Stefan Kozlov vs Cedrik-Marcel Stebe Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Recent second serve success: Cedrik-Marcel Stebe has a lower success rate on second serve at 43.65%, compared to Stefan Kozlov's 47.38%. Could this indicate a potential edge for Kozlov?
• Return game comparison: Stebe has won 47.55% of points on opponents' second serves, marginally less than Kozlov's 48.37%. This close margin makes for an interesting comparison.
• First serve return analysis: Kozlov narrowly leads with 29.54% of points won, just ahead of Stebe's 29.37%. Will this slight difference matter in the H2H match?
• Pressure situations: Stebe excels under pressure, saving 54.85% of breakpoints compared to Kozlov's 50.96%. This ability could be crucial during critical match moments.
• Overall match outcomes: Over the past year, Kozlov has a slight edge with a 68.57% win rate versus Stebe's 66.67% win rate.
• Surface preference: Both players shine on indoor hard courts with identical win percentages of 63%, but struggle more on grass, with Kozlov at 38% and Stebe at 45%.
• Playing level and event impact: Stebe competes mainly in < $10K events with a 60% success rate, while Kozlov achieves 66.67% in similar tournaments. How does this affect their chances on bigger stages?
• Opponent caliber: Stebe has faced higher-ranked opponents, averaging rank 341.98, compared to Kozlov's opponents at rank 402.63. Could stronger opposition harden Stebe's competitive edge?
• Deciding set performance: A crucial stat for close matches; Stebe has an 80% win rate in deciding sets over the last year, while Kozlov maintains 67%.
• Break point efficiency: Stebe converts 32.20% of breakpoints, overshadowed by Kozlov's higher 37.50% conversion rate, which may influence in-game betting.

Editorial Prediction (November 15, 2025, UTC):

As the upcoming match between Cedrik-Marcel Stebe and Stefan Kozlov approaches, key statistics offer insights into each player's potential advantages.

Kozlov may have a slight edge with better performance on second serves and a higher break point conversion rate, making him a formidable opponent when trying to close out games.

Stebe, however, showcases resilience, especially in deciding sets and under pressure situations, suggesting he may handle tight match scenarios better than Kozlov.

Considering these factors, while Kozlov appears statistically favored in certain aspects, Stebe's competence in high-pressure moments could sway the match in his favor.

Ultimately, given the relatively balanced stats with some strong points for each player, both have valid reasons for optimism. However, Kozlov's recent advantages in key areas suggest he might be the more likely winner of this contest.