garanganga Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
Q1
L
6-3 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Louis Tessa
Player
Takanyi Garanganga
79% ( 37 of 47)
1st Serve %
54% ( 33 of 61)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
65% ( 24 of 37)
1st Serve Won
70% ( 23 of 33)
40% ( 4 of 10)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 11 of 28)
20% ( 2 of 10)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
40% ( 19 of 47)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 27 of 61)
55
Total Points Won
53
L
3-6 3-1 ret. H2H
R1
cross
Louis Herman
Player
Takanyi Garanganga
78% ( 43 of 55)
1st Serve %
62% ( 29 of 47)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
6
67% ( 29 of 43)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 16 of 29)
50% ( 6 of 12)
2nd Serve Won
28% ( 5 of 18)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
36% ( 20 of 55)
Rtn Points Won
55% ( 26 of 47)
61
Total Points Won
41
L
6-3 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Takanyi Garanganga
66% ( 35 of 53)
1st Serve %
59% ( 37 of 63)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74% ( 26 of 35)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 22 of 37)
67% ( 12 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
46% ( 12 of 26)
36% ( 4 of 11)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
28% ( 15 of 53)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 29 of 63)
67
Total Points Won
49
L
6-4 6-2 H2H
QF
cross
Kelsey Stevenson
Player
Takanyi Garanganga
69% ( 70 of 102)
1st Serve %
56% ( 54 of 96)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
11
83% ( 58 of 70)
1st Serve Won
78% ( 42 of 54)
47% ( 15 of 32)
2nd Serve Won
52% ( 22 of 42)
50% ( 2 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 6)
28% ( 29 of 102)
Rtn Points Won
33% ( 32 of 96)
105
Total Points Won
93
L
6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 H2H
R2
cross
Takanyi Garanganga
Player
Mehluli Don Ayanda Sibanda
65% ( 33 of 51)
1st Serve %
74% ( 58 of 78)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
82% ( 27 of 33)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 29 of 58)
56% ( 10 of 18)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 9 of 20)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
67% ( 2 of 3)
27% ( 14 of 51)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 40 of 78)
77
Total Points Won
52
W
6-1 7-6(5) H2H
R1
cross
Takanyi Garanganga
Player
Jaime Sigauque
82% ( 27 of 33)
1st Serve %
62% ( 29 of 47)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
93% ( 25 of 27)
1st Serve Won
45% ( 13 of 29)
50% ( 3 of 6)
2nd Serve Won
39% ( 7 of 18)
71% ( 5 of 7)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
15% ( 5 of 33)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 27 of 47)
55
Total Points Won
25
W
6-2 6-1 H2H
F
cross
David Perez Sanz
Player
Takanyi Garanganga
53% ( 38 of 72)
1st Serve %
55% ( 33 of 60)
10
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
84% ( 32 of 38)
1st Serve Won
76% ( 25 of 33)
44% ( 15 of 34)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 9 of 27)
67% ( 4 of 6)
Break Points Won
50% ( 2 of 4)
35% ( 25 of 72)
Rtn Points Won
43% ( 26 of 60)
73
Total Points Won
59
L
7-5 6-3 H2H
SF
cross
Takanyi Garanganga
Player
Kelsey Stevenson
65% ( 31 of 48)
1st Serve %
61% ( 35 of 57)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
84% ( 26 of 31)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 22 of 35)
59% ( 10 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
55% ( 12 of 22)
100% ( 3 of 3)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
25% ( 12 of 48)
Rtn Points Won
40% ( 23 of 57)
59
Total Points Won
46
W
6-4 6-3 H2H
QF
cross
Takanyi Garanganga
Player
Dennis Uspensky
70% ( 52 of 74)
1st Serve %
75% ( 78 of 104)
4
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
6
71% ( 37 of 52)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 43 of 78)
23% ( 5 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
23% ( 6 of 26)
40% ( 8 of 20)
Break Points Won
56% ( 5 of 9)
43% ( 32 of 74)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 55 of 104)
97
Total Points Won
81
W
6-0 4-6 6-4 H2H

Colin Van Beem Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
Q2
cross
Stefan Loncar
Player
Colin Van Beem
68% ( 49 of 72)
1st Serve %
60% ( 32 of 53)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
61% ( 30 of 49)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 21 of 32)
57% ( 13 of 23)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 10 of 21)
100% ( 3 of 3)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
40% ( 29 of 72)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 22 of 53)
65
Total Points Won
60
L
6-2 3-6 10-6 H2H
Q1
cross
Colin Van Beem
Player
Goran Radanovic
57% ( 45 of 79)
1st Serve %
58% ( 47 of 81)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
62% ( 28 of 45)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 29 of 47)
44% ( 15 of 34)
2nd Serve Won
53% ( 18 of 34)
43% ( 3 of 7)
Break Points Won
80% ( 4 of 5)
46% ( 36 of 79)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 34 of 81)
77
Total Points Won
83
W
3-6 7-6(0) 10-7 H2H
R2
cross
Mircea-Alexandru Jecan
Player
Colin Van Beem
67% ( 45 of 67)
1st Serve %
56% ( 46 of 82)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
71% ( 32 of 45)
1st Serve Won
48% ( 22 of 46)
41% ( 9 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
58% ( 21 of 36)
50% ( 5 of 10)
Break Points Won
29% ( 2 of 7)
39% ( 26 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
48% ( 39 of 82)
80
Total Points Won
69
L
7-5 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Colin Van Beem
Player
Patrik Rikl
56% ( 40 of 71)
1st Serve %
63% ( 57 of 91)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80% ( 32 of 40)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 33 of 57)
58% ( 18 of 31)
2nd Serve Won
59% ( 20 of 34)
36% ( 4 of 11)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
30% ( 21 of 71)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 38 of 91)
88
Total Points Won
74
W
3-6 6-4 6-2 H2H
QF
W
6-1 6-3 H2H
Q2
W
6-1 6-2 H2H
Q1
W
6-3 6-3 H2H
R2
cross
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Colin Van Beem
61% ( 37 of 61)
1st Serve %
47% ( 27 of 57)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
78% ( 29 of 37)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 17 of 27)
46% ( 11 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 10 of 30)
45% ( 5 of 11)
Break Points Won
40% ( 2 of 5)
34% ( 21 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 30 of 57)
70
Total Points Won
48
L
7-5 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Colin Van Beem
Player
Gokberk Ergeneman
56% ( 30 of 54)
1st Serve %
68% ( 43 of 63)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
80% ( 24 of 30)
1st Serve Won
51% ( 22 of 43)
50% ( 12 of 24)
2nd Serve Won
40% ( 8 of 20)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
33% ( 18 of 54)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 33 of 63)
69
Total Points Won
48
W
6-1 6-2 H2H
QF
W
6-4 6-2 H2H

Garanganga Vs Beem Prediction H2H Images To Share

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions