Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Steve Darcis vs Jordi Samper-Montana Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Darcis vs Samper-Montana analysis and find out who is favored!
Steve Darcis vs Jordi Samper-Montana Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Darcis has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Samper-Montana has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Darcis, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Samper-Montana has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Darcis has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Samper-Montana has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Darcis has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Samper-Montana winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Darcis has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 278/ 134), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 22/ 24). Samper-Montana has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 69/ 51), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Darcis winning 3 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Darcis winning 6 and Samper-Montana winning 0. The last match between Darcis and Samper-Montana was at the Trnava Challenger, 14-08-2016, Final, Clay with Steve Darcis getting the victory 1100038335.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:17:26.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Darcis and Samper-Montana have played a deciding set 0 times, with Darcis winning 0 times and Samper-Montana 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Darcis winning 0, and Samper-Montana 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Darcis has played against opponents with an average rank of while Samper-Montana has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Darcis has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Samper-Montana has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Darcis has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Samper-Montana has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Darcis 3 - 0 Samper-Montana
Ret.
Rank
38
High
40
Age
R
Plays
3
Total0
0
Hard0
3
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
179
High
33
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
64% (560-318)
Career Total W/L
56% (442-346)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,386,982
Career Prize Money
$84,925
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Darcis VS Samper-Montana H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Steve Darcis | Jordi Samper-Montana |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 0 |
| Games Won | 36 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:17:26 | 1:17:26 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (98/146) | 65% (108/167) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (70/98) | 56% (60/108) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (26/48) | 31% (18/59) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 47% (15/32) | 45% (5/11) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (89/167) | 34% (50/146) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Darcis VS Samper-Montana H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Steve Darcis
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Steve Darcis
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
34
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Steve Darcis
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
73%
(
41 of
56)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Steve Darcis | Jordi Samper-Montana |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Steve Darcis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Elliot Benchetrit
Player
Steve Darcis
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Steve Darcis
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Steve Darcis
Player
Cameron Norrie
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
71%
(
36 of
51)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Robin |
Stats
Steve Darcis
Player
Alexander Cozbinov
58%
(
66 of
113)
1st Serve %
62%
(
72 of
116)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
45%
(
21 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
43%
(
49 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
56 of
116)
120
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 6-7(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Nick Kyrgios
Player
Steve Darcis
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
22
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
100%
(
42 of
42)
1st Serve Won
89%
(
34 of
38)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
8 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 |
Stats
Steve Darcis
Player
Santiago Giraldo
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
74%
(
40 of
54)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jiri Vesely
Player
Steve Darcis
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
19
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
3
87%
(
40 of
46)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
39 of
46)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
19 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Steve Darcis
Player
Lloyd Harris
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
6
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
3
89%
(
25 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Steve Darcis
Player
Illya Marchenko
47%
(
54 of
116)
1st Serve %
59%
(
61 of
103)
9
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
50 of
61)
56%
(
35 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
38 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
103)
112
Total Points Won
107
|
6-7(4) 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Steve Darcis
Player
Kamil Majchrzak
49%
(
45 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
10
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
54%
(
25 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Jordi Samper-Montana Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 | 7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Gengo Kikuchi
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
9 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Len Schouten
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Palaphoom Kovapitukted
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ko Suzuki
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
90
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 0-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Shohei Chikami
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pol Toledo Bague
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Darcis Vs Samper-Montana Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
