Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Stephan Hoiss vs Jakub Paul Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hoiss vs Paul analysis and find out who is favored!
Stephan Hoiss vs Jakub Paul Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hoiss has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Paul has won 51.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hoiss, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Paul has won 58.68%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 36.84% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hoiss has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paul has saved 58.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hoiss has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Paul winning 62.12% (W/L 41/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hoiss has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 10/ 9), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4). Paul has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 64/ 37), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 28/ 30).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Hoiss winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Hoiss winning 2 and Paul winning 0. The last match between Hoiss and Paul was at the Germany F14 (Oberhaching), 09-10-2017, Q1 round, I.hard with Stephan Hoiss getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Hoiss and Paul have played a deciding set 0 times, with Hoiss winning 0 times and Paul 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Hoiss winning 0, and Paul 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hoiss has played against opponents with an average rank of while Paul has played against players with an average rank of 221.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hoiss has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paul has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hoiss has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paul has converted 50.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hoiss 1 - 0 Paul
Ret.
Rank
High
34
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
522
Rank
438
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
50% (57-56)
Career Total W/L
54% (173-145)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
59% (13-9)
$1,390
Career Prize Money
$2,285
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Stephan Hoiss | Jakub Paul |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Stephan Hoiss | Jakub Paul |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 59% (13/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (28/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (244/228) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (9/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 28 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.15 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 35 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:40:35 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 240.41 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (1024/1533) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 62% (633/1024) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (255/509) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 51% (79/156) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (656/1526) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 59% (10/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (12/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 83% (12/10) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (12/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 30% (10/3) |
Stephan Hoiss Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 4-6 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Mukund Sasikumar
Player
Stephan Hoiss
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve %
53%
(
20 of
38)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
14 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
47
Total Points Won
29
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Tinelli
Player
Stephan Hoiss
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Jakub Paul Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
Jakub Paul
67%
(
81 of
121)
1st Serve %
72%
(
74 of
103)
5
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
0
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
51 of
74)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
47 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
115
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(8) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Jakub Paul
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Jakub Paul
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Tomas Lanik
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-6(8) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Jakub Paul
78%
(
67 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
48 of
67)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Remy Bertola
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Vincent Marysko
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
2-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jakub Paul
Player
Mikalai Haliak
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Jakub Paul
45%
(
29 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thomas Deschamps
Player
Jakub Paul
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Hoiss Vs Paul Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
