Sofia Costoulas vs Eliz Maloney Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
S. Costoulas vs E. Maloney

BEL
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Costoulas 1 - 0 Maloney
They have played 3 sets in total, with Sofia Costoulas winning 2 and Eliz Maloney winning 1. The last match between Sofia Costoulas and Eliz Maloney was at the W35 Manchester, 18-02-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Sofia Costoulas getting the victory 4-6 6-1 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Costoulas | 1 |
| Maloney | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Manchester(02-18-25)
S. Costoulas vs E. Maloney H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $43,000 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 60.76% (175-113) | Career Total W/L | 53.18% (117-103) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 50.00% (1-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. Costoulas vs E. Maloney Match Preview:
Analysis of Second Serve Performance: Examining recent form over the last six months, it is observed that Maloney has achieved a 38.54% success rate in winning points on their second serve. In contrast, Costoulas has displayed a superior performance, winning 49.57% of points on their second serve. It is worth noting that a significant correlation exists between this statistical measure and the accuracy of match predictions.
Insights on Return Game Statistics: Taking into account recent form, Maloney has proven their prowess by winning 50% of the points on their opponent's second serve. On the other hand, Costoulas has surpassed Maloney, showcasing a higher success rate of 51.74%. In regards to first serve returns, Maloney has demonstrated a 39.36% efficiency, while Costoulas has showcased a lower but still commendable rate of 37.1%. These return game statistics significantly contribute to determining the favored player in their upcoming head-to-head matchup.
Analysis of Performance Under Pressure: When faced with intense pressure, Maloney has garnered a remarkable 60% save rate for breakpoints in recent matches. Comparatively, Costoulas has managed to save 58.65% of breakpoints, signifying their ability to navigate challenging situations. This statistic holds considerable relevance when making predictions for in-game betting scenarios.
Performance Overview: In the past year, Maloney has attained a 31.58% victory rate in the matches they participated in (W/L 6/13). In remarkable contrast, Costoulas has excelled, securing a 58.44% triumph rate (W/L 45/32). Considering these overall head-to-head statistics, a comprehensive prediction overview emerges.
Identification of the Best Surface: Evaluating historical career data, it is evident that Maloney has achieved the highest win percentage on I.hard surfaces, triumphing in 57% of their matches (W/L 26/20). Conversely, their performance on Grass surfaces has been subpar, with a 0% success rate (W/L 0/3). Costoulas, on the other hand, has displayed their proficiency on Hard surfaces, garnering a notable win percentage of 65% (W/L 73/40). However, their weakest performance lies in matches on Clay surfaces, where they have achieved a 51% win rate (W/L 40/38).
Evaluation of Player Level: Over the past year, Maloney has predominantly competed in Challenger and ITF tournaments with prize money exceeding $10,000. Within this domain, they have achieved a 28.57% victory rate (W/L 4/10). Conversely, Costoulas has also gained significant experience in Challenger and ITF tournaments exceeding $10,000, concluding matches with a commendable 57.75% success rate (W/L 41/30). To accurately predict the favored player, it is vital to contextualize their performance statistics within the event level they have predominantly competed in.
Examination of Opponent Quality: Assessing the opponents faced within the last twelve months, it is evident that Maloney has engaged with players holding an average rank of 266.05. Conversely, Costoulas has confronted opponents boasting an average rank of 403.96. These contrasting opponent quality metrics should be considered when forecasting the outcome of the upcoming match.
Deciding Set Performance against All Players: For those seeking live predictions and engaging in betting activities, it is noteworthy that Maloney has triumphed in 50% of deciding sets over the previous twelve months. Costoulas, on the other hand, has emerged victorious in 65% of all matches played on the tour. These statistics become highly relevant if the match transitions into a decisive set.
Relevance of Current Event Head-to-Head Stats: While past player performances significantly contribute to predicting tennis matches, it is imperative to evaluate current event statistics to identify in-form players. Thus, for up-to-date indications of player performance within the ongoing event, it is advised to refer to the section below (if applicable). Furthermore, considering that players may exhibit differing levels of competency depending on the event, this aspect must be factored in when forecasting the ultimate outcome.
Break Point Conversion Insights: In recent form, Maloney has impressively converted 50% of their breakpoint opportunities, while Costoulas has displayed a slightly lower conversion rate of 46.38% in their attempts to break their opponents' serves. This particular statistic becomes revealing when seeking in-game live betting tips, especially when either player is presented with a breakpoint opportunity.
If you are intrigued by predictive models for tennis matches, this article offers a valuable starting point. It is important to note that this article is primarily intended for statistics enthusiasts.
Sofia Costoulas vs Eliz Maloney Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. Costoulas vs E. Maloney H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 8 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:7:29 | Average Match Time | 2:7:29 |
| 73% (67/92) | 1st Serve % | 67% (52/78) |
| 66% (44/67) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (26/52) |
| 60% (15/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (11/26) |
| 46% (6/13) | Break Pts Won % | 18% (2/11) |
| 53% (41/78) | Return Points Win % | 36% (33/92) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. Costoulas Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rubber 1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
QF | L | 7-5 4-6 7-6(5) | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 4-6 6-2 | ||
SF | L | 6-3 7-5 | ||
E. Maloney Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Q3 | L | 7-5 6-7(5) 10-8 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 7-6(5) | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||

S. Costoulas vs E. Maloney Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.76% (175/113) | YTD Win/Loss | 53.18% (117/103) |
| 58.86% (392/274) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.39% (260/227) |
| 54.02% (3262/2776) | Games Win/Loss | 51.73% (2287/2134) |
| 65.03% (93/50) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.65% (69/55) |
| 53.85% (49/42) | Clay Win/Loss | 48.57% (17/18) |
| 62.26% (33/20) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.45% (31/27) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 769 | Aces Total | 218 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.14 |
| 587 | Total Double Faults | 312 |
| 1:48:9 | Average Match Time | 1:5:45 |
| 444.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 427.05 |
| 61% (11654/19073) | 1st Serve % | 69% (6636/9629) |
| 64% (7460/11654) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (3885/6636) |
| 47% (3520/7419) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1338/2993) |
| 48% (1180/2446) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (550/1181) |
| 46% (8922/19481) | Return Points Win % | 45% (4293/9502) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61.22% (150/95) | Challenger W/L | 48.54% (50/53) |
| 62.86% (22/13) | Futures W/L | 57.26% (67/50) |
| 61% (175/285) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 53% (117/219) |
| 57% (30/53) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 65% (20/31) |
| 55% (51/93) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (22/48) |
| 86% (169/146) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (122/108) |
| 13% (169/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (122/14) |
| 24% (119/29) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (98/9) |