Prediction of Sumit Nagal [171st] vs Facundo Diaz Acosta [152nd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L W L W W L
Form
W L W W L W L L L LHead-To-Head: Nagal 2 - 2 Acosta
They have played 12 sets in total, with Nagal winning 6 and Acosta winning 6. The last match between Nagal and Acosta was at the Swiss Indoors Basel - Basel, 19-10-2024, Q1 round, I.hard with Sumit Nagal getting the victory 5-7 7-6(3) 7-6(5).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sumit Nagal | 2 |
| Facundo Diaz Acosta | 2 |
| Nagal | Stats | Acosta |
|---|---|---|
| 44% (8-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 36% (4-7) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 2 |
| 171 | Ranking | 152 |
| 68 | Highest Rank | 47 |
| 27 | Age | 24 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 15 | Titles | 9 |
| 59% (339-233) | Career Total W/L | 60% (212-141) |
| $534,520 | Career Prize Money | $611,865 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 2 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 7-6(3) 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Sumit Nagal
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
66%
(
90 of
137)
1st Serve %
70%
(
94 of
135)
5
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
1
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
65 of
94)
53%
(
25 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
38%
(
52 of
137)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
54 of
135)
139
Total Points Won
133
|
||||
| 7-5 2-6 6-2 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
| 6-1 2-6 6-4 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Sumit Nagal
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
70%
(
56 of
80)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
78
|
||||
| 6-4 2-6 6-3 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Sumit Nagal
49%
(
43 of
88)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
3
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
56%
(
25 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
86
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 2 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 6 |
| 58 | Games Won | 60 |
| 9 | Aces (Total) | 17 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 14 |
| 2:37:50 | Average Match Time | 2:37:50 |
| 68% (263/384) | 1st Serve % | 63% (242/387) |
| 65% (170/263) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (157/242) |
| 50% (61/121) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (74/145) |
| 53% (16/30) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 38% (17/45) |
| 40% (156/387) | Return Points Win % | 40% (153/384) |
| 50% (2/4) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (2/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/2) |
| 50% (2/4) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (3/2) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (3/1) |
| 33% (3/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Sumit Nagal vs Facundo Diaz Acosta Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nagal 2 - 2 Acosta
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nagal has won 42.83% of points on their second serve, while Acosta has won 47.04%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nagal, in recent form, has won 46.7% of their opponent's second serve points, while Acosta has won 48.16%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.86% and 23.35% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nagal has saved 52.61% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Acosta has saved 54.37% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nagal has won 42% of matches played (W/L 21/ 29), with Acosta winning 32.14% (W/L 9/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nagal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 232/ 140), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Acosta has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 184/ 107), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Nagal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 14/ 9), where as Acosta has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 38.89% of matches (W/L 7/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Nagal winning 2 times and Acosta being victorious 2 times. They have played 12 sets in total, with Nagal winning 6 and Acosta winning 6. The last match between Nagal and Acosta was at the Swiss Indoors Basel - Basel, 19-10-2024, Q1 round, I.hard with Sumit Nagal getting the victory 5-7 7-6(3) 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:37:50.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nagal and Acosta have played a deciding set 4 times, with Nagal winning 2 times and Acosta 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Nagal winning 2, and Acosta 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nagal has played against opponents with an average rank of 203.12 while Acosta has played against players with an average rank of 156.96.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nagal has won 77% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Acosta has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nagal has converted 34.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Acosta has converted 30.3% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Sumit Nagal vs Facundo Diaz Acosta Best Odds For The Match
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Sumit Nagal
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
70%
(
16 of
23)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
13 of
20)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
12 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
35
Total Points Won
20
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Federico Iannaccone
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Ergi Kirkin
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
82 of
124)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
46 of
82)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
40%
(
42 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
61 of
124)
124
Total Points Won
105
|
5-7 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Sumit Nagal
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Amine Jamji
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
67
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Sumit Nagal
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve %
84%
(
27 of
32)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
51
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sumit Nagal
Player
Duje Ajdukovic
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Sumit Nagal
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve %
80%
(
41 of
51)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Sumit Nagal
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
27 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
68
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
Player
Sumit Nagal
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
87)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
28 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
87)
76
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 7-6(5) 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Facundo Diaz Acosta Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Moura Monteiro
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
61%
(
57 of
93)
1st Serve %
65%
(
58 of
89)
6
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
46 of
58)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
29 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
26 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
4
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
5
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
32 of
80)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve %
67%
(
18 of
27)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
9 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
34
Total Points Won
19
|
6-2 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Zizou Bergs
60%
(
93 of
154)
1st Serve %
53%
(
86 of
161)
8
Aces
12
9
Double Faults
9
77%
(
72 of
93)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
64 of
86)
51%
(
31 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
40 of
75)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
33%
(
51 of
154)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
57 of
161)
160
Total Points Won
155
|
6-7(5) 6-4 1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Sebastian Baez
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
67%
(
50 of
75)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
29 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Cameron Norrie
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
61%
(
56 of
92)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
105)
5
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
89%
(
50 of
56)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
49 of
71)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
25 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
37 of
105)
104
Total Points Won
93
|
7-5 6-7(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Ajeet Rai
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Nagal vs Acosta?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Nagal Vs Acosta is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59% (339/233) | Win/Loss | 60% (212/141) |
| 58% (773/561) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (482/339) |
| 53% (6537/5748) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (4172/3619) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 782 | Aces Total | 920 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 1233 | Total Double Faults | 1177 |
| 1:32:47 | Average Match Time | 1:47:54 |
| 228.87 | Average Opponent Rank | 298.03 |
| 68% (23791/35192) | 1st Serve % | 58% (13922/23943) |
| 64% (15298/23791) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (9528/13922) |
| 50% (5746/11387) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5084/10021) |
| 44% (1844/4176) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1162/2650) |
| 43% (15480/36169) | Return Points Win % | 42% (10107/24100) |
| 60% (330/549) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (208/337) |
| 25% (4/16) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 29% (2/7) |
| 58% (84/145) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (52/108) |
| 49% (87/178) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (60/115) |
| 84% (354/299) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (222/184) |
| 15% (354/53) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (222/38) |
| 18% (218/40) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (130/29) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
