Su Jeong Jang vs Emina Bektas Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

S. Jeong Jang vs E. Bektas

Su Jeong Jang
Su Jeong Jang

Flag KOR KOR

l
l
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
l
Emina Bektas
Emina Bektas

Flag USA USA

l
l
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
l

0

Win

4

Played

4

Win

30
Age
32
-
Height
-
559
C. Rank
299
114
Best Rank
82
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$356.0K
Career Money
$253.1K
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Jang 0 - 4 Bektas

They have played 9 sets in total, with Su Jeong Jang winning 1 and Emina Bektas winning 8. The last match between Emina Bektas and Su Jeong Jang was at the W75 Kurume, 17-05-2024, Round: QF, Surface: Carpet, with Emina Bektas getting the victory 6-1 6-3.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Jang0
Bektas4
Last 4 H2H Matches:

(QFW75 Kurume(05-17-24)

Carpet
USA Flag
Emina Bektas
6
6
KOR Flag
Su Jeong Jang
1
3

(SFW75 Fukuoka(05-11-24)

Carpet
USA Flag
Emina Bektas
7
4
7
KOR Flag
Su Jeong Jang
6
6
5

(R1W100 Tokyo(04-24-24)

Hard
USA Flag
Emina Bektas
6
6
KOR Flag
Su Jeong Jang
3
4

S. J. Jang vs E. Bektas H2H Profile

Stats
$355,985Career Prize Money$253,068
58.96% (441-307)Career Total W/L57.32% (278-207)
0Hard2
0Indoor2
13Titles9
0Total H2H Matches4
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss33.33% (1-2)

S. J. Jang vs E. Bektas Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Su Jeong Jang has won 41.08% of points on their second serve, while Emina Bektas has won 40.43%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Su Jeong Jang, in recent form, has won 53.57% of their opponent's second serve points, while Emina Bektas has won 41.92%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.45% and 24.10% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Su Jeong Jang has saved 44.34% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Emina Bektas has saved 53.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Su Jeong Jang has won 39.29% of matches played (W/L 11/17), with Emina Bektas winning 51.16% (W/L 22/21) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Su Jeong Jang has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 78/39), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 18/14). Emina Bektas has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 199/136), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 15/23).
  • Player level: In the last year, Su Jeong Jang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40.74% of matches (W/L 11/16), where as Emina Bektas has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.33% of matches (W/L 16/14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Su Jeong Jang winning 0 times and Emina Bektas being victorious 4 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Su Jeong Jang winning 1 and Emina Bektas winning 8.
  • The last match between Su Jeong Jang and Emina Bektas was at the W75 Kurume, 17-05-2024, Round: QF, Surface: Carpet, with Emina Bektas getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:52.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Su Jeong Jang has played against opponents with an average rank of 372.04 while Emina Bektas has played against players with an average rank of 285.12.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Su Jeong Jang has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Emina Bektas has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Su Jeong Jang has converted 37.50% of breakpoint opportunities, and Emina Bektas has converted 35.29% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Su Jeong Jang vs Emina Bektas Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

S. J. Jang vs E. Bektas H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
0H2H Matches Won4
1Sets Won8
35Games Won54
8Aces (Total)18
8Total Double Faults3
1:43:52Average Match Time1:43:52
73% (191/260)1st Serve %66% (173/263)
61% (117/191)1st Serve Win %69% (120/173)
48% (33/69)2nd Serve Win %61% (55/90)
44% (8/18)Break Pts Won %57% (16/28)
33% (88/263)Return Points Win %42% (110/260)
0% (0/4)Best‑of‑3 Win %100% (4/4)
0% (0/1)Deciding Set Win %100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)1st Set Won, Won Match100% (4/4)
0% (0/0)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/4)
0% (0/4)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Jang 43%, Bektas 46%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Jang 54%, Bektas 51%.
Break Points Saved %: Jang 52%, Bektas 58%.

S. J. Jang Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardW35 Darwin - 06-10-2025

QF

JPNR. Goto
L
6-3 3-6 6-4

R2

KORO. Yu
W
2-6 6-2 6-4

R1

JPNY. Ohashi
W
5-0 ret.
HardW35 Darwin - 29-09-2025

SF

JPNS. Akita
L
2-6 7-6(4) 6-4

QF

AUSJ. Sibai
W
6-3 7-5

E. Bektas Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardAbierto Tampico - Tampico - 13-10-2025

R1

CANK. Cross
L
6-4 6-2
HardW50 Rancho Santa Fe - 29-09-2025

QF

USAK. Scott
L
w/o

R2

USAL. Chirico
W
6-1 5-7 6-4

R1

RUSM. Kozyreva
W
6-1 6-4
HardW75 Templeton - 22-09-2025

SF

CANK. Cross
L
6-3 6-3
banner

S. J. Jang vs E. Bektas Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
58.96% (441/307)YTD Win/Loss57.32% (278/207)
57.04% (984/741)Sets Win/Loss55.67% (619/493)
53.45% (8391/7308)Games Win/Loss52.73% (5559/4983)
57.43% (309/229)Hard Win/Loss59.40% (199/136)
66.67% (78/39)Clay Win/Loss39.47% (15/23)
59.02% (36/25)Indoor Hard W/L57.50% (46/34)
56.25% (18/14)Grass Win/Loss56.25% (18/14)
0.08Aces Per Game0.39
643Aces Total2011
0.19Double Faults Per Game0.18
1482Total Double Faults910
1:13:35Average Match Time1:18:45
555.15Average Opponent Rank472.13
69% (22716/32886)1st Serve %67% (18900/28264)
61% (13846/22716)1st Serve Win %68% (12772/18900)
45% (4540/10170)2nd Serve Win %48% (4484/9365)
49% (2140/4405)Break Points Won % (Total)42% (1243/2970)
47% (15870/33870)Return Points Win %41% (11518/28358)
41.67% (15/21)Slam W/L45.45% (10/12)
50.00% (2/2)Masters W/L35.71% (5/9)
64.00% (16/9)Cups W/L0% (0/0)
36.54% (19/33)Main Tour W/L40.38% (21/31)
59.81% (311/209)Challenger W/L59.59% (205/139)
70.27% (78/33)Futures W/L69.81% (37/16)
59% (436/741)Best of 3 Sets Win %58% (274/476)
67% (2/3)Best of 5 Sets Win %100% (1/1)
54% (71/131)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)56% (74/132)
54% (125/230)Deciding Set Win %56% (83/149)
88% (411/362)1st Set Won, Won Match87% (268/233)
12% (411/49)1st Set Won, Lost Match12% (268/33)
23% (337/78)1st Set Lost, Won Match20% (217/43)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

07:10 PM 01/11/25
Prediction
USAA. Anisimova
KAZE. Rybakina
W1
1.57
W2
2.39
04:00 AM 01/11/25
Prediction
JPNS. Saito1
KORS. Park3
W1
1.57
W2
2.24
04:00 AM 01/11/25
Prediction
NEDA. Rus1
USAE. Kalieva7
W1
1.48
W2
2.45
06:30 PM 02/11/25
Prediction
USAC. Gauff
USAJ. Pegula
W1
1.51
W2
2.55
05:00 PM 02/11/25
Prediction
BLRA. Sabalenka
ITAJ. Paolini
W1
1.22
W2
4.25
01:00 AM 01/11/25
Prediction
ITAD. Cherubini
USAE. Mandlik5
W1
4.65
W2
1.152

Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

31 Oct 2025

Sara Bejlek vs Panna Udvardy Prediction – WTA Cali Open – 1st November 2025 Best Bets

31 Oct 2025

Daniil Medvedev vs Alexander Zverev Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 31st October 2025 Best Bets

31 Oct 2025

Raphael Collignon vs Mark Lajal Prediction – ATP Bratislava 2 Challenger – 31st October 2025 Best Bets

31 Oct 2025

Ben Shelton vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 31st October 2025 Best Bets

31 Oct 2025

Raphael Collignon vs Mark Lajal Prediction – ATP Bratislava 2 Challenger – 31st October 2025 Best Bets

31 Oct 2025

Prediction Of Shelton Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Rolex Paris Masters 2025?