Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Su-Wei Hsieh vs Mathilde Johansson Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hsieh vs Johansson analysis and find out who is favored!
Su-Wei Hsieh vs Mathilde Johansson Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hsieh has won 43.95% of points on his second serve, while Johansson has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hsieh, in recent form, has won 52.86% of his opponent's second serve points, while Johansson has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.31% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hsieh has saved 58.18% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Johansson has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hsieh has won 41.67% of matches played (W/L 5/ 7), with Johansson winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hsieh has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 335/ 219), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 37% (W/L 7/ 12). Johansson has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 15/ 11), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 42% (W/L 67/ 94).
- Player level: In the last year, Hsieh has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50% of matches (W/L 2/ 2), where as Johansson has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Hsieh winning 3 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Hsieh winning 6 and Johansson winning 3. The last match between Hsieh and Johansson was at the Guangzhou International Women's Open - Guangzhou, 20-09-2012, Quarterfinals, Hard with Su-Wei Hsieh getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:17:23.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hsieh and Johansson have played a deciding set 1 times, with Hsieh winning 1 times and Johansson 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Hsieh winning 1, and Johansson 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hsieh has played against opponents with an average rank of 169 while Johansson has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hsieh has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Johansson has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hsieh has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Johansson has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hsieh 3 - 1 Johansson
604
Rank
23
High
38
Age
R
Plays
3
Total1
2
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
59
High
38
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
59% (483-340)
Career Total W/L
53% (318-277)
20% (1-4)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,464,563
Career Prize Money
$484,901
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Su-Wei Hsieh | Mathilde Johansson |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 3 |
| Games Won | 46 | 34 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:17:23 | 0:17:23 |
| 1st Serve % | 73% (86/118) | 65% (78/120) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 59% (51/86) | 62% (48/78) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (17/32) | 38% (16/42) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 31% (8/26) | 43% (6/14) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (56/120) | 42% (50/118) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 75% (3/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Su-Wei Hsieh
Player
Mathilde Johansson
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
| 6-2 1-6 6-2 | |||||
| 6-3 7-6(4) | |||||
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats
Mathilde Johansson
Player
Su-Wei Hsieh
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
77%
(
51 of
66)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
42%
(
32 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Su-Wei Hsieh | Mathilde Johansson |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 25% (3/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 40% (43/64) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 20% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.08 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 4 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.33 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 17 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:56 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 102.8 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (216/373) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 60% (130/216) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (69/157) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 33% (13/39) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (141/354) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 20% (1/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Su-Wei Hsieh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Greetje Minnen
Player
Su-Wei Hsieh
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
46%
(
28 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
44 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Su-Wei Hsieh
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Su-Wei Hsieh
Player
Kamilla Rakhimova
56%
(
51 of
91)
1st Serve %
53%
(
54 of
102)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
42%
(
38 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
49 of
102)
102
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Su-Wei Hsieh
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
20 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
80
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Dayana Yastremska
Player
Su-Wei Hsieh
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martina Trevisan
Player
Su-Wei Hsieh
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
43%
(
16 of
37)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lucrezia Stefanini
Player
Su-Wei Hsieh
75%
(
90 of
120)
1st Serve %
71%
(
91 of
128)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
49%
(
44 of
90)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
53%
(
10 of
19)
Break Points Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
60 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
70 of
128)
130
Total Points Won
118
|
6-2 6-7(3) 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Su-Wei Hsieh
Player
Kayla Day
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Su-Wei Hsieh
Player
Sachia Vickery
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Erin Routliffe
Player
Su-Wei Hsieh
70%
(
71 of
101)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
46 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(2) 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Mathilde Johansson Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Ivana Jorovic
Player
Mathilde Johansson
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mathilde Johansson
Player
Jesika Maleckova
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
25 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivana Jorovic
Player
Mathilde Johansson
51%
(
42 of
82)
1st Serve %
57%
(
49 of
86)
1
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
10
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
46%
(
38 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jana Cepelova
Player
Mathilde Johansson
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Mathilde Johansson
51%
(
35 of
68)
1st Serve %
49%
(
37 of
76)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
12 of
39)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
33 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nastassja Burnett
Player
Mathilde Johansson
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
55%
(
52 of
95)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
10
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
6-2 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olga Fridman
Player
Mathilde Johansson
56%
(
60 of
108)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
94)
8
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
13
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
25%
(
12 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
15 of
44)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
51%
(
55 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
53 of
94)
106
Total Points Won
96
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kiki Bertens
Player
Mathilde Johansson
55%
(
50 of
91)
1st Serve %
49%
(
44 of
90)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
7
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
32 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Myrtille Georges
Player
Mathilde Johansson
67%
(
12 of
18)
1st Serve %
61%
(
11 of
18)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
8 of
12)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
20
Total Points Won
16
|
3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mathilde Johansson
Player
Georgina Garcia-Perez
68%
(
61 of
90)
1st Serve %
45%
(
31 of
69)
1
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
4
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
87
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 2-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Hsieh Vs Johansson Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
