Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Susanne Celik vs Zoe Kruger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Celik vs Kruger analysis and find out who is favored!
Susanne Celik vs Zoe Kruger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Celik has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Kruger has won 20.45%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Celik, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kruger has won 48.28%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Celik has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kruger has saved 23.53% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Celik has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Kruger winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Celik has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 115/ 64), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2). Kruger has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 42/ 35), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 22/ 23).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Celik winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Celik winning 2 and Kruger winning 0. The last match between Celik and Kruger was at the Lagos, 10-10-2018, Second, Hard with Susanne Celik getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:8:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Celik and Kruger have played a deciding set 0 times, with Celik winning 0 times and Kruger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Celik winning 0, and Kruger 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Celik has played against opponents with an average rank of while Kruger has played against players with an average rank of 796.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Celik has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kruger has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Celik has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kruger has converted 50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Celik 1 - 0 Kruger
Ret.
Rank
153
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
510
Rank
424
High
21
Age
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
58% (203-146)
Career Total W/L
52% (64-58)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-2)
$5,130
Career Prize Money
$1,020
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Susanne Celik | Zoe Kruger |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:8:0 | 1:8:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (39/64) | 41% (19/46) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (26/39) | 68% (13/19) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (15/25) | 41% (11/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 57% (4/7) | 11% (1/9) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (22/46) | 36% (23/64) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Susanne Celik
Player
Zoe Kruger
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
41%
(
19 of
46)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
13 of
19)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Susanne Celik | Zoe Kruger |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 23% (7/24) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.13 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 2 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.67 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 796 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 52% (47/91) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (20/47) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 20% (9/44) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/8) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (33/86) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Susanne Celik Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Nefisa Berberovic
Player
Susanne Celik
51%
(
39 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
4
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
5
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
32 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susanne Celik
Player
Victoria Mikhaylova
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
50%
(
46 of
92)
1
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
8
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
42 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
94
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nefisa Berberovic
Player
Susanne Celik
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
11 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Susanne Celik
Player
Jenny Duerst
61%
(
58 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
91)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
89%
(
8 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
44%
(
42 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
49 of
91)
102
Total Points Won
84
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Susanne Celik
Player
Nastja Kolar
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
56%
(
19 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Susanne Celik
Player
Karolayne Da Rosa
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve %
74%
(
50 of
68)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
43%
(
34 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susanne Celik
Player
Naima Karamoko
72%
(
69 of
96)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
6
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
38 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
99
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ylona-Georgiana Ghioroaie
Player
Susanne Celik
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
23 of
35)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
45
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dalma Galfi
Player
Susanne Celik
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
15 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yuki Naito
Player
Susanne Celik
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Zoe Kruger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Zoe Kruger
57%
(
17 of
30)
1st Serve %
34%
(
12 of
35)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
94%
(
16 of
17)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
2 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
51
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Manon Leonard
Player
Zoe Kruger
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
48%
(
27 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Timea Babos
Player
Zoe Kruger
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
4
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Himeno Sakatsume
Player
Zoe Kruger
68%
(
77 of
113)
1st Serve %
60%
(
66 of
110)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
52%
(
40 of
77)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
51%
(
58 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
59 of
110)
114
Total Points Won
109
|
5-7 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Talia Gibson
Player
Zoe Kruger
45%
(
31 of
69)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
104)
3
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
5
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
59)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
41%
(
28 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
51 of
104)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Arina Rodionova
Player
Zoe Kruger
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Zoe Kruger
Player
Yui Chikaraishi
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zoe Kruger
Player
Naiktha Bains
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
58%
(
61 of
105)
2
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
8
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
40 of
61)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
13 of
44)
26%
(
6 of
23)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
105)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Julia Grabher
Player
Zoe Kruger
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
69%
(
57 of
83)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
5-7 6-2 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Zoe Kruger
Player
Alena Fomina
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Celik Vs Kruger Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
