Stephanie Judith Visscher vs Jenny Duerst Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

In the realm of second serve performance over the past six months, Visscher has maintained a slight edge, winning 39.36% of their second serve points compared to Duerst's 36.7%. This statistic is significant due to its potent correlation with accurately predicting match outcomes.

When turning the focus to return game statistics, Duerst has shown proficiency by winning 47.66% of points on their opponent's second serve, while Visscher achieved a 46.62% win rate. Notably, Duerst also outperformed Visscher on first serve returns, winning 33.4% of points compared to Visscher's 24.69%. These figures suggest a pattern that tilts the head-to-head matchup in Duerst's favor.

Under pressure, Visscher appears to show slightly more resilience, saving 49.1% of breakpoints in contrast to Duerst's 45.66%. This can be a decisive factor during crucial moments of play and in-game betting predictions.

Assessing overall performance over the past year, Duerst has achieved a higher match win percentage of 71.43% (W/L 50/20), whereas Visscher has recorded a 68.09% (W/L 64/30) win rate. Head-to-head encounters highlight Duerst’s dominance, with one win from their sole meeting against Visscher. Their last match was at the W 15 Pretoria on a hard court, where Duerst won convincingly 6-1, 6-3.

Surface preference and past records illustrate Duerst's proficiency on hard courts with a 61% career win rate, while Visscher excels on indoor hard courts, boasting a 63% win rate. However, Visscher shows a weaker performance on clay, winning only 54% of matches.

Regarding tournament levels, Duerst has predominantly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments with over $10,000 in prize money, achieving a 66.67% win rate. In comparison, Visscher has excelled in Futures/Satellites/ITF events with a 79.66% success rate.

Considering deciding set performances, Duerst has shown stronger nerves, winning 64% of deciding sets in the past year compared to Visscher's 46%. Additionally, in breakpoint conversion—a key element for live betting—Duerst has been more efficient, converting 41.61% of opportunities against Visscher’s 29.38%.

Taking all statistical evaluations into account, Duerst appears to have a superior edge over Visscher across various performance metrics. With a higher match win percentage and demonstrated success in high-pressure situations, Duerst is predicted to emerge victorious in the upcoming match.