Taha Baadi vs Joshua Peck Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Nov at 11:57 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Baadi vs J. Peck

CAN
2
Win
Played
0
Win

CAN
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Baadi 2 - 0 Peck
They have played 4 sets in total, with Taha Baadi winning 4 and Joshua Peck winning 0. The last match between Taha Baadi and Joshua Peck was at the Drummondville Challenger, 10-11-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: I.hard, with Taha Baadi getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Baadi | 2 |
| Peck | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Drummondville Challenger(11-10-25)
(R2) M15 Trois-Rivieres(10-30-25)
T. Baadi vs J. Peck H2H Profile
T. Baadi vs J. Peck Match Preview:
- How do Taha Baadi and Joshua Peck compare in terms of second serve performance over the last 6 months? Taha Baadi leads with 46.12% of points won, with Joshua Peck trailing at 39.53%.
- Considering return game stats, who has the advantage? Joshua Peck holds a slight edge, winning 47.39% of opponent's second serve points compared to Taha Baadi's 45.77%.
- How do the players perform against the first serve? Joshua Peck has a minor upper hand also in first serve returns, with a 30.91% success rate versus Taha Baadi's 28.94%.
- Under pressure situations, Taha Baadi has a small advantage, saving 52.99% of breakpoints, whereas Joshua Peck saves 50.00%.
- Looking at the performance overview over the past year, Taha Baadi has won 52.38% of his matches, ahead of Joshua Peck's 48.72%.
- What is the best surface for each player? Taha Baadi excels on indoor hard courts with 52% wins, while Joshua Peck performs best on clay with the same win percentage.
- In terms of player level, Taha Baadi has a slightly stronger performance in low-tier tournaments, winning 57.45% of matches compared to Joshua Peck's 48.72%.
- History-wise, Taha Baadi has a perfect head-to-head record against Joshua Peck, winning both sets of their only encounter.
- Joshua Peck, however, frequently plays against higher-ranked opponents, suggesting he might be more seasoned with a ranking challenge.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Joshua Peck holds a better record, winning 64% of deciders compared to Taha Baadi’s 50%.
Editorial Prediction (November 9, 2025, UTC):
Taha Baadi demonstrates stronger second serve performance and is more adept under pressure, key factors that often influence match outcomes. His consistent performance on indoor hard courts aligns well with the surface of their previous encounter, where he emerged victorious.
Joshua Peck, while having the edge in return games and competing more against higher-ranked opponents, shows vulnerability in head-to-head encounters with Taha Baadi, losing both sets they've contested so far.
Despite Joshua Peck's prowess in deciding sets, Taha Baadi's overall performance, favorable playing conditions, and psychological edge from their prior match tip the scale in his favor.
Based on these analyses, Taha Baadi is more likely to win the upcoming match.
Taha Baadi vs Joshua Peck Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Baadi vs J. Peck H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 24 | Games Won | 14 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:29:7 | Average Match Time | 1:29:7 |
| 68% (80/117) | 1st Serve % | 70% (93/132) |
| 69% (55/80) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (55/93) |
| 57% (21/37) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (18/39) |
| 50% (8/16) | Break Pts Won % | 18% (2/11) |
| 45% (59/132) | Return Points Win % | 35% (41/117) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Baadi Recent Matches Played
J. Peck Recent Matches Played

T. Baadi vs J. Peck Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 47.76% (96/105) | YTD Win/Loss | 45.65% (63/75) |
| 47.54% (222/245) | Sets Win/Loss | 45.51% (142/170) |
| 48.38% (2126/2268) | Games Win/Loss | 48.62% (1444/1526) |
| 49.04% (51/53) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.59% (43/42) |
| 34.48% (10/19) | Clay Win/Loss | 53.85% (14/12) |
| 52.24% (35/32) | Indoor Hard W/L | 22.22% (6/21) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.29 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 620 | Aces Total | 304 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 575 | Total Double Faults | 300 |
| 1:28:14 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 439.1 | Average Opponent Rank | 349.96 |
| 61% (7258/11861) | 1st Serve % | 60% (3019/5047) |
| 66% (4821/7258) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (2034/3019) |
| 47% (2176/4603) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (901/2028) |
| 41% (462/1135) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (160/434) |
| 39% (4648/11920) | Return Points Win % | 37% (1851/5008) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 31.91% (15/32) | Challenger W/L | 26.67% (4/11) |
| 53.69% (80/69) | Futures W/L | 47.97% (59/64) |
| 48% (95/200) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 46% (61/134) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 46% (25/54) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (19/42) |
| 52% (34/66) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (20/36) |
| 77% (105/81) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (62/53) |
| 23% (105/24) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (62/9) |
| 15% (96/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (76/10) |