Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Su Jeong Jang vs Sinja Kraus Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Jang vs Kraus analysis and find out who is favored!
Su Jeong Jang vs Sinja Kraus Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Jang 1 - 1 Kraus
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Jang has won 45.72% of points on their second serve, while Kraus has won 45.27%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Jang, in recent form, has won 51.99% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kraus has won 57.37%. The same stats for first serve returns are 42.86% and 37.51% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Jang has saved 46.2% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kraus has saved 52.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Jang has won 56.86% of matches played (W/L 29/ 22), with Kraus winning 50.85% (W/L 30/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Jang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 73/ 36), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 18/ 14). Kraus has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 134/ 73), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 39% (W/L 21/ 33).
- Player level: In the last year, Jang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.5% of matches (W/L 23/ 17), where as Kraus has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 19/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Jang winning 1 times and Kraus being victorious 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Jang winning 3 and Kraus winning 2. The last match between Jang and Kraus was at the W60 Collonge-Bellerive, 03-09-2022, Semifinals, Clay with Sinja Kraus getting the victory 6-3 4-6 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:38:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Jang and Kraus have played a deciding set 1 times, with Jang winning 0 times and Kraus 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Jang winning 0, and Kraus 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Jang has played against opponents with an average rank of 244.75 while Kraus has played against players with an average rank of 278.34.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Jang has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kraus has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Jang has converted 49.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kraus has converted 46.35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
232
Rank
114
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
246
Rank
151
High
22
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
60% (422-283)
Career Total W/L
57% (185-139)
64% (18-10)
YTD W/L
53% (17-15)
$340,345
Career Prize Money
$96,614
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Su Jeong Jang vs Sinja Kraus For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Jang VS Kraus
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Su Jeong Jang | Sinja Kraus |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 2 |
| Games Won | 27 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:38:0 | 0:38:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (26/44) | 63% (32/51) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (17/26) | 41% (13/32) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (11/18) | 32% (6/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 63% (32/51) | 36% (16/44) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 7-6(5) | |||||
| 6-3 6-0 |
Stats 
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Sinja Kraus
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Su Jeong Jang | Sinja Kraus |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (18/10) | 53% (17/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (40/23) | 51% (38/37) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (325/257) | 49% (331/338) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 53% (8/7) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 83% (5/1) | 53% (8/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 71% (5/2) | 56% (9/7) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 35 | 56 |
| DFs per game | 0.26 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 74 | 97 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:40:42 | 1:30:38 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 284.82 | 233.38 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1157/1671) | 58% (1189/2055) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (722/1157) | 60% (717/1189) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 46% (235/514) | 45% (392/866) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (115/234) | 46% (108/233) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (829/1790) | 45% (916/2036) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (3/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 61% (14/9) | 52% (11/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 64% (18/28) | 55% (17/31) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 60% (6/10) |
| Deciding Set W% | 43% (3/7) | 70% (7/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (15/15) | 87% (15/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (15/0) | 13% (15/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 23% (13/3) | 24% (17/4) |
Su Jeong Jang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Gabriela Lee
77%
(
60 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
46 of
60)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
26 of
52)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Anna Bondar
Player
Su Jeong Jang
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Julie Pastikova
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
52%
(
40 of
77)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
4
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
45 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
60
|
4-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Panna Udvardy
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve %
46%
(
45 of
98)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
9
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Maja Chwalinska
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
30 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Gabriela Lee
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mariam Bolkvadze
Player
Su Jeong Jang
67%
(
80 of
119)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
0
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
59%
(
47 of
80)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
46%
(
55 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
103)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emina Bektas
Player
Su Jeong Jang
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
77%
(
41 of
53)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Haruna Arakawa
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Su Jeong Jang
Player
Yuki Naito
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
85%
(
29 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Sinja Kraus Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Hailey Baptiste
Player
Sinja Kraus
57%
(
46 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
54 of
93)
13
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
24 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
73
|
6-0 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Elizabeth Mandlik
69%
(
75 of
108)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
48%
(
52 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(6) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tamara Zidansek
Player
Sinja Kraus
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Dalila Jakupovic
68%
(
60 of
88)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
0
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
6
52%
(
31 of
60)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
48%
(
42 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
86
Total Points Won
83
|
0-6 6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Sinja Kraus
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
48%
(
14 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
51%
(
22 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
45
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Antonia Schmidt
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
36%
(
10 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
71
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Varvara Lepchenko
Player
Sinja Kraus
73%
(
70 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
46%
(
44 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sinja Kraus
Player
Gabriela Andrea Knutson
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Rubber 2 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Jang Vs Kraus Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Jang are available here and Kraus photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Su Jeong Jang
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
