Stacey Fung vs Jamie Loeb Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
S. Fung vs J. Loeb

Stacey Fung

CAN

1

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

Height

1.68m

440

C. Rank

516

222

Best Rank

132

Total Title

YTD Titles

$8.8K

Career Money

$226.3K

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Jamie Loeb

USA

1

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

Height

1.68m

440

C. Rank

516

222

Best Rank

132

Total Title

YTD Titles

$8.8K

Career Money

$226.3K

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Head-to-head: Fung 1 - 2 Loeb

They have played 9 sets in total, with Stacey Fung winning 4 and Jamie Loeb winning 5. The last match between Jamie Loeb and Stacey Fung was at the W60 Rome, 05-10-2023, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Jamie Loeb getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Fung	1
Loeb	2

Last H2H Matches:

(R2) W60 Rome(10-05-23)

Stats

Jamie Loeb

Stacey Fung

(R1) W100 Landisville(08-09-23)

Stats

Jamie Loeb

Stacey Fung

(QF) W25 Fredericton(03-10-23)

Stats

Stacey Fung

Jamie Loeb

S. Fung vs J. Loeb H2H Profile

S. Fung	Stats	J. Loeb
$8,800	Career Prize Money	$226,266
62.63% (176-105)	Career Total W/L	53.91% (324-277)
0	Hard	1
1	Indoor	1
9	Titles	11
1	Total H2H Matches	2
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0.00% (0-1)

S. Fung vs J. Loeb Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stacey Fung has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Jamie Loeb has won 40.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stacey Fung, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jamie Loeb has won 51.23%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 30.94% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Stacey Fung has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jamie Loeb has saved 51.05% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Stacey Fung has won 54.84% of matches played (W/L 17/14), with Jamie Loeb winning 55.10% (W/L 27/22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Stacey Fung has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 40/23), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Jamie Loeb has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 190/143), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 8/17).
Player level: In the last year, Stacey Fung has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.67% of matches (W/L 17/13), where as Jamie Loeb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.35% of matches (W/L 25/21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Stacey Fung winning 1 times and Jamie Loeb being victorious 2 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Stacey Fung winning 4 and Jamie Loeb winning 5.
The last match between Stacey Fung and Jamie Loeb was at the W60 Rome, 05-10-2023, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Jamie Loeb getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:28:40.
Deciding set H2H prediction: Stacey Fung and Jamie Loeb have played a deciding set 3 times, with Stacey Fung winning 1 times and Jamie Loeb 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stacey Fung has played against opponents with an average rank of 421 while Jamie Loeb has played against players with an average rank of 386.94.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stacey Fung has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jamie Loeb has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Stacey Fung has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jamie Loeb has converted 33.96% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Stacey Fung vs Jamie Loeb Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

S. Fung vs J. Loeb H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

S. Fung	Stats	J. Loeb
1	H2H Matches Won	2
4	Sets Won	5
41	Games Won	41
9	Aces (Total)	15
10	Total Double Faults	19
2:28:40	Average Match Time	2:28:40
57% (155/271)	1st Serve %	53% (133/251)
65% (101/155)	1st Serve Win %	71% (95/133)
47% (54/116)	2nd Serve Win %	42% (50/118)
46% (13/28)	Break Pts Won %	48% (14/29)
42% (106/251)	Return Points Win %	43% (116/271)
33% (1/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	67% (2/3)
33% (1/3)	Deciding Set Win %	67% (2/3)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	50% (1/2)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	100% (1/1)

Recent Performance Stats

S. Fung Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W50 Santo Domingo - 24-03-2025
R2 Sara DaavettilaS. Daavettila	L	3-6 6-3 6-3	Stats
W50 Santo Domingo - 17-03-2025
R3 Maria MateasM. Mateas	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
R2 Ema Burgic BuckoE. Burgic	W	6-2 7-6(5)	Stats
W50 Birmingham - 10-02-2025
R2 Anna Sinclair RogersA. Sinclair	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
R1 Julie BelgraverJ. Belgraver	W	3-6 7-6(5) 6-3	Stats

View All

J. Loeb Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W75 Sumter - 02-06-2025
R1 Unknown PlayerU. Player	L	5-7 6-4 3-1 ret.	Stats
Q3 Emily De OliveiraE. De	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
Q1 Abigail RencheliA. Rencheli	W	6-4 6-3	Stats
W35 Santo Domingo - 26-05-2025
R3 Thaisa Grana PedrettiT. Grana	L	7-6(3) 6-2	Stats
R2 Mariana Isabel Higuita BarrazaM. Isabel	W	6-0 2-6 6-4	Stats

View All

S. Fung vs J. Loeb Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

S. Fung	Stats	J. Loeb
62.63% (176/105)	YTD Win/Loss	53.91% (324/277)
62.30% (390/236)	Sets Win/Loss	53.36% (739/646)
55.44% (3127/2513)	Games Win/Loss	51.27% (6503/6180)
63.26% (136/79)	Hard Win/Loss	57.06% (190/143)
0.00% (0/2)	Clay Win/Loss	51.72% (90/84)
62.50% (40/24)	Indoor Hard W/L	52.17% (36/33)
0% (0/0)	Grass Win/Loss	32.00% (8/17)
0.13	Aces Per Game	0.24
353	Aces Total	1472
0.13	Double Faults Per Game	0.28
368	Total Double Faults	1745
1:34:54	Average Match Time	1:18:23
508.46	Average Opponent Rank	516.7
67% (10259/15301)	1st Serve %	54% (17485/32413)
62% (6319/10259)	1st Serve Win %	65% (11351/17485)
48% (2407/5043)	2nd Serve Win %	46% (6867/14927)
49% (1059/2173)	Break Points Won % (Total)	47% (1765/3778)
48% (7531/15767)	Return Points Win %	44% (14442/33101)
0.00% (0/1)	Slam W/L	45.71% (16/19)
33.33% (1/2)	Masters W/L	37.50% (3/5)
0.00% (0/2)	Main Tour W/L	42.59% (23/31)
58.58% (99/70)	Challenger W/L	53.80% (255/219)
71.70% (76/30)	Futures W/L	90.00% (27/3)
63% (173/274)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (320/593)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	50% (2/4)
64% (30/47)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	45% (54/119)
42% (29/69)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (92/183)
87% (188/163)	1st Set Won, Won Match	83% (344/287)
13% (188/24)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	16% (344/56)
14% (93/13)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	14% (257/37)