Stijn Slump vs Alvaro Peiro Serrano Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In the realm of second serve performance, Serrano has demonstrated a slight edge over Slump. Over the past six months, Serrano has secured 45.69% of their second serve points, in contrast to Slump’s 45.3%. The correlation between these statistics and match prediction accuracy cannot be overlooked as it plays a pivotal role in determining likely match outcomes.

Diving into return game statistics, Serrano again shows a superior performance. Recently, Serrano has succeeded in winning 49.61% of their opponent's second serve points compared to Slump’s 41.59%. When facing first serves, Serrano claims 34.62% of points, markedly higher than Slump's 26.31%. These figures significantly contribute to forecasting the more favored contender in head-to-head matchups.

Under pressure, specifically through breakpoints saved, Serrano maintains an edge with a 54.17% success rate, marginally outperforming Slump's 51.6%. This stat provides insightful guidance for in-game betting predictions, offering a glimpse into each player's resilience.

A performance overview paints a diverse picture. Over the last year, Serrano has emerged victorious in 45.45% of matches (15 wins and 18 losses), while Slump boasts a 59.68% win rate (37 wins and 25 losses), indicating Slump's overall advantageous head-to-head prediction position.

When examining surface preferences, both players show a tendency toward clay courts. Serrano's career win rate on clay is 37% (26 wins and 45 losses), identical to their performance on hard courts (10 wins and 17 losses). Slump, however, shines with a 61% win rate on clay (97 wins and 62 losses), whereas they have yet to find success on indoor hard courts (0 wins and 1 loss).

Player match levels reveal that Serrano and Slump have competed predominantly at the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K in the previous year. Serrano has seen a 45.45% success rate (15 wins and 18 losses), while Slump has achieved greater success, winning 64.71% of these matches (33 wins and 18 losses). The event level the players participate in influences the context of their stats and impacts the prediction for who might be favored.

Analyzing opponent quality provides a stark contrast. Serrano has faced opponents with an average ranking of 93.97 over the last year, a much more challenging field compared to Slump's opponents who average a ranking of 398.81.

Deciding set performance gives additional predictive insight. Should this match progress to a deciding set, Slump holds a higher win percentage with 56% in such scenarios, overshadowing Serrano’s 38% success rate.

Looking at break point conversion, Serrano outperforms with a rate of 38.89% as opposed to Slump's 28.79%. Such statistics are crucial for live betting predictions, offering a glimpse into each player’s ability to capitalize on turning points. Taking into account these comprehensive stats, Slump seems positioned as the likely victor, given their superior performance metrics across diverse areas including win percentage, surface proficiency, and deciding set performance.