Strong Kirchheimer vs Noah Schachter Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 23 Feb at 09:08 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Kirchheimer vs N. Schachter

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Kirchheimer 0 - 1 Schachter
They have played 3 sets in total, with Strong Kirchheimer winning 1 and Noah Schachter winning 2. The last match between Noah Schachter and Strong Kirchheimer was at the San Diego Challenger, 23-02-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Noah Schachter getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kirchheimer | 0 |
| Schachter | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) San Diego Challenger(02-23-25)
S. Kirchheimer vs N. Schachter H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $8,150 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 53.68% (314-271) | Career Total W/L | 51.57% (131-123) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Kirchheimer vs N. Schachter Match Preview:
🎾 **The Second Serve Showdown** 🎾
Schachter's second serve is strutting around with a slight edge, bagging 49.86% of points over the last six months, closely pursued by Kirchheimer at 48.95%. These sneaky second serve numbers have a knack for accurately predicting match outcomes. You could say they're the crystal ball of tennis, minus the mysterious fog and clichéd fortune teller.
🎾 **The Return Game Rumble** 🎾
On the return front, Schachter is playing a game of "Steal the Serve," grabbing 51.11% of opponents' second serve points. Kirchheimer's close on his heels at 50.19%. When it comes to snatching the first serve returns, it's a tight contest again! Schachter steals 33.04% compared to Kirchheimer's 31.44%. These numbers are like a bingo card for determining who has the upper hand in the head-to-head matchup. Eyes down for a full house!
🎾 **Under Pressure Panic Attack** 🎾
The breakpoint saving stats are like the GPA of tennis—a real grade in the School of Pressure. Schachter is our star student, saving 64.94% of breakpoints, while Kirchheimer hits the books with a 57.28% save rate. Knowing this, those placing live bets might consider keeping their calculators handy!
🎾 **Overall Performance Parade** 🎾
In the dramatic showdown of matches in the past year, Schachter has scooped up 50% victories (a symmetrical 32/32 win/loss), while Kirchheimer has been a tad less dramatic, winning 45.45% (25/30). It’s the ultimate tale of who wins the arm-wrestling match at the buffet of career highlights.
🎾 **Grass Gurus vs. Cement Champions** 🎾
Schachter waltzes around the hard courts like a ballroom dancer in sneakers, flaunting a 58% win percentage. Meanwhile, his feet get a little tangled indoors at 44%. Kirchheimer, on the flip side, reigns supreme in the indoor leagues at 57%, but struggles a smidge on hard surfaces with 55% wins. It seems court surface preferences are as finicky as deciding what to wear to a fancy soirée.
🎾 **Tournament Tango** 🎾
While Schachter has been rocking out in the Futures tournaments, achieving a spotlight-stealing 50%, Kirchheimer has been daringly dancing through Challengers with a solid 42.42%. Just remember, stats are like dance moves: it all depends on who’s leading!
🎾 **The Opponent Odyssey** 🎾
Over the last 12 months, Schachter's been squaring off against opponents ranked an average of 339.67, like going up against mini-bosses. Meanwhile, Kirchheimer has faced opponents with a more modest average rank of 414.75, showing that rankings are like spicy food tolerances—personal and occasionally surprising.
🎾 **Deciding Set Drama** 🎾
In the nail-biting, deciding set scenarios, Schachter's been the cool cucumber, winning 55% of these clashes. Kirchheimer, though, faces a modest 38% success rate when it’s crunch time. It seems Schachter thrives when the chips are down—or when the chips are about to be downed.
🎾 **Break Point Blitz** 🎾
When it comes to converting breakpoints, Kirchheimer leads with a high 39.47% conversion rate. Schachter's not far behind with 37.63%. It's like watching two wizards compete for the best spellcasting in overcoming their opponent’s serve. Keep those spellbooks... I mean, betting strategies... handy!
Strong Kirchheimer vs Noah Schachter Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Kirchheimer vs N. Schachter H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 12 | Games Won | 16 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:30:25 | Average Match Time | 2:30:25 |
| 66% (61/92) | 1st Serve % | 56% (54/97) |
| 59% (36/61) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (35/54) |
| 45% (14/31) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (22/43) |
| 40% (4/10) | Break Pts Won % | 86% (6/7) |
| 41% (40/97) | Return Points Win % | 46% (42/92) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Kirchheimer Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-6(3) 4-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(3) 6-2 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 1-6 7-6(5) | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(5) 6-3 | ||
N. Schachter Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 3-6 7-5 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 7-6(6) | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-0 | ||

S. Kirchheimer vs N. Schachter Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.68% (314/271) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.57% (131/123) |
| 54.07% (731/621) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.81% (300/279) |
| 52.13% (6671/6125) | Games Win/Loss | 51.20% (2764/2634) |
| 53.19% (175/154) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.06% (87/71) |
| 54.81% (74/61) | Clay Win/Loss | 48.48% (32/34) |
| 53.72% (65/56) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.00% (12/18) |
| 0.32 | Aces Per Game | 0.31 |
| 2031 | Aces Total | 820 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 1073 | Total Double Faults | 634 |
| 1:28:24 | Average Match Time | 1:16:8 |
| 466.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 350.52 |
| 64% (21324/33182) | 1st Serve % | 60% (7509/12472) |
| 69% (14685/21324) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (5147/7509) |
| 52% (6144/11858) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (2306/4963) |
| 39% (1261/3211) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (487/1213) |
| 39% (13022/33803) | Return Points Win % | 39% (4904/12424) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 43.60% (92/119) | Challenger W/L | 38.10% (16/26) |
| 59.89% (218/146) | Futures W/L | 54.25% (115/97) |
| 54% (310/576) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (130/252) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 49% (83/171) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (25/44) |
| 44% (80/183) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (33/71) |
| 82% (330/272) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (133/112) |
| 17% (330/57) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (133/21) |
| 16% (255/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (121/19) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Polina Kudermetova vs Camilla Rosatello Prediction – WTA Open In Arte Angers Loire – 1st December 2025 Best Bets

Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Varvara Lepchenko vs Panna Udvardy Betting Tips & Picks November 30, 2025

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets
