Stijn Paardekooper vs Tim Ruehl Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Paardekooper vs T. Ruehl

Stijn Paardekooper
NED
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
w
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
22
Age
27
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Tim Ruehl
GER
w
w
l
w
w
l
l
w
l
l
0
Win
0
Played
0
Win
22
Age
27
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Paardekooper 0 - 0 Ruehl
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Paardekooper | 0 |
| Ruehl | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
S. Paardekooper vs T. Ruehl H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 62.50% (40-24) | Career Total W/L | 53.64% (59-51) |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Paardekooper vs T. Ruehl Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stijn Paardekooper has won 45.37% of points on their second serve, while Tim Ruehl has won 50.00%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stijn Paardekooper, in recent form, has won 46.32% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tim Ruehl has won 55.88%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.44% and 21.79% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stijn Paardekooper has saved 60.54% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tim Ruehl has saved 70.97% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stijn Paardekooper has won 64.52% of matches played (W/L 20/11), with Tim Ruehl winning 25.00% (W/L 1/3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stijn Paardekooper has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 37/19), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 33% (W/L 2/4). Tim Ruehl has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 34/26), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/6).
- Player level: In the last year, Stijn Paardekooper has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.52% of matches (W/L 20/11), where as Tim Ruehl has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 25.00% of matches (W/L 1/3). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stijn Paardekooper has played against opponents with an average rank of 329.48 while Tim Ruehl has played against players with an average rank of 311.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stijn Paardekooper has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tim Ruehl has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stijn Paardekooper has converted 31.25% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tim Ruehl has converted 16.67% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Stijn Paardekooper vs Tim Ruehl Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Paardekooper 49%, Ruehl 50%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Paardekooper 49%, Ruehl 56%.
Break Points Saved %: Paardekooper 69%, Ruehl 73%.
S. Paardekooper Recent Matches Played
T. Ruehl Recent Matches Played

S. Paardekooper vs T. Ruehl Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.50% (40/24) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.64% (59/51) |
| 60.54% (89/58) | Sets Win/Loss | 52.55% (134/121) |
| 53.81% (762/654) | Games Win/Loss | 51.63% (1206/1130) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Hard Win/Loss | 52.38% (11/10) |
| 66.07% (37/19) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.67% (34/26) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.28% (14/15) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 120 | Aces Total | 83 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 87 | Total Double Faults | 140 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:4:44 |
| 308.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 347.88 |
| 63% (1475/2328) | 1st Serve % | 60% (2458/4104) |
| 66% (969/1475) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (1530/2458) |
| 49% (417/853) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (758/1646) |
| 43% (104/242) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (188/422) |
| 41% (937/2286) | Return Points Win % | 42% (1647/3941) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 62.50% (40/24) | Futures W/L | 53.70% (58/50) |
| 62% (39/63) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (58/108) |
| 63% (5/8) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (13/26) |
| 50% (10/20) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (20/37) |
| 88% (40/35) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (53/48) |
| 13% (40/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (53/5) |
| 21% (24/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (57/11) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
12:00 PM 27/10/25
PredictionW1
1.56
W2
2.42
01:00 PM 28/10/25
PredictionW1
3.5
W2
1.3
04:00 AM 27/10/25
PredictionW1
1.68
W2
2.1
10:05 PM 26/10/25
PredictionW1
3.58
W2
1.26
10:25 PM 26/10/25
PredictionW1
8.4
W2
1.048
09:05 PM 26/10/25
PredictionW1
2.22
W2
1.61
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips
26 Oct 2025
Prediction Of Fokina Vs Fonseca H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Swiss Indoors Basel 2025?
26 Oct 2025
Yannick Hanfmann vs Jacob Fearnley Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 26th October 2025 Best Bets
26 Oct 2025
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina vs Joao Fonseca Prediction – ATP Swiss Indoors Basel – 26th October 2025 Best Bets
26 Oct 2025
Tomas Martin Etcheverry vs Jesper De Jong Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 26th October 2025 Best Bets
26 Oct 2025
Damir Dzumhur vs Aleksandar Kovacevic Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 26th October 2025 Best Bets
26 Oct 2025
Francisco Comesana vs David Goffin Prediction – ATP Rolex Paris Masters – 26th October 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
13:00
H2H 3-1
12:00
H2H 2-1
12:00
H2H 1-1
Tennis Events This Week
Rolex Paris Masters - Paris
France
Bratislava 2 Challenger
Slovakia
Charlottesville Challenger
United States
Costa do Sauipe Challenger
Brazil
Lima 2 Challenger
Peru
Monastir Challenger
Tunisia
Seoul Challenger
Korea, Rep.
Sioux Falls Challenger
United States
M15 Bol
Croatia
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Hua Hin
Thailand
M15 Malta
Malta
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Selva Gardena
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M15 Szabolcsveresmart
Hungary
M25 Brisbane
Australia
M25 Glasgow
Great Britain
M25 Qian Daohu
China
M25 Sintra
Portugal