Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Stacey Fung vs Madison Sieg Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fung vs Sieg analysis and find out who is favored!
Stacey Fung vs Madison Sieg Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fung has won 45.59% of points on his second serve, while Sieg has won 44.43%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fung, in recent form, has won 54.61% of his opponent's second serve points, while Sieg has won 52.84%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.77% and 40.44% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fung has saved 52.72% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Sieg has saved 48.15% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fung has won 55.77% of matches played (W/L 29/ 23), with Sieg winning 57.63% (W/L 34/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fung has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 27/ 14), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Sieg has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 8/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 45/ 35).
- Player level: In the last year, Fung has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.18% of matches (W/L 29/ 20), where as Sieg has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 34/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Fung winning 4 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Fung winning 8 and Sieg winning 0. The last match between Fung and Sieg was at the W75 Rome, 01-02-2024, Second, I.hard with Stacey Fung getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:3:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fung and Sieg have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fung winning 0 times and Sieg 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Fung winning 2, and Sieg 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fung has played against opponents with an average rank of 253.13 while Sieg has played against players with an average rank of 277.24.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fung has won 31% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Sieg has won 75% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fung has converted 46.51% of breakpoint opportunities, and Sieg has converted 51.06% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fung 4 - 0 Sieg
262
Rank
222
High
27
Age
Plays
4
Total0
3
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
329
Rank
329
High
20
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
64% (142-81)
Career Total W/L
57% (75-57)
47% (8-9)
YTD W/L
41% (7-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Stacey Fung | Madison Sieg |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 4 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 8 | 0 |
| Games Won | 50 | 33 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 15 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:3:30 | 2:3:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (182/262) | 68% (192/283) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 66% (121/182) | 58% (111/192) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (42/80) | 41% (37/91) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (18/40) | 40% (10/25) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (135/283) | 38% (99/262) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/4) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (4/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Stacey Fung
Player
Madison Sieg
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve %
70%
(
49 of
70)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Madison Sieg
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
9
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
47%
(
29 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 7-6(2) 6-4 |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Madison Sieg
84%
(
62 of
74)
1st Serve %
71%
(
59 of
83)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Madison Sieg
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Stacey Fung | Madison Sieg |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (8/9) | 41% (7/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (20/20) | 39% (14/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (191/188) | 44% (145/184) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 43% (6/8) | 0% (0/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.16 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 29 | 9 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.35 |
| DFs Total | 46 | 56 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:57:21 | 1:45:18 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 354.88 | 229.76 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (760/1207) | 65% (734/1121) |
| 1st Serve W% | 61% (466/760) | 54% (399/734) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (192/447) | 46% (179/387) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (76/150) | 53% (58/109) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (554/1194) | 43% (439/1013) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (8/7) | 44% (7/9) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (8/17) | 38% (6/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 33% (2/6) | 67% (2/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (7/0) | 10% (10/1) |
Stacey Fung Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Destanee Aiava
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Hanna Chang
75%
(
46 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Dalayna Hewitt
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
45%
(
24 of
53)
0
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
18 of
24)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Momoko Kobori
65%
(
66 of
101)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
105)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
50%
(
50 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
49 of
105)
100
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Stacey Fung
65%
(
70 of
108)
1st Serve %
61%
(
57 of
94)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
46 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
103
Total Points Won
99
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lanlana Tararudee
Player
Stacey Fung
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Claire Liu
Player
Stacey Fung
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
5
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victoria Rodriguez
Player
Stacey Fung
72%
(
57 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
49%
(
39 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
53 of
96)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stacey Fung
Player
Jessie Aney
64%
(
68 of
106)
1st Serve %
47%
(
40 of
86)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
47 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
99
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Madison Sieg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Solana Sierra
Player
Madison Sieg
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Ana Candiotto
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carolina Meligeni Alves
Player
Madison Sieg
54%
(
36 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
69)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
69)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oceane Dodin
Player
Madison Sieg
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
39 of
59)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nahia Berecoechea
Player
Madison Sieg
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kayla Day
Player
Madison Sieg
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Leonie Kung
Player
Madison Sieg
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Lea Ma
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
23 of
40)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
42%
(
20 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
46
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Marine Partaud
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
39%
(
30 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
77
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(2) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Sieg
Player
Ava Markham
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Fung Vs Sieg Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
